Hello,
I am afraid the nvidia on-board raid controller is not supported. Take a
look at hardware notes:
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.4R/hardware-i386.html
You will have to use either supported raid controller or use software
raid:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=vinum&sektion=8
h
I have a DFI Lanparty nf4 Ultra-D with two 80GB drives configured as a raid1
array. The bios lists the array as scsi-0 and claims that its healthy. When I
boot from the disc1 cd and try to do the usual install the only device options
I'm given for fdisk are ad4 and ad6, which obviously aren't a
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 04:29:02PM -0700, Vinod Kashyap wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Linux, it applies to FreeBSD as well. You have to use '-d 3ware,N'
> > > with every command, where N is the unit #.
> > > Ex: smartctl -H -A -d 3ware,1 /dev/twed
> >
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Karl Denninger
> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 4:25 PM
> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: ad10: WARNING - READ_DMA UDMA ICRC error
> (retryingrequest)LBA=11441599
>
> On Thu, Aug 11, 20
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 03:44:52PM -0700, Vinod Kashyap wrote:
> > I have two controllers here that are from different
> > manufacturers and both exhibit the same problem. The SAME
> > disks (two different manufacturers - hitachi and maxtor) on a
> > motherboard ICH5 adapter work perfectly, sma
> I have two controllers here that are from different
> manufacturers and both exhibit the same problem. The SAME
> disks (two different manufacturers - hitachi and maxtor) on a
> motherboard ICH5 adapter work perfectly, smartmontools says
> all 4 (I have two examples of each) are healthy, and
7.0-CURRENT blows up just as reliably, and in exactly the same way (with
"DANGER WILL ROBINSON" complaints) as 6.0-BETA2 does here on my sandbox
machine.
The only addition is that 7.0 panics into the debugger some of the time as
well. and, like 6.0-BETA2 when it does blow up you can't reboot f
Hi,
> On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 19:28:40 +1000
> Mark Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Mark_Andrews> I can't see how that can have any effect as the shift
Mark_Andrews> is only 0..15 (0xf).
Mark_Andrews> filter[h >> 4] |= 1 << (h & 0xF);
Yup, you are right. I focused attention
Mark Sergeant wrote:
Output from pciconf -lv
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:7:2 class=0x0c0320 card=0x12340925 chip=0x31041106
rev=0x51 hdr=0x00
vendor= 'VIA Technologies Inc'
device= 'VT6202 USB 2.0 Enhanced Host Controller'
class= serial bus
subclass= USB
The same card
Krzysztof Kowalik wrote:
And 6.0-BETA2 works fine. Did someone forget to merge some fixes for mpt
from RELENG_5 to RELENG_5_4? [...]
It might be a candidate for an errata notice. Those fixes won't go
without saying into a previously released branch.
Björn
___
Krzysztof Kowalik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
> > And 5-STABLE (installed snapshot from the end of January and upgraded to
> > a recent -STABLE) works fine. I love to answer to myself.
> And, despite my hopes, 5.4-RELEASE/amd64 does not work again. I think
> I'm getting unlucky recently.
And 6
> Could you try this patch? Since I don't have SMC 83c170 card, I
> cannot test it by myself.
>
> Index: sys/dev/tx/if_tx.c
> diff -u -p sys/dev/tx/if_tx.c.orig sys/dev/tx/if_tx.c
> --- sys/dev/tx/if_tx.c.orig Tue Oct 29 10:43:49 2002
> +++ sys/dev/tx/if_tx.cThu Aug 11 17:47:45 2005
>
Hi,
> On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 10:55:23 +1000
> Mark Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Mark_Andrews> I have a problem in that the router solicitations are not
Mark_Andrews> being received by my FreeBSD IPv6 router unless I enable
Mark_Andrews> promiscuous mode on the tx0 interface. This
Mark Sergeant wrote:
Output from pciconf -lv
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:7:2 class=0x0c0320 card=0x12340925 chip=0x31041106 rev=0x51
hdr=0x00
vendor= 'VIA Technologies Inc'
device= 'VT6202 USB 2.0 Enhanced Host Controller'
class= serial bus
subclass= USB
The same card
Krzysztof Kowalik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > I'm trying, without success, to install the FreeBSD 5.3 on a Sun Fire
> > > V40z (it's an amd64 box) on its LSILogic 1030 Ultra4 SCSI controller.
> > Interesting. 5.3-RELEASE for x86 works on the same machine, same disks
> > connected to the same c
15 matches
Mail list logo