On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 03:18:36PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Andrew Thompson wrote:
> > Pete French wrote:
> > > > The bce driver is not properly generating link state events.
> > >
> > > OK, that explains why it doesnt failover - but why does looking at it
> > > with ifconfig make a diff
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 04:00:56PM +0200, Marian Hettwer wrote:
> Hi Oliver,
>
> On Fri, 8 Aug 2008 15:18:36 +0200 (CEST), Oliver Fromme
> >
> > Shouldn't that be considered a security flaw? After all,
> > you can perform "ifconfig $IF" inside a jail to list the
> > interface configuration, but
On Fri, 8 Aug 2008, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Andrew Thompson wrote:
> > ifconfig will cause the media status to be read from the hardware at
> > which time the link change is generated as it is different to the stored
> > value.
>
> Shouldn't that be considered a security flaw? After all,
> you
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 5:13 AM, Harald Weis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there anyone out there who has installed FreeBSD on the above Sony
> laptop ?
>
> Both ''cat filename > /dev/dsp0.0'' or ''vlc cdda:///dev/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> are OK.
>
> If I run ''cdcontrol -f /dev/acd0 play'', there is
On 2008-Aug-08 14:36:42 +0200, Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>For example, in amd64 mode there are twice as many CPU
>registers available, enabling better optimizations for
>the C compiler. Furthermore those registers are twice
>as long, which means that 64bit quantities can be handled
We have been trying to build bsnmpd 1.12 on freebsd 5.3 but have many weird
issues building snmp_bridge, snmp_hostres & snmp_mibII modules.
The errors seem to come from compiler strictness
cc -fpic -DPIC -O -pipe
-I/work2/vrajan/head/products/rapid/freebsd5/src/usr.sbin/bsnmpd/modules/snmp_mibI
IPv4 and IPv6. I will post a further e-mail
announcement along with patch set and schedule in a day or two once it's
prepared.
Patches, which require the MFC of rwlock try-locking, which I did earlier
today:
http://www.watson.org/~robert/freebsd/netperf/20080808-7stable-rwlock-inpcb
> Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 16:34:01 -0400
> From: Mike Tancsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> At 04:04 PM 8/8/2008, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> >Today I was unable to build a new kernel for 7-Stable. It dies when
> >linking the kernel, seemingly because of not finding the definitions for
> >some nfs stuff. I don
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 01:04:47PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> Today I was unable to build a new kernel for 7-Stable. It dies when
> linking the kernel, seemingly because of not finding the definitions for
> some nfs stuff. I don't use nfs and always exclude both server and
> client from my kerne
At 04:04 PM 8/8/2008, Kevin Oberman wrote:
Today I was unable to build a new kernel for 7-Stable. It dies when
linking the kernel, seemingly because of not finding the definitions for
some nfs stuff. I don't use nfs and always exclude both server and
client from my kernel. (Long config attached,
Today I was unable to build a new kernel for 7-Stable. It dies when
linking the kernel, seemingly because of not finding the definitions for
some nfs stuff. I don't use nfs and always exclude both server and
client from my kernel. (Long config attached, if the list does not strip
it.)
MAKE=make sh
OK, I just got access to a machine, am going to install and see if I
can repro this
this afternoon.
Jack
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Markus Vervier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jack Vogel schrieb:
>>
>> "me too" 's are of little help. Please elaborate on your "exact same",
>> since
>> each
Hello,
I've been having spurrious crash troubles with this box a while now
and I haven't been able to figure out why. I've ran a couple memtest
passes on it and it didn't pick up anything. Here's a backtrace I've
been able to obtain. The kernel config is at the end. It's the generic
kernel with UL
Mike Tancsa schrieb:
If you manually type,
dhclient em0
No, even if I type ifconfig em0 down && ifconfig em0 up it won´t work.
The interface just gets no link until I reload the driver with a cable
plugged.
--
Markus
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org m
At 01:56 PM 8/8/2008, Markus Vervier wrote:
3) Boot FreeBSD. Let it pass the DHCP phase (ifconfig_em0="DHCP") until
login appears.
4) Attach the cable to the NIC.
5) Voila... no link.
<-->
If you manually type,
dhclient em0
does it work for you then ?
---Mike
__
Jack Vogel schrieb:
"me too" 's are of little help. Please elaborate on your "exact same", since
each person's perception will be slightly different.
Hi Jack,
maybe read it like: Thinkpad X60 1706GMG affected too, so the problem is
not specific to Martins machine.
I can write the same s
Harald Weis wrote:
> Both ''cat filename > /dev/dsp0.0'' or ''vlc cdda:///dev/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> are OK.
>
> If I run ''cdcontrol -f /dev/acd0 play'', there is no sound.
> But the output of ''cdcontrol -f /dev/acd0 status audio'' is alright.
