On 3/4/07, Mark Costlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The Machine:
I have a dual Xeon 5130 machine, Supermicro motherboard, with
the 82563EB NIC. From dmesg:
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU5130 @ 2.00GHz (2000.08-MHz 686-class CPU)
cpu0: on acpi0
em0: port 0x2000-0x201f
mem 0xda00-0
The Machine:
I have a dual Xeon 5130 machine, Supermicro motherboard, with
the 82563EB NIC. From dmesg:
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU5130 @ 2.00GHz (2000.08-MHz 686-class CPU)
cpu0: on acpi0
em0: port 0x2000-0x201f
mem 0xda00-0xda01 irq 18 at device 0.0 on pci4
The machine h
Is there any intent to backport that into -STABLE?
How ugly would that be to do?
--
--
Karl Denninger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Internet Consultant & Kids Rights Activist
http://www.denninger.netMy home on the net - links to everything I do!
http://scubaforum.org Your UNCENSORED plac
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 10:59:46AM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 04:03:30PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> > On Tuesday 27 February 2007 15:53, Alex Kozlov wrote:
> > = > Yes, I switched to swap-backed md already. But the malloc-based variety
> > is
> > = > currently the _de
This works! =D
Thank you very much! =)
frzburn
On 3/4/07, pluknet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 05/03/07, frzburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
> I'm unable to get my sound card working =(
>
> I first tried kldload snd_ich, since I have a ICH7 chip. But there was
no
> ``installed device''
On Monday 05 March 2007 11:36, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> I tried to reboot in another window but..
> eureka:~>reboot
> load: 0.06 cmd: csh 71159 [allproc] 0.03u 0.00s 0% 4652k
Interestingly this process did eventually finish. The system hasn't rebooted
yet but perhaps it will eventually.
--
Dan
On 05/03/07, frzburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi!
I'm unable to get my sound card working =(
I first tried kldload snd_ich, since I have a ICH7 chip. But there was no
``installed device'' in /dev/sndstat.
So I tried kldload snd_driver, as suggested by the handbook, and I didn't
get any result.
On Thursday 01 March 2007 17:35, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> > in /rescue and use './sysctl' (and other commands in rescue). I think
> > you will still be able to execute static executables in the current
> > directory vis a relative path even if the FS is deadlocked. (As long
> > as your shell isn'
Hi!
I'm unable to get my sound card working =(
I first tried kldload snd_ich, since I have a ICH7 chip. But there was no
``installed device'' in /dev/sndstat.
So I tried kldload snd_driver, as suggested by the handbook, and I didn't
get any result.
I also loaded sound.ko before loading snd_driver
Hi,
Make sure clamd is checking the return value of pthread_create()
for errors. You can also set LIBPTHREAD_PROCESS_SCOPE=yes or
LIBPTHREAD_SYSTEM_SCOPE=yes in your environment to force process
scope or system scope threads (libpthread only) for clamd.
Yes, it does check the return value. A
On Sun, 4 Mar 2007, Martin Blapp wrote:
Hi all,
After adding some debug stuff to clamd running with freebsd
libpthread.so I found that:
looking at the output value of 'ps -auxH | grep clamd | grep -v grep | wc -l'
is always staying at 6 threads, but the number of threadpool->thr_alive is
goin
Hi,
looking at the output value of 'ps -auxH | grep clamd | grep -v grep | wc -l'
is always staying at 6 threads, but the number of threadpool->thr_alive is
going higher and higher. So threadpool->thr_alive isn't decreased and
is completly incorrect.
After setting IdleTimeout very low to 5 se
frzburn wrote:
Well, again, thanks for all your replies! =)
After all you told me, I guess this guides describes the right tools to use
and the right way for rebuilding world.
http://www.bsdguides.org/guides/freebsd/beginners/update_freebsd.php
Thanks!
frzburn
On 3/4/07, Ronald Klop <[EMAIL
Hi all,
After adding some debug stuff to clamd running with freebsd
libpthread.so I found that:
looking at the output value of 'ps -auxH | grep clamd | grep -v grep | wc -l'
is always staying at 6 threads, but the number of threadpool->thr_alive is
going higher and higher. So threadpool->thr_al
Well, again, thanks for all your replies! =)
After all you told me, I guess this guides describes the right tools to use
and the right way for rebuilding world.
http://www.bsdguides.org/guides/freebsd/beginners/update_freebsd.php
Thanks!
frzburn
On 3/4/07, Ronald Klop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
On 01/03/07, Renato Botelho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 02:04:18PM -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, Alexander Shikoff wrote:
>
> >Hi All,
> >
> >On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 08:32:55AM -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> >>On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, Martin Blapp wrote:
> >
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> I don't know how critical this is, but I just thought about it ... this is my
> only system running gmirror ... everything seems fine according ot gmirror
> status, but maybe something iswron gthere I'm not seeing:
You should tell us, in which state those processes hung
On Sun, 04 Mar 2007 04:23:55 +0100, frzburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi everyone,
[cut some text]
So here come my questions:
Is portsnap syncing the sources correctly for rebuilding world, or must I
use cvsup?
If so, of what use is portsnap if I must use cvsup for synchronizing my
source?
Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
>
> On Mar 3, 2007, at 22:23 , frzburn wrote:
>
>> So here come my questions:
>> Is portsnap syncing the sources correctly for rebuilding world, or must I
>> use cvsup?
>> If so, of what use is portsnap if I must use cvsup for synchronizing my
>> source?
There's m
On Sunday 04 March 2007 06:02, Joe Holden wrote:
> frzburn wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> > I'm a new FreeBSD user, but a veteran Linux user ;)
> > I'm using FreeBSD 6, and I was wondering while I gave a try to rebuilding
> > ``world'' how to properly synchronize my source. Here's what I mean:
> >
Creat
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 10:59:46AM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 04:03:30PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> > On Tuesday 27 February 2007 15:53, Alex Kozlov wrote:
> > = > Yes, I switched to swap-backed md already. But the malloc-based variety
> > is
> > = > currently the _de
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 04:03:30PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 February 2007 15:53, Alex Kozlov wrote:
> = > Yes, I switched to swap-backed md already. But the malloc-based variety
> is
> = > currently the _default_ (see /etc/defaults/rc.conf)...
> = Bad default.
>
> Filing a P
22 matches
Mail list logo
