-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I only have one VM running on one server ...
- --On Tuesday, October 28, 2008 21:14:28 -0700 Bakul Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 00:35:35 -0300 "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> netstat -nr on the 192 server
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 00:35:35 -0300 "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> netstat -nr on the 192 server shows the IP to be at:
>
> > netstat -nr | grep 168.1.100
> 192.168.1.100 52:54:00:12:34:56 UHLW11 fxp0 1128
>
> which is very odd, as that MAC address is n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Tuesday, October 28, 2008 22:08:18 -0400 Michael Proto
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 7:56 PM, Marc G. Fournier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> I'm trying to ru
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 7:56 PM, Marc G. Fournier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> I'm trying to run a QEMU VM on top of a FreeBSD 7.x server ... I've tried
> the
> exact same setup on my desktop, using 192.168.1.x and an fxp device, and it
> all
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm trying to run a QEMU VM on top of a FreeBSD 7.x server ... I've tried the
exact same setup on my desktop, using 192.168.1.x and an fxp device, and it all
works perfectly, but as soon as I do this on another machine on a public IP,
I'm not getti
Lorenzo Perone wrote:
Hi, there's a patch by Bjoern A.Zeeb, available at
http://people.freebsd.org/~bz/bz_jail7-20080920-01-at150161.diff
which succeeds and works well with 7.1-PRERELEASE currently.
I had similar issues to solve and patched several hosts
with it, so far with success.
Bjoern h
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>> This seems to imply that, at last, IPv6 addresses can be used in jails -
>> is that true?
> yes
Woohoo! THANKS! :-)
Michael
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stabl
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Michael Butler wrote:
Lorenzo Perone wrote:
Hi, there's a patch by Bjoern A.Zeeb, available at
http://people.freebsd.org/~bz/bz_jail7-20080920-01-at150161.diff
which succeeds and works well with 7.1-PRERELEASE currently.
I had similar issues to solve and patched several ho
Lorenzo Perone wrote:
> Hi, there's a patch by Bjoern A.Zeeb, available at
> http://people.freebsd.org/~bz/bz_jail7-20080920-01-at150161.diff
>
> which succeeds and works well with 7.1-PRERELEASE currently.
> I had similar issues to solve and patched several hosts
> with it, so far with success.
>
Hi, there's a patch by Bjoern A.Zeeb, available at
http://people.freebsd.org/~bz/bz_jail7-20080920-01-at150161.diff
which succeeds and works well with 7.1-PRERELEASE currently.
I had similar issues to solve and patched several hosts
with it, so far with success.
Bjoern has made an excellent wo
Hi Josh,
I forgot to reply to your second question: there is no real need to
enable COMPAT_43TTY. It is possible that applications use this (by
including ), but if you make sure your ports are up to date,
they should not. is not present on FreeBSD -CURRENT, so I (and
others) already made sure alm
> I suspect you are running a new libc, but forgot to update libutil to
> the latest version as well. Keep in mind that such a setup is not really
> supported.
Yes, exactly my problem. The mystery on my end is now how I managed to
build libc but not libutil. :)
> Ah, right after I finished typing
Hello Josh,
The commits I made two days ago were a little tricky. I made some
modifications to libc and libutil at the same time. Unfortunately, due
to a small case of API misuse in libutil, I couldn't keep older versions
of libutil compatible with the new version of libc.
Below is a small table
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 12:56 PM, Josh Carroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just built world from RELENG_7 sources csup'd this morning, and it
> appears the change to src/lib/libc/stdlib/grantpt.c has broken sshd.
>
> I see the following when I attempt to login:
>
> Oct 28 12:32:34 pflog sshd[782
I just built world from RELENG_7 sources csup'd this morning, and it
appears the change to src/lib/libc/stdlib/grantpt.c has broken sshd.
I see the following when I attempt to login:
Oct 28 12:32:34 pflog sshd[78236]: fatal: openpty returns device for
which ttyname fails.
Oct 28 12:32:34 pflog ss
Thanks for the answer.
But as you can see in my post one of the steps was to downgrade to 7.0-
p5 and the problem was still there.
That's why I'm so confuse.
On 27-Oct-08, at 11:54 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 07:53:17PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27,
Sorry for my ESL :).
On 28-Oct-08, at 9:03 AM, Sujit Karataparambil wrote:
Sorry Just donot understand what you are saying.
On 10/28/08, Jose Amengual <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Guys.
I will describe de steps that I did to solve this problem that I
still don't
understand.
Like my fi
on 27/10/2008 21:59 Jeremy Chadwick said the following:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 08:50:44PM +0100, martinko wrote:
>> Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 07:52:01PM +0100, martinko wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Now, does the timeout cause loss of any data? Is there any
Sorry Just donot understand what you are saying.
On 10/28/08, Jose Amengual <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Guys.
>
> I will describe de steps that I did to solve this problem that I still don't
> understand.
>
> Like my first post, I installed FreeBSD with the install cd
> 7.0-STABLE-200807-i386-
On Monday 27 October 2008 20:03:21 Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> I had no idea users were blindly uncommenting examples in
well seems you're new in support business then :)
the issue might be the reason why weapons are not delivered with roles in the
chambers ... so developers probably should take ca
Charles Sprickman wrote:
> [...]
> Is there any firewall hackery to be had that can at least let me do IP
> based virtual hosts for web hosting?
A common solution is to put the jail on a localhost IP
(e.g. 127.0.0.2, whatever). The apache inside is bound
to several arbitrary port numbers. Fo
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 12:31:29PM +0200, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On RELENG_7 (various versions between june and a few days ago) i
> noticed that sometimes ld.so starts using huge amounts of memory
> and CPU, both in terms of SIZE and RES.
>
> I saw it first on 3 different machines doing a portupgrad
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Charles Sprickman wrote:
Hello all,
I've been searching around and have come up with no current discussions on
this issue. I'll keep it brief:
In 7.0 or 7.1 is there any provision to have multiple IP addresses in a jail?
Subscribe to the freebsd-jail mailinglist and c
23 matches
Mail list logo
