Re: Problems installing JDK 1.5

On 07. Mrz 2007, at 8:12, Tom Samplonius wrote: There are some license restrictions on distribution of jdk binaries. In order to be distributable, jdk binaries need to pass Sun's test suite (TCK). So the Diablo binary passes, and is distributation. The port, is just source, and does no

Re: Boot prompt for Intel AMT

> On Mar 6, 2007, at 1:04 PM, Jack Vogel wrote: > > > Yes, my bad, I spoke too quickly, it does use IP, sorry, > > I still find SOL much more descriptive of what I think about > > the whole apparatus however :) > > :-) > > Personally, I really like the Sun ILOM processors, even though they > d

Re: Problems installing JDK 1.5

- "Juergen Nickelsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... > But indeed I was ignorant of the diablo port. What is the relation > between these two ports anyway? I do not really get the difference, > in spite of . ... There are some license r

Re: ping's seem to hang ... 'zoneli' state?

Marc G. Fournier wrote: [...] > Here's what I have right now: > > __FBSDID("$FreeBSD: src/sys/kern/kern_mbuf.c,v 1.9.2.9 2007/02/11 03:31:18 > mohans Exp $"); > * $FreeBSD: src/sys/sys/mbuf.h,v 1.170.2.7 2007/02/11 03:31:19 mohans Exp $ > * $FreeBSD: src/sys/vm/uma.h,v 1.22.2.8 2007/02/11 03:31

Re: Processes get stuck in "ufs" state

On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 05:22:38AM +0300, Oleg Derevenetz wrote: > Hi ! > > Sometimes (once a week approximately) I have a problem with the same > symptoms described here on SMP FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE with dual AMD Opteron(tm) > Processor 850: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=104406&c

Re: LOR #193

On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 10:44:37PM +0100, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > Hello. > > I'm experiencing the above mentioned LOR on a 6.2p1/amd64 box (running > gmirror and SMP if that matters). > > With reference to your question on > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2006-November/0310

Processes get stuck in "ufs" state

Hi ! Sometimes (once a week approximately) I have a problem with the same symptoms described here on SMP FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE with dual AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 850: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=104406&cat= Sometimes (apparently when CPU load suddenly goes up) all processes that in

Processes get stuck in "ufs" state

Hi ! Sometimes (once a week approximately) I have a problem with the same symptoms described here on SMP FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE with dual AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 850: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=104406&cat= Sometimes (apparently when CPU load suddenly goes up) all processes that

Re: Boot prompt for Intel AMT

On Tue, 06 Mar 2007 13:09:14 -0800 Jack Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, this was a concern while i was at IBM as well, they were > talking about configurations that would have the 'management' > net seperated out from the public. That seems very expensive > on infrastructure to me. Course

Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed

Artem Kuchin wrote: >> See here: >> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2007-March/033494.html > > Yes, that what i've got in the list and this how it was in the putty > terminal > originally. Nothing is missing. I don't know why open left parentesis > are there. The block under the

LOR #193

Hello. I'm experiencing the above mentioned LOR on a 6.2p1/amd64 box (running gmirror and SMP if that matters). With reference to your question on http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2006-November/031048.html: What application you run that triggers the LOR ? Bacula, I guess

Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed

See here: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2007-March/033494.html Yes, that what i've got in the list and this how it was in the putty terminal originally. Nothing is missing. I don't know why open left parentesis are there. -- Artem __

Re: Boot prompt for Intel AMT

On 3/6/07, Vivek Khera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mar 6, 2007, at 1:04 PM, Jack Vogel wrote: > Yes, my bad, I spoke too quickly, it does use IP, sorry, > I still find SOL much more descriptive of what I think about > the whole apparatus however :) :-) Personally, I really like the Sun ILOM

Re: Clamav-90_2 Lockup with freebsd 6.2

At 10:55 AM 3/1/2007, Renato Botelho wrote: > > FYI: https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=307#c8 I found the problem, a bad REINPLACE_CMD was changing wrong var on configure scripts, don't respecting PTHREAD_LIBS. It's fixed now on 0.90_3. Any chance to update the port to use 0.90

Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed

Artem Kuchin wrote: >> a) It looks like your message was weirdly truncated - whole "rectangles" >> of text are missing from the results on the right-hand-side. Maybe you >> copied it through Excel? > > Ummm... hmmm.. i checked the message in the list, nothimng is missing. > Just like it was in th

Re: Boot prompt for Intel AMT

On Mar 6, 2007, at 1:04 PM, Jack Vogel wrote: Yes, my bad, I spoke too quickly, it does use IP, sorry, I still find SOL much more descriptive of what I think about the whole apparatus however :) :-) Personally, I really like the Sun ILOM processors, even though they do boot an embedded lin

