I got an io error
"xf86EnableIO: Fatal to open /dev/io for extended I/O"
when running "Xorg -configure".
Has this snapshot been fixed this problem?
Eitarou
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-s
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The following is the result when use SATA 200GB disk on pc98. It is
> > clearly that recognizing a geometry fails.
> >
> > atapci0: port
> > 0xc000-0xc00f,0x602c-0x602f,0x6030-0x6037,0x6028-0x602b,0x6020-0x6027 mem
> >
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 08:29:13AM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote:
> >The snapshots on snapshots.[jp|se].freebsd.org are date-suffixed (however,
> >those servers don't build snaps for all platforms).
> >
>
> I'm talking hour/min./second, thanks.
Both checkout code as of 00:00:00 GMT on the date the sn
> I was just wondering whether it is posibl to build say a 4.11 kernel
> on a 5.3 system - I'd like to have only one machine here on which I
> maintain all the sources and buidl what i need, then I think you can
> mount the /usr/obj file system and /usr/src and run the install stages
> on other sys
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 11:46:07 -1000, Randy Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > AFAIK, one of the main points of that logo competition is
> > to do away with anything that could be interpreted in an
> > religious way.
>
> this is sick. should it happen, i'll take up the penguin.
Wow, if that's you
Scot Hetzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 23:58:03 +0300, Artem Kuchin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi!
I have a table with ethernet (MAC) addresses matching IPs. It is
used to build dhcp config file. But regardless of that any user can
assign his neighbour ips while that pc is turn
Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
Sorry to butt in on your thread, but it seems relevant. I am having
problems with gvinum under 5-STABLE and a RAID 0 array of two disks.
The array works perfectly until reboot. Then, when the machine comes
back up the plexes are marked as stale. Issuing these commands f
> AFAIK, one of the main points of that logo competition is
> to do away with anything that could be interpreted in an
> religious way.
this is sick. should it happen, i'll take up the penguin.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.f
Sorry to butt in on your thread, but it seems relevant. I am having
problems with gvinum under 5-STABLE and a RAID 0 array of two disks.
The array works perfectly until reboot. Then, when the machine comes
back up the plexes are marked as stale. Issuing these commands fixes
the problem until th
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 09:28:33PM +, Alex Burke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was just wondering whether it is posibl to build say a 4.11 kernel
> on a 5.3 system - I'd like to have only one machine here on which I
> maintain all the sources and buidl what i need, then I think you can
> mount the /usr/o
Hi,
I was just wondering whether it is posibl to build say a 4.11 kernel
on a 5.3 system - I'd like to have only one machine here on which I
maintain all the sources and buidl what i need, then I think you can
mount the /usr/obj file system and /usr/src and run the install stages
on other systems.
Steve Hodgson wrote:
On Tuesday 15 February 2005 14:02, Tuure Laurinolli wrote:
Steve Hodgson wrote:
On Sunday 16 January 2005 17:37, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 02:22:05PM +, Steve Hodgson wrote:
I'm getting the following error on a RELENG_5_3 box when trying to
compile the RE
On Tuesday 15 February 2005 14:02, Tuure Laurinolli wrote:
> Steve Hodgson wrote:
> > On Sunday 16 January 2005 17:37, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >>On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 02:22:05PM +, Steve Hodgson wrote:
> >>>I'm getting the following error on a RELENG_5_3 box when trying to
> >>>compile the REL
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 23:58:03 +0300, Artem Kuchin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have a table with ethernet (MAC) addresses matching IPs. It is
> used to build dhcp config file. But regardless of that any user can
> assign his neighbour ips while that pc is turned off and use it to
> access
From: Takahashi Yoshihiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: UPDATE: ATA mkIII first official patches - please test!
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 21:08:05 +0900 (JST)
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Søren Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > >>>2. A geometry translation for pc98 is NOT enough.
>
> > I'm talking hour/min./second, thanks.
