Re: Marvell Yukon 88E8062 - media selection problem

2008-07-06 Thread Krzysztof Jędruczyk
Pyun YongHyeon pisze: Would you try the patch at the following URL? http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/msk/msk.88E8040.patch5 The diff generated against HEAD and it could be cleanly applied to 7-stable. 7-stable also has a couple of important bug fixes. So it would be better to use 7-stable.

Re: Makefile in FreeBSD 7.0 Stable

2008-07-06 Thread Clifton Royston
On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 07:04:52PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > -- Original message -- > From: Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > I have a fresh install of FreeBSD 7.0 but it it seems several system > > > related > > modul

Re: Makefile in FreeBSD 7.0 Stable

2008-07-06 Thread Kris Kennaway
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -- Original message -- From: Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a fresh install of FreeBSD 7.0 but it it seems several system related modules are broken. One I would like to have a solution on urgently is t

Re: Makefile in FreeBSD 7.0 Stable

2008-07-06 Thread norwoh
-- Original message -- From: Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I have a fresh install of FreeBSD 7.0 but it it seems several system > > related > modules are broken. One I would like to have a solution on urgently is the > "Makefil

Re: Makefile in FreeBSD 7.0 Stable

2008-07-06 Thread Kris Kennaway
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a fresh install of FreeBSD 7.0 but it it seems several system related modules are broken. One I would like to have a solution on urgently is the "Makefile". I am not able to compile or install any program with it. The errors are too many no matter which applicat

Makefile in FreeBSD 7.0 Stable

2008-07-06 Thread norwoh
I have a fresh install of FreeBSD 7.0 but it it seems several system related modules are broken. One I would like to have a solution on urgently is the "Makefile". I am not able to compile or install any program with it. The errors are too many no matter which application I try to install from

Re: expand_number(3) silently truncates numeric part of the argument to 32 bit on i386, light impact on gjournal

2008-07-06 Thread Jilles Tjoelker
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 04:16:25PM -0400, Alexandre Sunny Kovalenko wrote: > I honestly don't know whether it should or should not do it, and if it > should not, what errno should be set to. Program below gives following > output on RELENG_7 as of June 28th: > sunny:RabbitsDen>./expand_number 5368