On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 09:07:19PM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 12:32:25PM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> > Also i didn't see any problem with interfaces going up and down,
> > but that usually happen after some hours of uptime, so i'll let
> > you know if the error
* Patrick Lamaizière ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Ruben van Staveren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> > Though experimental, I'm greatly enjoying
> > http://www.secnetix.de/olli/FreeBSD/svnews/?p=/stable/7
>
> Nice. There is also http://freshbsd.org/ (really cool IMHO).
Thanks; I write/run that.
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 03:08:24PM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 09:07:19PM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
[...]
> > > > > > It seems that your controller supports MSI so you can set a
> > tunable
> > > > > > hw.re.msi_disable to 0 to enable MSI. With MSI you c
Before my last cvsup, I could have cutecom & a custom configuration
app (i.e gpsd) running at the same time on the same serial port. Any
incoming data, both would echo it, and as long as only one was
outputting data, that worked fine too. Now it's 'broke'. I hear
noise about TTY changes, I assum
On 12/10/08, Vlad GALU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/10/08, Mike Jakubik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, December 10, 2008 11:03 am, Jeff Blank wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 04:59:26PM +0200, Vlad GALU wrote:
> > >> I have an application pulling about 220Kpps from a bce(4) c
On 12/10/08, Mike Jakubik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, December 10, 2008 11:03 am, Jeff Blank wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 04:59:26PM +0200, Vlad GALU wrote:
> >> I have an application pulling about 220Kpps from a bce(4) card
> >> (details below). At what seems to be random times,
On 2008-Dec-10 10:55:35 +0100, Søren Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>And you will not use 64bit DMA even if the chipset supports it.
>However I have not seen any chipsets supporting this fail, YMMV as
>usual :)
There's a reference in wikipedia pointing to
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Jakubik wrote:
> On Mon, December 8, 2008 5:22 pm, Mike Jakubik wrote:
>> On Mon, December 8, 2008 5:12 pm, Xin LI wrote:
>>
>>> Which version are you currently using? My previous commit only fixes
>>> the excessive interrupt issue, I think this
On Wed, December 10, 2008 11:03 am, Jeff Blank wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 04:59:26PM +0200, Vlad GALU wrote:
>> I have an application pulling about 220Kpps from a bce(4) card
>> (details below). At what seems to be random times, errors start
>> showing up on that interface (I'm watching it wi
On Mon, December 8, 2008 5:22 pm, Mike Jakubik wrote:
> On Mon, December 8, 2008 5:12 pm, Xin LI wrote:
>
>> Which version are you currently using? My previous commit only fixes
>> the excessive interrupt issue, I think this could be a different
>> problem, I'm taking a look at the code to see if
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 04:59:26PM +0200, Vlad GALU wrote:
> I have an application pulling about 220Kpps from a bce(4) card
> (details below). At what seems to be random times, errors start
> showing up on that interface (I'm watching it with netstat -w1 -I), so
> about 10% of the initial 220Kpps i
Hi,
On 2008-12-10, Danny Braniss wrote:
> from a solaris or linux client, doing a ls(1) of a nfs exported zfs
> file,
> for example: ls /net/zfs-server/h/.zfs/snapshot,
> panics the server. The server is running latest 7.1-prerelease.
This has been reported as PR kern/125149. I have descr
hi,
from a solaris or linux client, doing a ls(1) of a nfs exported zfs
file,
for example: ls /net/zfs-server/h/.zfs/snapshot,
panics the server. The server is running latest 7.1-prerelease.
when client is freebsd, it mostly works, but in a few cases
the server just goes into comma
Just had one of hour webservers flag as down here and on
investigation the machine seems to be struggling due to
a hung vmdaemon process.
top is reporting vmdaemon as using a constant 55.57% CPU
yet CPU time is not increasing:-
last pid: 36492; load averages: 0.04, 0.05, .11 up 89+19:5
Hello. Sorry for crossposting, but I wasn't sure which mailing list
was the most appropriate for this email.
