On Tue, 29 Jun 2004, Phillip Salzman wrote:
> I've been able to reproduce it nearly every time I try to vi -- on machines
> with HTT completely enabled also now too.
>
> Does anyone know of any tests that I could conduct which might help point a
> finger at the culprit? I'm pretty much at a loss
I've been able to reproduce it nearly every time I try to vi -- on machines
with HTT completely enabled also now too.
Does anyone know of any tests that I could conduct which might help point a
finger at the culprit? I'm pretty much at a loss of idea's...
Thanks,
Phillip Salzman
> -Origin
I'd like to install freebsd 4.10 on my computer and use it as a web and mail server. I
need a stable and reliable server so i chose 4.10 and not the 5.2.1release. Is there a
way to install the 4.10 release on a computer with SATA drive? I got a MSI K7N2 board
and the needed driver is Promise Fas
Click here to view our e-mail legal notice:
http://www.swistgroup.com/email.htm or call: +27 21 888 7920
Hi all,
I'm investigating atacontrol raid as an alternative to vinum.
Ivan wrote:
> i tried to install freebsd from a bootable cd. but the installer
> does not find my sata drive. the promise fastrak driver is not
> listed in the active on inactive drivers list. what can i do?
So I guess 378 is a newer ATA controller chip. It is not supported (yet?) by
FreeBSD 4.1
Ivan wrote:
> hi, i'd like to install freebsd 4.10 on my computer and use it like a web
> and mail server. my problem is that i need a promise fastrak sata 378 or
> compatible driver to be able to install freebsd on my sata drive. is there
> such a driver? i'm new to freebsd and unix. can anybody
hi, i'd like to install freebsd 4.10 on my computer and use it like a web and mail
server. my problem is that i need a promise fastrak sata 378 or compatible driver to
be able to install freebsd on my sata drive. is there such a driver? i'm new to
freebsd and unix. can anybody explain me how i c
On Tuesday 29 June 2004 00.37, David Magda wrote:
> On Jun 28, 2004, at 11:06, Matt Douhan wrote:
> > why ?
> >
> > they may not be public machines at all and be isolated to an
> > environment where
> > security is not the primary concern
>
> Have you not seen the SSH exploit in "The Matrix Reload"