Bastion host

2001-08-31 Thread Ronan Lucio
Hi All, I intending to install a Bastion host to increase the security in my net but I have some doubts about the techinical work of it. For all I understood, I will need 3 machines to do a mail server and a web server which: 1-bastion host, 2-mail server, 3-web server. The main doubt is how th

Re: FreeBSD and Athlon Processors

2001-08-31 Thread Mike Porter
On Friday 31 August 2001 02:22 am, Darryl Okahata wrote: > > Heh. I'm writing this on an Asus A7M266 (I didn't want to wait for > the nForce). Speaking of whichare the freeBSD team working on supporting the nForce (does anyone know?) or are we going to have to wait for support? (I gue

Re: FreeBSD and Athlon Processors

2001-08-31 Thread Mike Murphree
On Thursday 30 August 2001 08:17 pm, Darryl Okahata wrote: > "Juha Saarinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It's probably not the Athlon CPU that's the issue for either FreeBSD or > > Linux, but the motherboard chip sets. From personal experience, the > > first Linux 2.4 kernels weren't very happy

SSH problems since update

2001-08-31 Thread Hartmann, O.
Hello. I got this morning the lastest cvsupdate for 4.4-RC. After successful compilation and installation, reboot, one of our servers is not longer available via SSH. sshd on this machine reports the follwoing error: Aug 31 14:21:36 atmos sshd[42563]: fatal: DH_generate_key Does anyone

Re: FreeBSD and Athlon Processors

2001-08-31 Thread Ted Sikora
Allen Landsidel wrote: > > At 01:22 8/31/2001 -0700, Darryl Okahata wrote: > > > Do a google groups search on "via chipset ide corruption". You > >might be surprised at what you find. Just because you don't have > >problems, doesn't mean that the problem doesn't exist. > > Ok I'll give y

RE: FreeBSD and Athlon Processors

2001-08-31 Thread Albert D. Cahalan
Juha Saarinen writes: > It's probably not the Athlon CPU that's the issue for either FreeBSD > or Linux, but the motherboard chip sets. From personal experience, > the first Linux 2.4 kernels weren't very happy with VIA chip sets, > which are commonly used for Athlon boards. It's mainly IDE issu

problem with sound with 4.4-RC

2001-08-31 Thread dak
hello, when i compile my kernel with 'device pcm', next boot i see: pcm0: cannot allocate bus resource.device_probe_and_attach: pcm0 attach returned 6 and the sound doesn't work. i don't know what sound card i have because i'm on a laptop it is a Compaq Presario model 12XL408 serie 1200 in descr

Re: Where did /etc/issue go from telnetd? (fwd)

2001-08-31 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
telnetd(8) sessions are not serviced through getty(8). Instead, you can utilize the `welcome' attribute of login.conf(5) file. On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 11:32:31AM +0930, Jarrod Sayers wrote: > [originally posted to BUGA] > > /etc/gettytab still lists if=/etc/issue just incase you ask :) > > Jarr

Re: FreeBSD and Athlon Processors

2001-08-31 Thread Allen Landsidel
At 01:22 8/31/2001 -0700, Darryl Okahata wrote: > Do a google groups search on "via chipset ide corruption". You >might be surprised at what you find. Just because you don't have >problems, doesn't mean that the problem doesn't exist. Ok I'll give you that much. But the flip side of tha

Re: FreeBSD and Athlon Processors

2001-08-31 Thread Darryl Okahata
Allen Landsidel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yeah. As long as you avoid motherboards with the VIA KT133A/KT133 > >chipset and the VIA 686B Southbridge, you're probably fine (not all such > >motherboards supposedly have problems, but how do you tell the > >difference?). For more info, che

Re: StarOffice woes on 4.4RC

2001-08-31 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi, I suspect a wrong library, thus it is the linux_base port. Can you do some debugging with kdump and strace ? Martin Martin Blapp, [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Improware AG, UNIX solution and service provider Zurlindenstrasse 29, 4133

Re: FreeBSD and Athlon Processors

2001-08-31 Thread Allen Landsidel
At 18:17 8/30/2001 -0700, Darryl Okahata wrote: > Yeah. As long as you avoid motherboards with the VIA KT133A/KT133 >chipset and the VIA 686B Southbridge, you're probably fine (not all such >motherboards supposedly have problems, but how do you tell the >difference?). For more info, check