Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
> alright:
> cp /usr/obj/usr/src/libexec/bootpd/bootpd /tmp/
> strip /tmp/bootpd
>
> If that works, rm -rf /usr/obj and redo. See if memory is still exhausted
> after installworld, but do it in single user mode if you didn't.
I did a fresh cvsup and build, now installworld
Hi,
Scott Long wrote:
Peter Jeremy wrote:
I think FreeBSD Update shows the way forward but IMHO there needs to
be an "official" binary update tool accessible from www.freebsd.org.
FreeBSD Update was written by, and is continuously maintained by the
actual FreeBSD Security Officer. It's as
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 02:00:21PM -0800 I heard the voice of
Joe Rhett, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> Increasing the number of deployed systems out of date [...]
This doesn't make any sense. If you install a 6.0 system, in 6 months
(assuming you installed it right when 6.0 was cut, for simplicity)
On Sat, 2005-Dec-17 18:19:25 -0700, Scott Long wrote:
>Peter Jeremy wrote:
>>I think FreeBSD Update shows the way forward but IMHO there needs to
>>be an "official" binary update tool accessible from www.freebsd.org.
>
>FreeBSD Update was written by, and is continuously maintained by the
>actual Fr
Peter Jeremy wrote:
On Sat, 2005-Dec-17 23:35:34 +0100, Kövesdán Gábor wrote:
I agree. And after all, tracking a security branch isn't too difficult,
...
# cd /usr/src
# patch < /path/to/patch
# cd /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cvs/cvsbug
# make obj && make depend && make && make install
# cd /usr/s
HI all,
I am running FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE (of today) on a HP Pavillon (centrino based
notebook with i915 graphic chipset).
I am trying to use the latest drm hook for i915, but I get this error:
drmsub0: port 0x1800-0x1807 mem
0xb008-0xb00f,0xc000-0xcfff,0xb000-0xb003 irq 16
On Sunday 18 December 2005 01:13, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 18:14:01 +0100
> > From: martinko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > >>Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 14:29:39 -0600
> > >>From: Craig Boston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >>Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>
> > >>
> Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 18:14:01 +0100
> From: martinko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Kevin Oberman wrote:
> >>Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 14:29:39 -0600
> >>From: Craig Boston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >>>-cpu0: on acpi0
> >>>+cpu0: on acpi0
> >>>
> >>>Q: Guessing that
On Saturday 17 December 2005 22:55, Frank Steinborn wrote:
> > > ===> libexec/bootpd (install)
> > > install -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 bootpd /usr/libexec
> > > strip: /usr/libexec/bootpd: Memory exhausted
> Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
> > strip /usr/libexec/bootpd
>
> strip: '/usr/libexec/bootpd': No
> From: George Hartzell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 16:05:51 -0800
>
> Kevin Oberman writes:
> > [...]
> > No. There is no conflict between Cx states and EST. Cx states specifies
> > how deeply the CPU will sleep when idle. EST controls processor speed
> > and voltage. In most
Joe Rhett wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 12:04:05AM -0700, Scott Long wrote:
>>There will be three FreeBSD 6 releases in 2006.
>
> While this is nice, may I suggest that it is time to put aside/delay one
> release cycle and come up with a binary update mechanism supported well by
> the OS? Incr
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 02:00:21PM -0800, Joe Rhett wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 12:04:05AM -0700, Scott Long wrote:
> > There will be three FreeBSD 6 releases in 2006.
>
> While this is nice, may I suggest that it is time to put aside/delay one
> release cycle and come up with a binary update
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 10:23:05AM -0800, Bill Nicholls wrote:
> Let me add my voice to this discussion. I have been a happy user of
> FreeBSD from 4.0 thru 4.11, but have stumbled repeatedly on 5.x and now 6.0.
It looks like in the course of writing your long email you forgot to
describe any of
On Sat, 2005-Dec-17 23:35:34 +0100, Kövesdán Gábor wrote:
>I agree. And after all, tracking a security branch isn't too difficult,
...
># cd /usr/src
># patch < /path/to/patch
># cd /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cvs/cvsbug
># make obj && make depend && make && make install
># cd /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/send-p
Bill Nicholls wrote:
> Let me add my voice to this discussion. I have been a happy user of
> FreeBSD from 4.0 thru 4.11, but have stumbled repeatedly on 5.x and now
> 6.0.
>
> For some reason, I can get these (5 & 6) installed, but not stable or
> running KDE, yet 4.11 runs solid for months. In ad
Wilko Bulte wrote:
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 01:54:34PM -0800, Joe Rhett wrote..
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 12:04:05AM -0700, Scott Long wrote:
There will be three FreeBSD 6 releases in 2006.
While this is nice, may I suggest that it is time to put aside/delay one
release cycle and
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 01:54:34PM -0800, Joe Rhett wrote..
