On 10/5/07, Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Artem Kuchin wrote: > > > Hello! > > > > What value of HZ option would you recommend for a hosting (web) server > > with a lot of processes (about 900) and polling off (as decided from > > previous discussion polling is useless in this situation). > > Is this an SMP system? If so you'd probably be well served by testing the > latest 7.0-current (which will soon be a beta for 7.0-release) with the > ULE scheduler. That's likely to have more benefit for you than changing > HZ, although setting it to 100 is probably going to be better than 1000 > for reasons others have already mentioned. > > hth, > > Doug > > -- > > This .signature sanitized for your protection
Hello, Thank you for the nice discussion guys, I have server with dual xeon cpus, and C2D I switched kern.hz to 100 instead of 1000. -- Regards, -Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri Arab Portal http://www.WeArab.Net/ _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
