"Eduardo Meyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello :)
>
> Please, follow:
>
> # ifconfig rl0 ether 00:02:4f:0a:ce:f3 inet 192.168.2.12 netmask
> 255.255.255.0 ifconfig: can't set link-level netmask or broadcast
>
> # ifconfig rl0 inet 192.168.2.12 netmask 255.255.255.0 ether
> 00:02:4f:0a:ce:f3
I was running 6.3-RELEASE-p2 on my ThinkPad notebook until 3-Oct-2008
when I csup'd and built RELENG_6_4 (6.4-RC1). All went well for weeks
until I took the notebook off-site to a place with no network and saw it
fail to boot. This morning I updated to the latest RELENG_6_4 and the
problem persist
> > > hw.ata.ata_dma_check_80pin="0"
>
> Unfortunately this useful tunable is unavailable for 6.x.
Ahh, but this is 7.1-BETA2 on amd64 - it should be available there, yes ?
The manual page says it should work, and I have found the point in
the source code where it is supposed to interpret it. Ther
On Tuesday 21 October 2008 06:13 pm, Pete French wrote:
> > Try setting the following in /boot/loader.conf:
> >
> > hw.ata.ata_dma_check_80pin="0"
>
> Now that looked promising, but unfortunately it doesnt help. Even
> with this set I still get the same message. If this is supposed to
> disbale the
> Try setting the following in /boot/loader.conf:
>
> hw.ata.ata_dma_check_80pin="0"
Now that looked promising, but unfortunately it doesnt help. Even
with this set I still get the same message. If this is supposed to
disbale the check (as it appears) then I am even more puzzled.
-pete.
_
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 04:54:14PM -0200, Eduardo Meyer wrote:
> Is there another way to check if a certain interface supports polling,
> other than reading polling(4)? I would like to have a script to check
> it, issuing something like
>
> ifconfig -v -m
>
> How can I list all NIC capabilities?
2008/10/21 Eduardo Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Is there another way to check if a certain interface supports polling,
> other than reading polling(4)? I would like to have a script to check
> it, issuing something like
>
> ifconfig -v -m
>
> How can I list all NIC capabilities? Would polling be l
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 04:48:50PM -0200, Eduardo Meyer wrote:
> Hello :)
>
> Please, follow:
>
> # ifconfig rl0 ether 00:02:4f:0a:ce:f3 inet 192.168.2.12 netmask 255.255.255.0
> ifconfig: can't set link-level netmask or broadcast
>
> # ifconfig rl0 inet 192.168.2.12 netmask 255.255.255.0 ether
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 04:48:50PM -0200, Eduardo Meyer wrote:
> Hello :)
Hi.
> Please, follow:
>
> # ifconfig rl0 ether 00:02:4f:0a:ce:f3 inet 192.168.2.12 netmask 255.255.255.0
> ifconfig: can't set link-level netmask or broadcast
>
> # ifconfig rl0 inet 192.168.2.12 netmask 255.255.255.0 et
On October 21, 2008 11:48 am Eduardo Meyer wrote:
> Please, follow:
>
> # ifconfig rl0 ether 00:02:4f:0a:ce:f3 inet 192.168.2.12 netmask
> 255.255.255.0 ifconfig: can't set link-level netmask or broadcast
>
> # ifconfig rl0 inet 192.168.2.12 netmask 255.255.255.0 ether
> 00:02:4f:0a:ce:f3 ifconfig:
Is there another way to check if a certain interface supports polling,
other than reading polling(4)? I would like to have a script to check
it, issuing something like
ifconfig -v -m
How can I list all NIC capabilities? Would polling be listed if the
driver supports?
--
===
Eduardo Mey
Hello :)
Please, follow:
# ifconfig rl0 ether 00:02:4f:0a:ce:f3 inet 192.168.2.12 netmask 255.255.255.0
ifconfig: can't set link-level netmask or broadcast
# ifconfig rl0 inet 192.168.2.12 netmask 255.255.255.0 ether 00:02:4f:0a:ce:f3
ifconfig: ether: bad value
# ifconfig rl0 inet 192.168.2.12
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 07:44:31PM +0100, Pete French wrote:
> ...
> Is there a way to turn the test off
> ...
Try setting the following in /boot/loader.conf:
hw.ata.ata_dma_check_80pin="0"
You can see the description of this, and other tunables, in the ata(4)
man page.
--
| Jeremy Chadwick
I am trying out BEAT2 on a machine here, installing onto a compact
flash card, but when I boot I get the error above. This is slightly
puzzling as the CF card is in an adapter which plugs directly into
the motherboard.
If I move the card to dangling off the end of a cable, the warning
goes away an
2008/10/21 pluknet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/9/28 Edwin Groothuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> I have made an update for the top(1) utility in the FreeBSD base
>> system to get it from the 3.5b12 version to the 3.8b1 version.
>>
>> I have tried them on the amd64 architecture on FreeBSD -current and
>>
2008/9/28 Edwin Groothuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have made an update for the top(1) utility in the FreeBSD base
> system to get it from the 3.5b12 version to the 3.8b1 version.
>
> I have tried them on the amd64 architecture on FreeBSD -current and
> FreeBSD 7.0 and on the i386 architecture on Fr
2008/9/29 Jaakko Heinonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 2008-09-28, Edwin Groothuis wrote:
>> > Swap: 3000M Total, 181M Used, 2819M Free, 6% Inuse
>> > sysctlnametomib: No such file or directory
>> >
>> > And no processes.
>>
>> I didn't expect it not to work on 6.x, I will play around with it
>> to
Hi Pyun!
Sorry, I am wrong in my reported case.
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 18:53:56 +0900
Norikatsu Shigemura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hmm, that's odd. I don't think there is significant change of re(4)
> > in that time window. Would you show me the revision number of
> > if_re.c of old cu
At 05:57 AM 10/21/2008, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
I've even tried /etc/rc.d/pf restart but that doesn't fix it.. It's very
perplexing :(
Strange, Even doing
/sbin/pfctl -Fall -f /etc/pf.conf
does not help as part of ppp.linkup ? Perhaps confirm its actually
working as expected. e.g. wrap a sm
martinko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1) I wonder if I could use mergemaster to compare 2 directories and
> merge differencies as neccessary. To explain: I have all config files I
> touch saved with full path somewhere in /root. And therefore I'd like
> mergemaster or some other tool to c
Hello,
we've just updated one of our test machines from FreeBSD 7.0 to
FreeBSD 7.1 -BETA 2 using freebsd-update. After upgrading it
we can see on /var/log/messages a lot of errors like this one:
Oct 21 13:17:40 yac kernel: re0: watchdog timeout
Oct 21 13:17:40 yac kernel: re0: link state changed
On Wednesday 15 October 2008 13:39:51 Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> On Wednesday 15 October 2008 13:08:02 Mike Tancsa wrote:
> > > very odd it only just started doing it though..
> >
> > do you have tun0 in () on your nat statement ?
> >
> > eg.
> > nat on tun0 from 192.168.23.0/24 to any -> (tun0)
>
>
On RELENG_7 (various versions between june and a few days ago) i
noticed that sometimes ld.so starts using huge amounts of memory
and CPU, both in terms of SIZE and RES.
I saw it first on 3 different machines doing a portupgrade -a
while X was active, but perhaps it is Xorg-related because even
st
Certain combinations of nVidia chips will cause silent data corruption
under FreeBSD. Google "freebsd mcp55 corruption" for more information.
---
Daniel Eriksson (http://www.toomuchdata.se/)
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freeb
24 matches
Mail list logo
