Re: Heads UP - MFC for em coming shortly

2007-10-06 Thread Bartosz Fabianowski
/home/obj/src/sys/dev/em/if_em.c: In function `em_allocate_intr': /home/obj/src/sys/dev/em/if_em.c:2647: warning: passing arg 6 of `bus_setup_intr' from incompatible pointer type /home/obj/src/sys/dev/em/if_em.c:2647: error: too many arguments to function `bus_setup_intr' This has just been fi

freebsd ipsc -a output missing

2007-10-06 Thread The Presence
I have a generic kernel on my FreeBSD 6.2 system, and I am getting errors regarding PMAP_SHPGPERPROC which is set at 201 (default). Because the system is a heavy load websever, this happens quite often. I want to calculate the proper value to to it to, but my ipcs software isn't working. Anyo

Re: Heads UP - MFC for em coming shortly

2007-10-06 Thread Erik Trulsson
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 10:08:39PM +0300, Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote: > On 10/6/07, Eugene Grosbein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 01:28:20PM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote: > > > > > I am preparing to update the em driver to the equivalent of my > > > 6.6.6 driver. Just doi

Re: Heads UP - MFC for em coming shortly

2007-10-06 Thread Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri
On 10/6/07, Eugene Grosbein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 01:28:20PM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote: > > > I am preparing to update the em driver to the equivalent of my > > 6.6.6 driver. Just doing some last minute sanity checking, I > > hope to the checkin before end of day. > > T

Re: Heads UP - MFC for em coming shortly

2007-10-06 Thread Eugene Grosbein
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 01:28:20PM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote: > I am preparing to update the em driver to the equivalent of my > 6.6.6 driver. Just doing some last minute sanity checking, I > hope to the checkin before end of day. The MFC broke compilation of kernel containing both device em and op

Re: Quation about HZ kernel option

2007-10-06 Thread Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri
On 10/5/07, Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Artem Kuchin wrote: > > > Hello! > > > > What value of HZ option would you recommend for a hosting (web) server > > with a lot of processes (about 900) and polling off (as decided from > > previous discussion polling is useles