RE: Clamav-90_2 Lockup with freebsd 6.2

Hi, I am running latest CVSUP branch today. Still having the same problem. Only way to reduce cpu usage is to increase maxthreads as others mentioned. What version it is fixed? is it not submitted through ports yet? Regards Dimi -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: Clamav-90_2 Lockup with freebsd 6.2

Had a similar behavior here, but with other MTA (qmail, clamdscan getting used from simscan). After raising MaxThreads from 10 (default) to 40 CPU usage got back to its normal consuming level. No idea if this info can help, but that was my recent experience. __

Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed

Artem Kuchin wrote: I used unixbenchmark for measure overall perfomance of three machines of different generations and with different OS versions. See for your self and compare results with machine cost. Hope this will be usefull for someone. Several things: a) It looks like your message was w

Re: Boot prompt for Intel AMT

On 3/6/07, Artem Kuchin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I hope some people will understand what i am talking about, because >> the technology, i think, is not very popular, but can come VERY handy. >> >> Intel AMT Serial over LAN (SOL, why is it called 'over LAN' if it is really >> 'OVER IP'?) all

Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed

Artem Kuchin wrote: > I used unixbenchmark for measure overall perfomance of three machines of > different generations and with different OS versions. See for your self and > compare results with machine cost. > Hope this will be usefull for someone. Several things: a) It looks like your message

Re: Problems installing JDK 1.5

Sam Baskinger wrote: Juergen Nickelsen wrote: On Feb 27 2007, Chris Timmons wrote: Don't forget that the linux JDK will want you to have linprocfs mounted. I recently had a similar build experience of jdk-1.5.0p4 which cleared up fine after I remembered about linprocfs. linprocfs /compat/

Re: ping's seem to hang ... 'zoneli' state?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - --On Wednesday, March 07, 2007 00:44:25 +0800 "??/LI Xin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Marc G. Fournier wrote: > [...] >> Can someone comment on whether I just missed the commit on my last cvsup, or >> if I'm hitting the same problem but in a di

Re: Clamav-90_2 Lockup with freebsd 6.2

Hello, On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 04:45:37PM +, Pete French wrote: > > last days with exim connecting to the local socket I have exim > > now connecting to localhot:3310 by tcp. The difference is, that before > > clamd scanned all files in the directory given by exim. Effectively exim > > was

Re: Clamav-90_2 Lockup with freebsd 6.2

> last days with exim connecting to the local socket I have exim > now connecting to localhot:3310 by tcp. The difference is, that before > clamd scanned all files in the directory given by exim. Effectively exim > was unpacking the whole MIME structure and placed all parts in the dir Interest

Re: ping's seem to hang ... 'zoneli' state?

Marc G. Fournier wrote: [...] > Can someone comment on whether I just missed the commit on my last cvsup, or > if > I'm hitting the same problem but in a different way? I think so. Try patching your system with: src/sys/kern/kern_mbuf.c,v 1.9.2.9 src/sys/sys/mbuf.h,v 1.170.2.7 src/sys/vm/uma.h

Re: ping's seem to hang ... 'zoneli' state?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - --On Tuesday, March 06, 2007 18:59:04 +0300 Anton Yuzhaninov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Marc, > > You wrote on Tuesday, March 6, 2007, 6:10:45 PM: > > MGF> Does this show anything? I can't kill the processes, even with kill -9 > ... MGF>

Re: Clamav-90_2 Lockup with freebsd 6.2

At 10:39 AM 3/6/2007, Oliver Brandmueller wrote: last days with exim connecting to the local socket I have exim now connecting to localhot:3310 by tcp. The difference is, that before Perhaps this is why we were not seeing the high CPU usage post our upgrade, as we have the milters on our sendm

Re: Clamav-90_2 Lockup with freebsd 6.2

Hi, On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 11:19:40AM -0300, Carlos Horowicz wrote: > Anybody tried this additionally in /etc/libmap.conf ? > > [/usr/local/lib/libclamav.so.1] > libpthread.so.2 libthr.so.2 > > clamav-0.90_2 reduced CPU consumption for me on 6.2-Stable since I > added the two sections

Re: ping's seem to hang ... 'zoneli' state?

