been solid. Its possible that its a hardware issue but
> since this is the only issue I'm seeing it doesn't seem likely.
I got Pike 7.4.10:
Pike compiled and linked ok, but the following file(s)
failed to compile with full optimization.
This may affect performance negatively.
> From: Kris Kennaway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 11:59:48PM -0500, Darren Henderson wrote:
> >
> > I'm seeing a spontaneous reboot in one very specific
> circumstance that
> > appears to be attributable to the use of gcc with -O2 optimization.
>
> Are you also compil
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 11:37:24AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 09:38:07AM -0600, Bob Willcox wrote:
>
> > Well, I don't use xdm. I always have (for many years now) started the
> > X server using startx, and I do see that startx (which hasn't been
> > changed on my system
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 11:59:48PM -0500, Darren Henderson wrote:
>
> I'm seeing a spontaneous reboot in one very specific circumstance that
> appears to be attributable to the use of gcc with -O2 optimization.
Are you also compiling the kernel with -O2? If so, then "Don't do
that then". -O2 ha
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 04:40:58PM +0100, Mario Pranjic wrote:
> > Is there a possibility that a memory chip is dead (or should I say
> > deadish)?
>
> As I said, the memory died. :)
> The Memtest86 returned a lot of errors. I've replaced the memory module
> and now it seems all right.
It's so ni
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 09:38:07AM -0600, Bob Willcox wrote:
> Well, I don't use xdm. I always have (for many years now) started the
> X server using startx, and I do see that startx (which hasn't been
> changed on my system since last December) does explicitly specify
> "-nolisten tcp" if not tol
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 09:23:47AM -0800, Nathan Kinkade wrote:
>
> This is just another shot in the dark, but I see that you are trying to
> connect to a machine named 'luke'. Maybe your /etc/hosts file was
> overwritten and now name resolution isn't happening like it should
> locally? What hap
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 09:48:10AM -0600, Bob Willcox wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 07:41:45AM -0800, Erick Mechler wrote:
> > :: > For example, if you have xdm starting out of /etc/ttys and you blindly
> > :: > update everything mergemaster tells you to, you might overwrite some of
> > :: > y
Sorry for the delay in replying. Thanks Jukka and Rudolph
for pointing me to the problem.
Both of you were right. I had built perl-5.6.1 from ports in the
build host and my /etc/make.conf had some entries introduced
by the use.perl script.
I just copied the make.conf file to the install host and
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 07:41:45AM -0800, Erick Mechler wrote:
> :: > For example, if you have xdm starting out of /etc/ttys and you blindly
> :: > update everything mergemaster tells you to, you might overwrite some of
> :: > your custom configs.
> ::
> :: Well, I don't use xdm. I always have (
:: > For example, if you have xdm starting out of /etc/ttys and you blindly
:: > update everything mergemaster tells you to, you might overwrite some of
:: > your custom configs.
::
:: Well, I don't use xdm. I always have (for many years now) started the
:: X server using startx, and I do see th
> Is there a possibility that a memory chip is dead (or should I say
> deadish)?
As I said, the memory died. :)
The Memtest86 returned a lot of errors. I've replaced the memory module
and now it seems all right.
Mario Pranjic, dipl.ing.
sistem administrator
Knjiznica, Institut Rudjer Boskovic
---
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 07:24:41AM -0800, Erick Mechler wrote:
> :: > XFree86 does not listen on TCP ports by default. You have to enable
> :: > it if you want this behaviour (see man startx or man xdm).
> ::
> :: Well then I am confused. I didn't change XFree86. I only updated the
> :: system. W
:: > XFree86 does not listen on TCP ports by default. You have to enable
:: > it if you want this behaviour (see man startx or man xdm).
::
:: Well then I am confused. I didn't change XFree86. I only updated the
:: system. Why would I suddenly see this new behavior?
For example, if you have xdm
14 matches
Mail list logo