> >
> What it sounds like you really want is the CVS revision ID for every
> file in the snapshot so that when someone reports a bug that you think
> you might have fixed already, you can just point them to the correct
> revision. Haven't you learned that
I concur that the situation got much better with 5.3-Stable. What I
experienced afterward occurred only under load.
-Jonathan
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, Alan Jay wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 04:53:24PM -, Alan Jay wrote:
> > > I had major problems installing w
Steve Hodgson wrote:
On Sunday 16 January 2005 17:37, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 02:22:05PM +, Steve Hodgson wrote:
I'm getting the following error on a RELENG_5_3 box when trying to
compile the RELENG_5 sources. I've been cvsupping now for about a week
and continuing to get t
Hello,
This is a 5.3-RELEASE-p5/amd64 on IBM X236 (EM64T) with 2GB RAM
and a LSI 21320 rmpt(4) running at 160MB/s with a hardware
RAID (da0, da1). HTT is enabled. When I run benchmark/blogbench on
/da0/ I can *reproduce* this panic again and again:
(I'm getting a dump now, let me fsck first)
kerne
I'm having some problem with interface bonding on 5.3 stable.
I used this before on 4.x without problems. I can't run 5.3-R
becuase my SysKonnect nics panic the box when i load the drivers. (5.3-Stable
fixed this).
First off this is how i'm bonding nics.
kldload ng_ether
# create ngeth0 a
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 04:11:31PM +, John wrote:
> Another data point - I see this in my nightly security logs:
>
> swap_pager: indefinite wait buffer: device: ad0s1f, blkno: 28190, size: 4096
>
> maybe there's a bad block on the swap partition??
That's what this usually means, yes.
Kris
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, Tristan wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:08:26 +1030
> Tristan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > can anyone confirm what the preferred tool is
> > in 5.3-STABLE, vinum or gvinum ? Is gvinum
> > ready for production use in a RAID5 config ?
>
> Does this limitation still exist
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 04:18:47PM -0600, Chris Dillon wrote:
> >(i did not undestrand, how i somebody can match mac and ip with
> >static arp except that he actually get the physical NIC from
> >somebody's computer).
>
> Because you can change the MAC address of your NIC to match someone
> els
> -Original Message-
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 04:53:24PM -, Alan Jay wrote:
> > I had major problems installing with more than 4Gb but once I moved to
> stable
> > we seemed to have a stable platform when doing basic stuff - we have two
> > databases (mySQL) one is reasonably heavily u
[ PLEASE don't top post - it losses context, and this is a Unix mailing list]
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 04:53:24PM -, Alan Jay wrote:
> I had major problems installing with more than 4Gb but once I moved to stable
> we seemed to have a stable platform when doing basic stuff - we have two
> datab
>
> The >4GB problems with 5.3-RELEASE are a well known problem and affect
> for i386 and amd64. It's pretty much fixed in the 5.3-STABLE stream,
> but there are a few edge cases that I still need to fix which prevent me
> from feeling good about turning it into a 5.3-R errata fix. It'll
> defin
Alan Jay wrote:
Thanks Jonathan for this, can I ask the unmentionalble (which Linux
implementation did you pick?).
I had major problems installing with more than 4Gb but once I moved to stable
we seemed to have a stable platform when doing basic stuff - we have two
databases (mySQL) one is reasonab
Thanks Jonathan for this, can I ask the unmentionalble (which Linux
implementation did you pick?).