Hello Marc, You wrote on Tuesday, March 6, 2007, 6:10:45 PM: MGF> Does this show anything? I can't kill the processes, even with kill -9 ... MGF> this happens consistently just after 3 days uptime on a kernel built "Fri Feb MGF> 23 07:47:20 AST 2007", and the interface is an fxp0 device ... MG

Re: ARP problem with 6.2-STABLE Intel PRO/1000 NIC, latest em

On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 10:24:46AM +, Chris Rees wrote: > > If your NIC is knackered, where are you from? I can post you one I'm > not using, instead of you buying one. It's a Realtek PCI 8139 10/100 > Mb/s. Let me know if you're interested. Thank you very much for the offer! However, I have

ping's seem to hang ... 'zoneli' state?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Does this show anything? I can't kill the processes, even with kill -9 ... this happens consistently just after 3 days uptime on a kernel built "Fri Feb 23 07:47:20 AST 2007", and the interface is an fxp0 device ... # ps auxl | grep ping root

Re: ping's seem to hang ... 'zoneli' state?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 vmstat 1 shows: # vmstat 1 procs memory pagedisks faults cpu r b w avmfre flt re pi po fr sr da0 da1 in sy cs us sy id 0 1577 0 7813112 657312 1553 9 1 1 1325 68 0 0 569 4774 23

Re: Boot prompt for Intel AMT (serial port redirection on Intel AMT)

- Original Message - From: "Tom Judge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Artem Kuchin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Jack Vogel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 2:04 PM Subject: Re: Boot prompt for Intel AMT Artem Kuchin wrote: Artem Kuchin wrote: We have

Re: panic: kmem_malloc(16384): kmem_map too small: md-mounted /tmp filled up

On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 01:14:29PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > On Monday 05 March 2007 08:23, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > = > How will it break them?  swap backing only touches swap if there is > = > memory pressure, i.e. precisely the situation in which malloc backing > = > will panic. > = > = I forg

sunlabel trouble

Hi, This is on 6.2-STABLE, updated last week. I've added a new ~250 GB disc to my netra X1. It's working OK but somehow sunlabel is unwilling to install the bootstrap code on the disc because of some sizing issue with the c partition (whole disk). Even though sysinstall let me partition the d

Is SATA II supported in 6.2-stable?

Hi! I just setup a new machine and while it is supposed to be full SATA II i still see these lines in at kernel init: Mar 6 14:00:09 aaa kernel: ad8: 305245MB at ata4-master SATA150 Mar 6 14:00:09 aaa kernel: ad10: 305245MB at ata5-master SATA150 As you see, it says SATA150 , while the d

Re: Boot prompt for Intel AMT

Artem Kuchin wrote: Artem Kuchin wrote: We have a number of Dell PowerEdge 2950's that we boot using the built in SOL, which does run over IP as we use it across a routed VPN backbone (server in the data center, console in the office). We have found that the IPMI serial port is connected to

Re: Boot prompt for Intel AMT

Artem Kuchin wrote: I hope some people will understand what i am talking about, because the technology, i think, is not very popular, but can come VERY handy. Intel AMT Serial over LAN (SOL, why is it called 'over LAN' if it is really 'OVER IP'?) allows to boot into BIOS of a remote machine a

Re: ARP problem with 6.2-STABLE Intel PRO/1000 NIC, latest em

On 3/4/07, Duane Whitty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 11:30:07PM -0700, Mark Costlow wrote: > The Machine: > > I have a dual Xeon 5130 machine, Supermicro motherboard, with > the 82563EB NIC. From dmesg: > > CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU5130 @ 2.00GHz (2000.08-MHz 6

panic: vinvalbuf: dirty bufs

I was ripping one CD (SCSI CD-drive) and inserting another CD into an ATA CD-DRIVE. Suddenly the machine paniced... Although I have the crash dump, it seems corrupted -- kgdb can't print out the stack. The panic is: "vinvalbuf: dirty bufs". Please, advise. Thanks! -mi __

Re: Boot prompt for Intel AMT

Artem Kuchin wrote: I hope some people will understand what i am talking about, because the technology, i think, is not very popular, but can come VERY handy. Intel AMT Serial over LAN (SOL, why is it called 'over LAN' if it is really 'OVER IP'?) allows to boot into BIOS of a remote machine a

Re: Clamav-90_2 Lockup with freebsd 6.2

On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 03:43:26PM +0200, Alexander Shikoff wrote: > Hi All, > > On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 08:32:55AM -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, Martin Blapp wrote: > > > > > > > >Hi, > > > > > >Clamd is currently broken with libpthread for some threading-reason. > > >You

Re: Boot prompt for Intel AMT

I hope some people will understand what i am talking about, because the technology, i think, is not very popular, but can come VERY handy. Intel AMT Serial over LAN (SOL, why is it called 'over LAN' if it is really 'OVER IP'?) allows to boot into BIOS of a remote machine and even, as seen in the

Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed

I used unixbenchmark for measure overall perfomance of three machines of different generations and with different OS versions. See for your self and compare results with machine cost. Hope this will be usefull for someone. BENCHMARKS: OMNI3 (current cost 2400$): Intel entry server mainboard, in