I have an application pulling about 220Kpps from a bce(4) card
(details below). At what seems to be random times, errors start
showing up on that interface (I'm watching it with netstat -w
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 01:18:00PM +0100, Arnaud Houdelette wrote:
> Victor Balada Diaz a écrit :
> >Hello,
> >
> >I got various machines[1] at hetzner.de and I've been having problems
> >with interrupts on FreeBSD 7.0 and now FreeBSD 7.1 -BETA2 in amd64. I've
> >been trying to narrow the problem s
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 03:01:30PM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 12:08:40PM +, Oliver Peter wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 07:52:37PM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
...
> I can use GENERIC kernel again (ie, USB enabled) and so far
> i didn't find any problem y
Hi list,
i am planning to upgrade our main server from 6.1 to 7.1.
The machine has a ICP Vortex GDT8524RZ raid controller which is
handled buy the iir(4) driver.
Since i have seen various discussions in the past about Adaptec no
longer supporting these controllers, driver reaching EOE, data
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 09:07:19PM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 12:32:25PM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 07:28:00PM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 09:59:35AM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Dec
On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 21:07:19 +0900
Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 12:32:25PM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> > As these seems to improve the current situation, is there any
> > chance of merging -current driver in 7.1 before release?
> >
>
> I think re(4)
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 12:08:40PM +, Oliver Peter wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 07:52:37PM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I got various machines[1] at hetzner.de and I've been having problems
> > with interrupts on FreeBSD 7.0 and now FreeBSD 7.1 -BETA2 in amd64. I've
Ken Smith wrote:
> With the 7.0 release I tried giving just the URL
> of the primary site (ftp.freebsd.org) but that proved people don't just
> want easy - they're lazy. For the most part they just clicked on that
> and didn't look around for a mirror. Hence your observation about the
> differenc
Hello,
Thank you for being a subscriber to this list. I hope that you get a
chance to check out my web sites. I have one at http://www.howard.net/hilary
and one also at
http://www.webpost.net/sk/SkatersChoice . I will try to be in the chat
room on Thursday evenings. Go
On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 07:52:37PM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I got various machines[1] at hetzner.de and I've been having problems
> with interrupts on FreeBSD 7.0 and now FreeBSD 7.1 -BETA2 in amd64. I've
> been trying to narrow the problem so someone more knowledgeable than m
Victor Balada Diaz a écrit :
Hello,
I got various machines[1] at hetzner.de and I've been having problems
with interrupts on FreeBSD 7.0 and now FreeBSD 7.1 -BETA2 in amd64. I've
been trying to narrow the problem so someone more knowledgeable than me
is able to fix it. This mail is an other atte
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 15:19 -0600, Kevin Day wrote:
[ Other points were not ignored, just nothing to really say about them
other than "Yes" and/or "Will try", etc. ]
> * More notice to hubs@ before the release notes are generated. The
> releases always come with a "At the time of this writing,
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 12:32:25PM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 07:28:00PM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 09:59:35AM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 03:12:26PM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> > > > On Tue, D
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 07:28:00PM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 09:59:35AM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 03:12:26PM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 07:52:37PM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> >
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 09:59:35AM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 03:12:26PM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 07:52:37PM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I got various machines[1] at hetzner.de and I've been havin
On 10Dec, 2008, at 10:11 , Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
Thanks for explaining me what the flags do. I'm not skilled enough
to create
the DMA quirks but if you could give me some patches i'll test them.
Also
if you have any other idea on what could i test or how can i debug
this
it would be m
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 11:58:12AM +0300, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
> Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> >Digging at linux source code i've found that they do some special things
> >for this chipset that i've been unable to find on our code. This is
> >linux code for my chipset:
> >
> >371
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 03:12:26PM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 07:52:37PM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I got various machines[1] at hetzner.de and I've been having problems
> > with interrupts on FreeBSD 7.0 and now FreeBSD 7.1 -BETA2 in amd64.
Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
Digging at linux source code i've found that they do some special things
for this chipset that i've been unable to find on our code. This is
linux code for my chipset:
371 AHCI_HFLAGS (AHCI_HFLAG_IGN_SERR_INTERNAL |
372
33 matches
Mail list logo