I had major problems installing with more than 4Gb but once I moved to stable
we seemed to have a stable platform when doing basic stuff - we have two
databases (mySQL) one is reasonably heavily used
Michael Nottebrock wrote:
On Tuesday, 15. February 2005 17:41, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
On Tuesday, 15. February 2005 17:29, Nate Lawson wrote:
Michael Nottebrock wrote:
On Tuesday, 15. February 2005 07:28, Nate Lawson wrote:
Are there any tags for these? That may be too heavyweight but at least
On Tuesday, 15. February 2005 17:41, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> On Tuesday, 15. February 2005 17:29, Nate Lawson wrote:
> > Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, 15. February 2005 07:28, Nate Lawson wrote:
> > >>Are there any tags for these? That may be too heavyweight but at least
> > >>pu
Thanks for this - the oddity is we have two identical machines and on one the
problem occurred we then moved the application over to the other machines that
had been working fine and it then exhibited the same symptoms - hence the
query about the broadcom controller. I am hoping to so some further
On Tuesday, 15. February 2005 17:29, Nate Lawson wrote:
> Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 15. February 2005 07:28, Nate Lawson wrote:
> >>Are there any tags for these? That may be too heavyweight but at least
> >>publishing the exact UTC date for the build would be good. That would
> >>
Nate Lawson wrote:
Michael Nottebrock wrote:
On Tuesday, 15. February 2005 07:28, Nate Lawson wrote:
Are there any tags for these? That may be too heavyweight but at least
publishing the exact UTC date for the build would be good. That would
help us track down in bug reports what code the user h
John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for your input so far. Here is the output from top:
>
> last pid: 59737; load averages: 0.02, 0.03, 0.00up 1+18:32:57
> 15:16:36
> 82 processes: 1 running, 79 sleeping, 2 zombie
> CPU states: 0.4% user, 0.0% nice, 0.4% system, 0.0% inte
Michael Nottebrock wrote:
On Tuesday, 15. February 2005 07:28, Nate Lawson wrote:
Are there any tags for these? That may be too heavyweight but at least
publishing the exact UTC date for the build would be good. That would
help us track down in bug reports what code the user has, especially
when
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 22:35:55 -0600, Dan Nelson wrote
> In the last episode (Feb 14), Kris Kennaway said:
> > On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 01:30:42AM +, John wrote:
> > > Is there a way of seeing *what* program/process is eating swap.
> > > There are loads of ways of seeing that it is being eaten, bu
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 22:35:55 -0600, Dan Nelson wrote
> In the last episode (Feb 14), Kris Kennaway said:
> > On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 01:30:42AM +, John wrote:
> > > Is there a way of seeing *what* program/process is eating swap.
> > > There are loads of ways of seeing that it is being eaten, bu
Hello,
This is a 5.3-RELEASE-p5/amd64 on IBM X236 (EM64T) with 2GB RAM
and a LSI 21320 rmpt(4) running at 160MB/s with a hardware
RAID (da0, da1). HTT is enabled. When I run benchmark/blogbench on
/da0/ I can *reproduce* this panic again and again:
(I'm getting a dump now, let me fsck first)
kerne
On Tuesday, 15. February 2005 07:28, Nate Lawson wrote:
> Are there any tags for these? That may be too heavyweight but at least
> publishing the exact UTC date for the build would be good. That would
> help us track down in bug reports what code the user has, especially
> when it's from areas t
Artem Kuchin wrote:
Hi!
I have a table with ethernet (MAC) addresses matching IPs. It is
used to build dhcp config file. But regardless of that any user can
assign his neighbour ips while that pc is turned off and use it to
access internet. The local ips are 192.168. and are behind natd.
I am runni
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Søren Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>>2. A geometry translation for pc98 is NOT enough.
> >>>
> >>> Currently, it works only under 4.3GB disk.
>
> Wrong, ATA mk3 does solve the problem but using the "current" geomtry
> set in the drives by the BIOS. Howe
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 05:47:27PM -0800, Jonathan A. Dama wrote:
> FreeBSD/amd64 is not in my opinion not actually a stable tier 1 quality
> release under these configurations, too many problems remain--especially
> in regards to ia32 emulation.
It is not required for a Tier-1 platform to have 32
Rob wrote:
In this case there's only one harddisk and when I do
# atacontrol mode 0 UDMA66 BIOSPIO
I get lots of such lines:
ad0: WARNING - WRITE_DMA UDMA ICRC error (retrying
request) LBA=20185375
ad0: WARNING - WRITE_DMA UDMA ICRC error (retrying
request) LBA=20185375
ad0: FAILURE - WRITE_DMA
43 matches
Mail list logo
