On Fri, 13 Aug 2004, Tod McQuillin wrote:
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
I have a tech going down to reboot the machine, since I can't leave it down
long ... is there something else that I should have looked at on this?
Since there is no KVM/keyboard attached to this, and it wasn't
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
I have a tech going down to reboot the machine, since I can't leave it down
long ... is there something else that I should have looked at on this? Since
there is no KVM/keyboard attached to this, and it wasn't booted with one in
it, I don't have any
I have a server that is a wee bit on the loaded side right now, but still
functional ... there are currently 84 jail'd environments running on her
...
Its a Dual Xeon, 4G of RAM, and 6x72G drives in a RAID5 configuration ...
kernel/world is built as:
CFLAGS= -O -mpentium -pipe -g -DKVA_PAGES=512
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Yesterday I upgraded my news server from 5.1 to 5.2.1 and ran into
> performance problem.
> Want to say from the beginning that during upgrade I transferred all
> my sysctl and other settings from 5.1 into 5.2.1
You might get a better response from the folks on the freebs
On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 14:57:31 +0200, Ronald van der Pol wrote:
> Yep, I have the same problem with the latest 4.10: no ICMP6
> packet too big packets are sent.
Sorry, I made a mistake. I did not set net.inet6.ip6.forwarding=1
on the test machine. Now I have and now I get "packet too big"
icmp6
On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 14:01:56 +0200, Ronald van der Pol wrote:
> So, maybe something changed getween July 17th and now. I will
> see what happens after an upgrade to the latest 4.10.
Yep, I have the same problem with the latest 4.10: no ICMP6
packet too big packets are sent.
rvdp
Hi all,
My wife has a Tungsten E we are trying to connect to a 4.10 workstation. I
rebuilt the kernel with the needed devices, and added an entry to usbd.conf.
But when I hit 'hotsync' on the palm, it timed out. Obviously there is a
lot that could have gone wrong. But is there a step-by-step a
On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 12:02:17 +1000, Mark Andrews wrote:
> Is this a known issue?
> Do you need more information?
I have tried it on
4.10-STABLE FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE #8: Sat Jul 17 10:08:52 CEST 2004
It sends "Packet too big" icmp6s on the wire. I also see the
netstat -s -p icmp6 "
On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 12:02:17 +1000, Mark Andrews wrote:
> The box does not appear to be generating a ICMP6 too big error
> message which I would expect to see once the 1428 octet TCP
> segments start arriving.
You could also check the output of:
netstat -s -p icmp6
There ha
Hi Marc,
I'm not subscribed to -net list, so in case you haven't got solution yet,
here is some info.
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 05:37:28PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> I have 5 servers sitting on a Linksys 10/100 switch ... 4 of the 5 are
> running fxp0 ethernet, while the 5th is running em .
10 matches
Mail list logo