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 12:04:05AM -0700, Scott Long wrote:
> > There will be three FreeBSD 6 releases in 2006.
>
> While this is nice, may I suggest that it is time to put aside/delay one
> release cycle and come up with a binary updat
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 12:04:05AM -0700, Scott Long wrote:
> There will be three FreeBSD 6 releases in 2006.
While this is nice, may I suggest that it is time to put aside/delay one
release cycle and come up with a binary update mechanism supported well by
the OS? Increasing the speed of release
Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
> strip /usr/libexec/bootpd
strip: '/usr/libexec/bootpd': No such file
Frank
pgpf7adnFkflX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 12:04:05AM -0700, Scott Long wrote:
> There will be three FreeBSD 6 releases in 2006.
While this is nice, may I suggest that it is time to put aside/delay one
release cycle and come up with a binary update mechanism supported well by
the OS? Increasing the speed of release
Hi, Peter,
On 12/17/05, Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-Dec-17 04:06:36 +0800, Xin LI wrote:
> >No, it's sometimes other, and is quite infrequent. On the other hand,
> >neither SMART nor error has reported some incident, so I was stuck
> >when looking on hardware issues, as
On Saturday 17 December 2005 21:34, Frank Steinborn wrote:
> Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
> > Can you strip bootpd after install?
>
> If you mean whether I can run "strip bootpd":
>
> kellerkind:/usr/src# strip bootpd
> strip: 'bootpd': No such file
>
> I'm clueless at the moment.
strip /usr/libexec/boot
Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
> Can you strip bootpd after install?
If you mean whether I can run "strip bootpd":
kellerkind:/usr/src# strip bootpd
strip: 'bootpd': No such file
I'm clueless at the moment.
Frank
pgpcUoL9vzNB1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Let me add my voice to this discussion. I have been a happy user of
FreeBSD from 4.0 thru 4.11, but have stumbled repeatedly on 5.x and now 6.0.
For some reason, I can get these (5 & 6) installed, but not stable or
running KDE, yet 4.11 runs solid for months. In addition, not being able
to run
Kevin Oberman wrote:
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 14:29:39 -0600
From: Craig Boston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-cpu0: on acpi0
+cpu0: on acpi0
Q: Guessing that's a formatting difference, rather then 6.x not recognizing
the states (sysctl hw.acpi.cpu.cx_supported confirms 4 sta
On Saturday 17 December 2005 17:37, Frank Steinborn wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > strip: /usr/libexec/bootpd: Memory exhausted
> >
> > Well, is it?
>
> I don't think so, i have nothing in logs that something is going to be
> killed and i still have space in swap.
Can you strip bootpd after i
Chuck Swiger wrote:
> While brevity is a paramount virtue in writing-- and about that topic, I
> cannot
> say too much [1]-- however, Frank, you might want to consider the output of
> "swapinfo" and "top -o size".
>
> Perhaps you don't have enough swap configured, or none at all?
Okay, i had a l
Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 04:58:01PM +0100, Frank Steinborn wrote:
>> i'm trying to update to -STABLE from today from a 6.0-RELEASE and make
>> installworld fails here:
[ ... ]
>>===> libexec/bootpd (install)
>> install -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 bootpd /usr/libexec
>> strip:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > strip: /usr/libexec/bootpd: Memory exhausted
>
> Well, is it?
I don't think so, i have nothing in logs that something is going to be
killed and i still have space in swap.
Frank
pgpUTrqqOOK9e.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 04:58:01PM +0100, Frank Steinborn wrote:
> Hello,
>
> i'm trying to update to -STABLE from today from a 6.0-RELEASE and make
> installworld fails here:
>
> /usr/share/man/man3/lwres_getaddrsbyname.3.gz ->
> /usr/share/man/man3/lwres_resutil.3.gz
> /usr/share/man/man3/lwre
Hello,
i'm trying to update to -STABLE from today from a 6.0-RELEASE and make
installworld fails here:
/usr/share/man/man3/lwres_getaddrsbyname.3.gz ->
/usr/share/man/man3/lwres_resutil.3.gz
/usr/share/man/man3/lwres_getnamebyaddr.3.gz ->
/usr/share/man/man3/lwres_resutil.3.gz
/usr/share/man/man
Security updates will be maintained for quite a while. However, it
takes manpower to test each proposed security change, so it's very hard
to justify doing them 'indefinitely'. The stated policy from the
security team is 2 years. So they will probably support 5.5 into
2008, but I wanted to be
Melvyn Sopacua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Features=0xa7e9f9bf LUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,TM,PBE>
> + Features2=0x180
>
> Q: What are those extra features
Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitor 2.
> and are they useful? ;-)
Yes. The kernel's cpufreq framework will use them.
> -ACPI
33 matches
Mail list logo
