Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
On 09/01/2009, at 7:19 AM, Colin Percival wrote:
2. Assuming the first mirror still fails, use the -s option to pick a
different
mirror.
Where can we find a list of mirrors?
The list of is distributed via DNS SRV records:
# host -t srv _http._tcp.update.freebsd.o
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, Sam Leffler wrote:
I've brought the hal source code back to RELENG_7 but not connected it
to the build and/or driver. I want folks to test this before I commit
those changes. To do this you must have an up to date RELENG_7 code
base and then apply this patch:
http://peo
On Jan 8, 2009, at 15:12 , Sam Leffler wrote:
I've brought the hal source code back to RELENG_7 but not connected
it to the build and/or driver. I want folks to test this before I
commit those changes. To do this you must have an up to date
RELENG_7 code base and then apply this patch:
Aristedes Maniatis wrote, on 1/8/2009 5:12 PM:
>
> On 09/01/2009, at 7:19 AM, Colin Percival wrote:
>
>> 2. Assuming the first mirror still fails, use the -s option to pick a
>> different
>> mirror.
>
> Where can we find a list of mirrors?
This technically answers your question, but may not be
On 09/01/2009, at 7:19 AM, Colin Percival wrote:
2. Assuming the first mirror still fails, use the -s option to pick
a different
mirror.
Where can we find a list of mirrors?
Ari Maniatis
-->
ish
http://www.ish.com.au
Level 1, 30 Wilson Street Newtown 2042 Austral
I have a number of HP 1U servers, all of which were running 7.0
perfectly happily. I have been testing 7.1 in it's various incarnations
for the last couple of months on our test server and it has performed
perfectly.
So the last two days I have been round upgrading all our servers, knowing
that I
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 20:20 +0100, Manfred_Knick wrote:
> First: Congratulations upon 7.1 final RELEASE !
>
> On Fri, 24 Oct 2008, I pointed out the
>
> "possibility of a severe flaw in the logic of FreeBSD's kernel
> handling multiple host bridges
> and the corresponding assignment
On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 02:50:45AM +0800, Mars G Miro wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 2:33 AM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> > Well, I am at Intel you know, and even we don't seem to have any systems
> > with
> > 82576 down in my group here. The way link works I can be about 99.9% sure
> > in saying its not
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 22:26 +0100, Roland Smith wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 12:36:20PM -0500, Robert Noland wrote:
> > I have a patch available for testing at
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~rnoland/drm-update-7-010609.patch.bz2
>
> Excellent! Thanks for your hard work on this, Robert!
>
> A
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 12:36:20PM -0500, Robert Noland wrote:
> I have a patch available for testing at
> http://people.freebsd.org/~rnoland/drm-update-7-010609.patch.bz2
Excellent! Thanks for your hard work on this, Robert!
After updating my source to 7.1-RELEASE, I applied this patch and buil
I've brought the hal source code back to RELENG_7 but not connected it
to the build and/or driver. I want folks to test this before I commit
those changes. To do this you must have an up to date RELENG_7 code
base and then apply this patch:
http://people.freebsd.org/~sam/ath_hal-releng7.patc
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 11:47:42AM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Greg Byshenk wrote:
> > Andrei Kolu wrote:
> > > NOTE: I do not reboot my system until everything is updated. Why it is
> > > necessary to boot new kernel and then upgrade world is beyound me..YMMW
> >
> > - I suppose that it
Hi all,
There are now more freebsd-update mirrors and it looks like they're handling the
load quite well.
It's possible that the load balancing between mirrors will need to be tweaked a
bit. If you have problems accessing a mirror (e.g., if freebsd-update exits
with an error of "downloading fil
First: Congratulations upon 7.1 final RELEASE !
On Fri, 24 Oct 2008, I pointed out the
"possibility of a severe flaw in the logic of FreeBSD's kernel
handling multiple host bridges
and the corresponding assignment of
(in principle, correctly detected)
devices to their host bri
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:12:05 +0200
Krassimir Slavchev wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello All,
>
> I have had a problem detecting the network card on my notebook when
> ACPI is enabled for a year. The problem still exists in 7.1-RELEASE.
Which make and model note
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 3:06 AM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> So it wasn't identified during install but was in the kernel you built
> afterward, is that
> what you're saying? Even if that's true I don't think its relevant to the
> failure.
>
Ahm no, sysinstall said something like:
igb0:
igb1:
but we
So it wasn't identified during install but was in the kernel you built
afterward, is that
what you're saying? Even if that's true I don't think its relevant to the
failure.
I have made a couple queries internally, there are a lot of variations on
Nehalem
systems, at least one other engineer in my
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 03:06:42PM +0200, Alexander Shikoff wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 11:14:22PM +0100, Harald Weis wrote:
> > Is there a way to install the SCX-4200 printer on a FreeBSD box ?
