On Sat, 6 Nov 2004, Don Lewis wrote:
Yes. The behaviour should be exactly the same as before. The only
difference is that phase 4 should run a lot faster if there are a lot of
UNREF files and directories.
'k, everything seemed to run faster except the first two, but the uptime
was only 5 days on
On 7 Nov, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Nov 2004, Don Lewis wrote:
>
>> On 6 Nov, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>>>
>>> Well, finally had a reason to use it, and its running right now ... seems
>>> a bit slower in phase 2 then before ... is to be expected? Looking
>>> through the patch, it seem
I did a gvinum start.
On Sat, 2004-11-06 at 04:16, Matthias Schuendehuette wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 3. November 2004 21:27 schrieb secmgr:
> > Just ran into this myself. I had a perfectly happy raid 5 plex under
> > 5.3 RC1. I upgrade to RC2, and the whole plex goes stale. I deleted
> > everything
No, I mean self corrupting raid5 sets during initialization. Discussed
about 2-3 weeks ago.
On Sat, 2004-11-06 at 05:09, Matthias Schuendehuette wrote:
>
> If you mean the 'dangling vnode'-problem with "vinum-classic":
>
> Try to start 'classic' vinum *after* the system has come up. Either
> m
hi,
im trying to get some use of the linux emulation :), ive got a debian box
just for iptables tryouts (thats a waste of a machine:). i guess the best
choice is to get it to work in my fbsd5 and play there, but,
linux_base-debian y marked a broken some time now, should i expect it
working soon?, i
At 1:02 AM -0400 11/7/04, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
I hate to report an email, but after being laughed at by both
Linux and Windows users, I'm kinda concerned at the lack of
response to my originals ... is this truly the desired behaviour?
And, if so ... can someone put some sort of warning/notice ab
I hate to report an email, but after being laughed at by both Linux and
Windows users, I'm kinda concerne at the lack of response to my originals
... is this truly the desired behaviour? And, if so ... can someone put
some sort of warning/notice about it in the man page(s)?
==
I just made
On Sat, 6 Nov 2004, Don Lewis wrote:
On 6 Nov, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Well, finally had a reason to use it, and its running right now ... seems
a bit slower in phase 2 then before ... is to be expected? Looking
through the patch, it seems that all pass's were affected, so this might
be now the n
On 6 Nov, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> Well, finally had a reason to use it, and its running right now ... seems
> a bit slower in phase 2 then before ... is to be expected? Looking
> through the patch, it seems that all pass's were affected, so this might
> be now the norm ... after ~39minute
On Monday, 1 November 2004 at 10:05:16 +1100, Carl Makin wrote:
> Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>
>> On Monday, 25 October 2004 at 14:21:33 -0600, secmgr wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> It's beginning to look like that's a bad idea. Lukas is
>> (understandably) working only on gvinum, and since I know it's nearl
It is my great pleasure and privilege to announce the availability of
FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE. This release marks a milestone in the FreeBSD 5.x
series and the beginning of the 5-STABLE branch of releases. Some of
the many changes since 5.2.1 include:
- A binary compatibility interface has been intr
Hi,
I would like to make my problems clear.
I have two questions about bridge function in the following figure.
(1) Can we use bridge function over psuedo devices such as
gif and tun?
box3# ifconfig bge0 inet 133.149.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.0
box2# ifconfig create gif0
box2# gifconfig gi
Well, finally had a reason to use it, and its running right now ... seems
a bit slower in phase 2 then before ... is to be expected? Looking
through the patch, it seems that all pass's were affected, so this might
be now the norm ... after ~39minutes running on a very large file system,
hittin
On Sat, 2004-11-06 at 19:36, Peter Radcliffe wrote:
> "S. Anthony Sequeira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> probably said:
> > Can anyone tell me which groups 12 and 14 are, on a 4.10 system please.
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/etc/group?rev=1.19.2.3&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup
>
> > $
On Sat, 2004-11-06 at 13:40, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 06, 2004 at 07:15:45PM +, S. Anthony Sequeira wrote:
> > Can anyone tell me which groups 12 and 14 are, on a 4.10 system please.
> >
> > I keep getting this from 340.noid
> >
> > Check for files with an unknown user or group:
>
Sebastian Böck wrote:
Have you considered that 7.2 is the last Version that doesn't have
schemas. Out there may be some / are lot of applications that depend
on this behaviour.
I've considered lots of things.
Nothing is *forcing* you to upgrade, and there will be packages for this
port all the way
On Sat, Nov 06, 2004 at 07:15:45PM +, S. Anthony Sequeira wrote:
> Can anyone tell me which groups 12 and 14 are, on a 4.10 system please.
>
> I keep getting this from 340.noid
>
> Check for files with an unknown user or group:
> /usr/compat/linux/var/lock
> /usr/compat/linux/var/spool/ma
"S. Anthony Sequeira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> probably said:
> Can anyone tell me which groups 12 and 14 are, on a 4.10 system please.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/etc/group?rev=1.19.2.3&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup
> $ ls -ld /usr/compat/linux/var/lock /usr/compat/linux/var/spool/m
Can anyone tell me which groups 12 and 14 are, on a 4.10 system please.
I keep getting this from 340.noid
Check for files with an unknown user or group:
/usr/compat/linux/var/lock
/usr/compat/linux/var/spool/mail
$ ls -ld /usr/compat/linux/var/lock /usr/compat/linux/var/spool/mail
drwxrwxr-x
Could be many reasons, e.g.:
You didn't do a mergemaster while upgrading the base system,
or you upgrade from 4.x to 5.x, which no longer has /etc/defaults/make.conf
...
But either case, looking at /usr/src/UPDATING and /usr/ports/UPDATING
is a good idea.
On Fri, 5 Nov 2004 19:37:14 +0100, Mi
On Sat, 6 Nov 2004, [ISO-8859-1] Sebastian B?ck wrote:
SB> Ade Lovett wrote:
SB> > FYI. Prior to the postgresql new-world-order in ports/, I have now tagged
SB> > databases/postgresql72 (current version 7.2.5) as DEPRECATED, with it
SB> > being removed from the tree on or about 1st January 2005.
Hi all!
Don't wonna make stupid
quiestions, but this is
something I have to know
to make reclamation if neces-
sary.
After 5-10 minutes of inter-
net connection, when detached,
my pccard modem is hot as fur-
nace. I can barely take it in
my hand. Is it normal beha-
veour?
Model is Zoltrix, has "cir
Am Mittwoch, 3. November 2004 21:27 schrieb secmgr:
> I hate to sound like a whiney baby, but WTF
> is going on? It feels like vinum from 4.x has basicly been abandoned
> (short of crashes with no workaround), and gvinum ain't near ready
> for primetime.
If you mean the 'dangling vnode'-problem w
Am Mittwoch, 3. November 2004 21:27 schrieb secmgr:
> Just ran into this myself. I had a perfectly happy raid 5 plex under
> 5.3 RC1. I upgrade to RC2, and the whole plex goes stale. I deleted
> everything from the volume on down (except for the drives), and tried
> to recreate the vol/plex/sd's
Ade Lovett wrote:
FYI. Prior to the postgresql new-world-order in ports/, I have now
tagged databases/postgresql72 (current version 7.2.5) as DEPRECATED,
with it being removed from the tree on or about 1st January 2005.
You are *strongly* urged to upgrade to either 7.3.x or 7.4.x
Have you consi
25 matches
Mail list logo
