On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 06:35:51PM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > On Sunday, 16. October 2005 09:06, Igor Pokrovsky wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 09:49:51PM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > > > On Friday, 14. October 2005 21:11, Igor Pokrovsky wrote: > > > > > Still, isn't it strange that the kerberos libs don't have any > > > > > dependencies registered? A quick check shows that they are almost the > > > > > only libs in /usr/lib that have zero output from ldd. > > > > > > > > Probably they are statically linked. > > > > > > No, static libraries don't come with an .so extension. :-) > > > > No, you missed my point. I mean that kerberos libs are dynamic but > > linked against other libraries statically. > > If they were, there would be no problem in the first place.
Sorry, it seems I missed a part of the thread. -ip -- The love letter you finally got the courage to send will be delayed in the mail long enough for you to make a fool of yourself in person. _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