> > The printer is delivered with the install software required for Linux.
> > And CUPS does not se
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 2:33 AM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> Well, I am at Intel you know, and even we don't seem to have any systems
> with
> 82576 down in my group here. The way link works I can be about 99.9% sure
> in saying its not the driver. Its preproduction so there are lots of
> possibilities,
>
Wow, I catch the problem. My memory realy is broken the memtest warn me. =/
I take a new memory and try again.
[]'s
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 8:34 AM, Diego Ribeiro wrote:
> Realy my box is obsolet(Atlhon 2.0 - 512 Ram) I try without -j for discard
> overheated.
>
> tks again.
>
>
> On Wed, Jan
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 01:01:57PM -0500, Alex Goncharov wrote:
> ,--- You/Harald (Thu, 8 Jan 2009 12:11:27 +0100) *
> | > Try to install the cupsys, cupsys-bsd, cupsomatic-ppd and foomatic-db
> | > ports and take a look at this link:
> |
> | None of these exist in the FreeBSD port index (/usr
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 12:44 AM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> I have not seen a problem like this ever, what is the link partner
> of each NIC and if you switch the ports what happens?
>
Hi Jack,
They're connected to a GigE switch. It was just one w/ the first
NIC, but having seen that it only connect
,--- You/Harald (Thu, 8 Jan 2009 12:11:27 +0100) *
| > Try to install the cupsys, cupsys-bsd, cupsomatic-ppd and foomatic-db
| > ports and take a look at this link:
|
| None of these exist in the FreeBSD port index (/usr/ports/INDEX-7)
So, you've now looked :-)
I've had good experience with
I have not seen a problem like this ever, what is the link partner
of each NIC and if you switch the ports what happens?
We have Nehalem's in the validation lab but I have not had an
excuse to install on one so far, I guess now I do :)
Jack
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 6:16 AM, Mars G Miro wrote:
>
Spil Oss wrote:
Hi Peter,
Thanks a lot! Will read up on that. (luckily I do speak
german/swiss-german). From discussions on ##FreeBSD IRC I learned that
it is not recommended to use lo0 for jails!
On FreeBSD-6.3 I succesfully used lo0/127.0.0.2 for my mysql jail that
needed to be addressed only
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 11:57 -0500, Steve Polyack wrote:
> Robert Noland wrote:
> > I am planning to merge most all of the drm from -CURRENT to releng_7
> > shortly. The merge that I have staged includes the following.
> >
> > Merged /head/sys:r182080,182467-182469,182883-182884,183573,183603-18360
Robert Noland wrote:
I am planning to merge most all of the drm from -CURRENT to releng_7
shortly. The merge that I have staged includes the following.
Merged /head/sys:r182080,182467-182469,182883-182884,183573,183603-183605,
183828,183830-183834,184212-184213,184263,184373-184375
The
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 17:22 +0100, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 15:27:08 +0100
> Uwe Laverenz wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 09:03:50AM -0500, Robert Noland wrote:
> >
> > > > 1) the infamous "ThinkPad T43p" ;) running i386:
> > > >
> > > > Sorry, but RELENG_7_1 with your dr
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 17:22 +0100, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 15:27:08 +0100
> Uwe Laverenz wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 09:03:50AM -0500, Robert Noland wrote:
> >
> > > > 1) the infamous "ThinkPad T43p" ;) running i386:
> > > >
> > > > Sorry, but RELENG_7_1 with your dr
Hi,
I am having kernel dumps with FreeBSD 7.1
panic: semexit - semid not allocated
cpuid = 1
Uptime : 8m22s
Cannot dump. No dump device defined
Sleeping thread (tid 100129, pid 1479) owns a non-sleepable lock
I know it is not clear and there were no swap space configured on this
server (which I
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 15:27:08 +0100
Uwe Laverenz wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 09:03:50AM -0500, Robert Noland wrote:
>
> > > 1) the infamous "ThinkPad T43p" ;) running i386:
> > >
> > > Sorry, but RELENG_7_1 with your drm-update still shows a garbled
> > > screen. The same userland with a -CU
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 09:03:50AM -0500, Robert Noland wrote:
> > 1) the infamous "ThinkPad T43p" ;) running i386:
> >
> > Sorry, but RELENG_7_1 with your drm-update still shows a garbled
> > screen. The same userland with a -CURRENT kernel works without problems.