> (same behaviour for cd0 instead of acd0)
Are
On Thursday 26 June 2008 11:12:33 pm Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 23:53:44 +0200
> > From: Volker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > On 12/23/-58 20:59, Kelly Black wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I have a problem with loader. I recently upgraded from 6_r
Is there anyone out there who has installed FreeBSD on the above Sony
laptop ?
Both ''cat filename > /dev/dsp0.0'' or ''vlc cdda:///dev/[EMAIL PROTECTED] are
OK.
If I run ''cdcontrol -f /dev/acd0 play'', there is no sound.
But the output of ''cdcontrol -f /dev/acd0 status audio'' is alright.
(sa
"me too" 's are of little help. Please elaborate on your "exact same", since
each person's perception will be slightly different.
So far I have heard nothing that sounds like a driver issue.
Jack
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 5:50 AM, Markus Vervier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I just stumbl
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
I am out of the office until 2008-08-10.
I will respond to your message when I return.
Please contact:
- Erik Svennevig -- team/project manager
- Pavan Gulati -- team/project manager
- Bo Heegaard Hansen -- people manager
- Lene Buch-Larsen -- resource deployment manager
Note: This is an autom
Hi Oliver,
On Fri, 8 Aug 2008 15:18:36 +0200 (CEST), Oliver Fromme
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Thompson wrote:
> > Pete French wrote:
> > > > The bce driver is not properly generating link state events.
> > >
> > > OK, that explains why it doesnt failover - but why does looking at
it
>
Unga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is i386 RELENG_7.
>
> Following section of the /usr/src/usr.sbin/sysinstall/Makefile does not
> generate C code properly:
>
> makedevs.c: Makefile rtermcap
> echo '#include ' > makedevs.c
> ${RTERMCAP} ansi | \
>
Andrew Thompson wrote:
> Pete French wrote:
> > > The bce driver is not properly generating link state events.
> >
> > OK, that explains why it doesnt failover - but why does looking at it
> > with ifconfig make a difference ? surely that should be 'read only ?
>
> ifconfig will cause the
Ask Bjørn Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We got 4 new SuperMicro boxes[1] with Xeon 3320 processors. They'll
> be used as firewalls / very basic routers (our network on one side,
> the world via a /29 on the other side). We currently use Soekris and
> PC Engine boxes for this (with
Hi,
I just stumbled upon this thread. I experience the exact same behaviour
as Martin on my Thinkpad X60:
Thinkpad X60 Model: 1706GMG
BIOS-Version 2.15 (7BETD4WW)
FreeBSD 7.0 STABLE amd64 (from about two weeks ago) - same situtation on
7.0-RELEASE i386
--
Markus
___
Eugene Kazarinov wrote:
>
> > [...]
> > # 4. `make installkernel KERNCONF=YOUR_KERNEL_HERE' (default is GENERIC).
> > # 5. `reboot' (in single user mode: boot -s from the loader prompt).
> > # 6. `mergemaster -p'
> > # 7. `make installworld'
> > [...]
>
> Pls tell me what for I n
On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 05:27:53PM +0100, Pete French wrote:
> I have a very odd problem here - two interfaces bundled using lagg
> in 'failover' mode, so one interface is active and the other not being
> used. if the carrier drops on the active one I expect it to
> failover, but it doesnt.
>
On Friday 08 August 2008 20:09:03 Vincent Hoffman wrote:
> Warren Liddell wrote:
> >> I would upgrade to a -RELEASE branch from source then try again.
> >>
> >> Vince
> >
> > change my releng to 7 in the supfile and do a csup then do world & kernel
> > and go from there ?
>
> RELENG_7_0 for the -R
Warren Liddell wrote:
I would upgrade to a -RELEASE branch from source then try again.
Vince
change my releng to 7 in the supfile and do a csup then do world & kernel and
go from there ?
RELENG_7_0 for the -RELEASE
7 is -STABLE
Vince
__
> I would upgrade to a -RELEASE branch from source then try again.
>
> Vince
change my releng to 7 in the supfile and do a csup then do world & kernel and
go from there ?
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/list
> no for versions of FreeBSD beyond 6.3 its in base and you dont need to
> install it seperately to upgrade between versions.
> freebsd-update -r 7.1-RELEASE upgrade
> seems to have an effect where 7.0-RELEASE no longer does. I have CCed
> freebsd-stable@ on this to see if anyone knows if this is i
Warren Liddell wrote:
no for versions of FreeBSD beyond 6.3 its in base and you dont need to
install it seperately to upgrade between versions.
freebsd-update -r 7.1-RELEASE upgrade
seems to have an effect where 7.0-RELEASE no longer does. I have CCed
freebsd-stable@ on this to see if anyone know
Warren Liddell wrote:
On Thursday 07 August 2008 23:18:34 Marc Coyles wrote:
If i have read the man pages correct the command im using being ...
# freebsd-update upgrade -r 7.0-CURRENT
# sh freebsd-update.sh -f freebsd-update.conf -r 7.0-RELEASE upgrade
followed eventually by...
#
35 matches
Mail list logo
