Voodoo with md(4) panics system reliably

2005-10-16 Thread Jon Passki
Hello, I'm attempting to simulate unionfs on RELENG_5_4 by remounting multiple times one vnode-backed md disk and then union mounting others on top. Here are my steps below w/ a quick backtrace. I have the core saved and can look into it farther if need be. Ideas outside of ``don't do that''?

Re: Disk 100% busy

2005-10-16 Thread Brad Knowles
At 9:16 AM -0400 2005-10-16, Will Saxon wrote: In this case, my mail gateway is is a dual 3.06GHz Xeon with 1GB of ram and 2 36GB 15krpm drives in a raid-1 on a smart array 6i (cciss) controller. I am running FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p1. Systat -vmstat reports the disk mirror is 100% busy at all

Re: Disk 100% busy

2005-10-16 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Oct 16), Will Saxon said: > I am trying to diagnose a problem whereby a virus scanner (clam > antivirus) is taking too long to scan attachments on a mail server. > We have an attachment limitation of 20MB and an attachment of 7-20MB > can take over 3 minutes to scan. This often

Could NOT get X to work at IBM thinkpad i series 1300

2005-10-16 Thread Wei Hu
I followed the instruction but i can not start X, the screen is black and the laptop does not respond user, only a reboot through ssh can save it. I installed Freebsd at my Dell laptop and it works well, and I installed Debian linux at the same IBM thinkpad, it works well. but just can not get fre

Re: 6.0 release date and stability

2005-10-16 Thread Michael Nottebrock
On Sunday, 16. October 2005 18:34, Ronald Klop wrote: > There are a couple of options: > 1. Do not remove old (5.4) libraries. All 5.4 libs wil still be found. > 2. Remove old libraries and install ports/misc/compat5x. All 5.4 lib wil > still be found. > 3. Remove old libraries and use /etc/libmap

Re: linking problems with heimdal in base (ports version works)

2005-10-16 Thread Igor Pokrovsky
On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 06:35:51PM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > On Sunday, 16. October 2005 09:06, Igor Pokrovsky wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 09:49:51PM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > > > On Friday, 14. October 2005 21:11, Igor Pokrovsky wrote: > > > > > Still, isn't it strange tha

Re: Disk 100% busy

2005-10-16 Thread Ronald Klop
On Sun, 16 Oct 2005 15:16:34 +0200, Will Saxon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I am trying to diagnose a problem whereby a virus scanner (clam antivirus) is taking too long to scan attachments on a mail server. We have an attachment limitation of 20MB and an attachment of 7-20MB can take over 3 min

Re: linking problems with heimdal in base (ports version works)

2005-10-16 Thread Michael Nottebrock
On Sunday, 16. October 2005 09:06, Igor Pokrovsky wrote: > On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 09:49:51PM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > > On Friday, 14. October 2005 21:11, Igor Pokrovsky wrote: > > > > Still, isn't it strange that the kerberos libs don't have any > > > > dependencies registered? A quick

Re: 6.0 release date and stability

2005-10-16 Thread Ronald Klop
On Sun, 16 Oct 2005 13:57:52 +0200, dick hoogendijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 23:03:53 -0400 "Joshua Coombs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: For what it's worth, on UP, my 386 (stop laughing) is showing twice the inbound and outbound tcp throughput across multiple apps compared

Re: linking problems with heimdal in base (ports version works)

2005-10-16 Thread Igor Pokrovsky
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 09:49:51PM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > On Friday, 14. October 2005 21:11, Igor Pokrovsky wrote: > > > > Still, isn't it strange that the kerberos libs don't have any > > > dependencies registered? A quick check shows that they are almost the > > > only libs in /usr/l

Disk 100% busy

2005-10-16 Thread Will Saxon
I am trying to diagnose a problem whereby a virus scanner (clam antivirus) is taking too long to scan attachments on a mail server. We have an attachment limitation of 20MB and an attachment of 7-20MB can take over 3 minutes to scan. This often causes the sending mail server to timeout and resend t

Re: 6.0 release date and stability

2005-10-16 Thread P.U.Kruppa
On Sun, 16 Oct 2005, dick hoogendijk wrote: On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 23:03:53 -0400 "Joshua Coombs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: For what it's worth, on UP, my 386 (stop laughing) is showing twice the inbound and outbound tcp throughput across multiple apps compared to 4.11. Disk throughput is sligh

Re: 6.0 release date and stability

2005-10-16 Thread dick hoogendijk
On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 23:03:53 -0400 "Joshua Coombs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For what it's worth, on UP, my 386 (stop laughing) is showing twice > the inbound and outbound tcp throughput across multiple apps compared > to 4.11. Disk throughput is slightly higher, but nothing super > impres

Re: cpu frequency on 6.0

2005-10-16 Thread Markus Trippelsdorf
On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 06:54:12AM +0200, Zoran Kolic wrote: > I'd like to know, prior to > install upcoming 6.0, about > putting cpu into cooler mo- > de. On 5.4 and amd64 2800+ cpu > (754, 0.13) with "acpi_ppc", > it works fine and temperature > is just over 30. Could I do the > same with "device

Re: 6.0 release date and stability

2005-10-16 Thread Jayton Garnett
Brett Glass wrote: At 06:34 PM 10/15/2005, David Syphers wrote: http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.0R/todo.html Linked to from the schedule page... Been there. Want to get folks' opinions, and also more detail than is likely to appear on th epage. Good to see alot of it just need