>
> Is this a pci based radeon
Hi guys,
I just got on my hands today a NEHALEM system:
2 x 5560 Nehalem CPU (2.8GHz, 8MB cache memory, 6.4GT/sec [QPI])
12GB 1333Mhz DDR3 Memory
1 x 500GB SATA HDD
FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE/amd64 install fine, however I seemed to be
having problems w/ its built-in Intel NICs:
igb0: flags=8843 m
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 14:47 +0100, Uwe Laverenz wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 12:36:20PM -0500, Robert Noland wrote:
>
> > I have a patch available for testing at
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~rnoland/drm-update-7-010609.patch.bz2
>
> I tested your patch on 2 different machines:
>
> 1) the i
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 12:36:20PM -0500, Robert Noland wrote:
> I have a patch available for testing at
> http://people.freebsd.org/~rnoland/drm-update-7-010609.patch.bz2
I tested your patch on 2 different machines:
1) the infamous "ThinkPad T43p" ;) running i386:
Sorry, but RELENG_7_1 with yo
Spil Oss wrote:
> Thanks a lot! Will read up on that. (luckily I do speak
> german/swiss-german). From discussions on ##FreeBSD IRC I learned that
> it is not recommended to use lo0 for jails!
Why would that be not recommended?
In fact I think it is a very good idea to use lo0 addresses
for j
Jason C. Wells wrote:
> I am sure there is a reason for it. Upon running mergemaster this time
> through it seemed like there were _a lot_ of files where the only change
> was the version number. I have run to mergemaster on four more hosts. Ugh!
>
> mergemaster -aiU still seems to requi
I am sure there is a reason for it. Upon running mergemaster this time
through it seemed like there were _a lot_ of files where the only change
was the version number. I have run to mergemaster on four more hosts. Ugh!
mergemaster -aiU still seems to require a ton of interaction. Is there
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 12:11:27PM +0100, Harald Weis wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 07:01:02PM -0500, Alex Goncharov wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 11:26:23PM +0100, Roland Smith wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 05:44:03PM +0100, Erwan David wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 05:36:3
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 11:07:04 +0100
"Spil Oss" wrote:
> Early this week, I upgraded from 7.0 to 7.1 (not having 'used' jails
> on 7.0). After creating the jail with
> `ezjail-admin update -i`
> I created a 'ports build' jail
> `ezjail-admin create build 127.0.0.3`
> and forgot to add the alias
Hi Peter,
Thanks a lot! Will read up on that. (luckily I do speak
german/swiss-german). From discussions on ##FreeBSD IRC I learned that
it is not recommended to use lo0 for jails!
On FreeBSD-6.3 I succesfully used lo0/127.0.0.2 for my mysql jail that
needed to be addressed only locally, but ONLY
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 07:01:02PM -0500, Alex Goncharov wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 11:26:23PM +0100, Roland Smith wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 05:44:03PM +0100, Erwan David wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 05:36:35PM CET, Torfinn Ingolfsen
> > > said:
> > > > On Sun, 04 Jan 2009
Greg Byshenk wrote:
> Andrei Kolu wrote:
> > Mike Lempriere wrote:
> > > Hi folks -- sorry to be a nag, but my main production system is barely
> > > limping along on an old kernel with mismatched libraries. I have no
> > > idea what else to do -- please help!
> > > ---
> > > I'm upgradin
Realy my box is obsolet(Atlhon 2.0 - 512 Ram) I try without -j for discard
overheated.
tks again.
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 10:47 PM, Claus Guttesen wrote:
> > Hi Claus, thanks for return. I'm tried this steps below before send the
> > first email and not resolve my problem =/
>
> I notice you run
Hi all,
Is it mandatory to add device mem to jails to enable network via the gateway?
Left ezjail with FreeBSD-6.3 (and a hardware replacement of my server)
and am now starting again with FreeBSD-7.1.
Early this week, I upgraded from 7.0 to 7.1 (not having 'used' jails
on 7.0). After creating th
Edvaldo Silva wrote:
> Please, can someone point a NIC, PCI 2.2 specs, full VLAN capable under
> FreeBSD?
I'm using bge(4) and bce(4) interfaces (Broadcom GBit) and
fxp(4) ones (100 MBit) in enviroments with heavy use of VLANs.
They work very well. There are no problems with the MTU.
Best rega
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 10:10:25AM +0200, Andrei Kolu wrote:
> Mike Lempriere wrote:
> >Hi folks -- sorry to be a nag, but my main production system is barely
> >limping along on an old kernel with mismatched libraries. I have no
> >idea what else to do -- please help!
> >---
> >I'm upgrading 5
Mike Lempriere wrote:
Hi folks -- sorry to be a nag, but my main production system is barely
limping along on an old kernel with mismatched libraries. I have no
idea what else to do -- please help!
---
I'm upgrading 5-stable (was at 5.5) to 6-stable, in preparation for
6-stable to 7-stable.
N
48 matches
Mail list logo
