On 2001.07.24 19:41 jett wrote:
> im running freebsd 4.3-stable and every friday night i'm updating my
> sources via cvsup. my question is do i have to always build the world
> after every cvsup so that i may stay stable?
>
> jett
>
Please turn off the double-pump of HTML. It makes replying a
I
don't. I just run a buildworld/makeworld when there is a security advisory. That
gives me an excuse to go through the process.
Your
milage my vary..
Todd
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
jettSent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 10:
im running freebsd 4.3-stable and every friday
night i'm updating my sources via cvsup. my question is do i have to always
build the world after every cvsup so that i may stay stable?
jett
Hi,
Has anyone one figure out how to get the media player in KDE 2.1.1
(Noatun) to work in FreeBSD? I don't know whether it's an incompatibility
between KDE and FreeBSD or just a misconfiguration.
Sung N. Cho
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" i
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 09:12:25PM -0700, Ray Kohler wrote:
> 7/24/01 5:04:04 PM, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 07:11:29PM -0400, Ray Kohler wrote:
> >> On Tue, 24 Jul 2001 15:52:32 -0700
> >> Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Tue, Ju
Hahaha, couldn't be put any better than that! I think our solution is just
to have one windows machine to watch lara croft and her jiggly breasts which
crashs all the time and loads of FreeBSD machines to use while the windows
one doesn't work!
Rgds.
Scott Taggart
- Original Message -
Fr
I'm having a very difficult time getting cvsup to run via socks5. I'm using
socks5 from to ports for a socks client.
Here's a little snippit of what's happening.
jester# telnet cvsup2.freebsd.org 5999
Trying 205.149.189.91...
telnet: connect to address 205.149.189.91: Connection refused
hi, there
i have a problem to type multi-byte language in BitchX and mutt(not in
editor mode, but in-line text type mode such as 'subject' line) after
'make world' to 4.3-STABLE on july 11, 2001.
of course, there were not any problem before the system rebuild date.
one more interesting things a
7/24/01 5:04:04 PM, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 07:11:29PM -0400, Ray Kohler wrote:
>> On Tue, 24 Jul 2001 15:52:32 -0700
>> Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 06:47:04PM -0400, Ray Kohler wrote:
>> >
>> > > Something c
Hi,
You can't search, but you can browse...
Regards
-T.W.Chan-
On Wed, 25 Jul 2001, Gregory Bond wrote:
> Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 09:12:18 +1000
> From: Gregory Bond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Jordan Hubbard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Regarding hw.ata.wc="1"..
Yes, I have been out of school for a long long time. Therefore I
know that there's a lot more to the world than school junior. In
the real world where my income, my partners' income, and my
employees income depend on the reliablility of the service we
sell I need a reliable server OS and FreeBSD
On 2001.07.24 10:09 j mckitrick wrote:
>
> For day to day use (programming, netscape, email, etc) will wc on show
> any
> performance improvement?
>
> jcm
> --
> o-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-o
> | Jonathon McKitrick ~ |
> | "I prefer the term 'Art
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 07:11:29PM -0400, Ray Kohler wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jul 2001 15:52:32 -0700
> Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 06:47:04PM -0400, Ray Kohler wrote:
> >
> > > Something committed recently (within the last 24 hours) has broken
> > > network
Jason Andresen wrote:
>
> j mckitrick wrote:
> >
> > For day to day use (programming, netscape, email, etc) will wc on show any
> > performance improvement?
>
> It's hard to tell. You might try switching it on for a week and see
> if YOU notice any difference. If it doesn't seem to do anythi
j mckitrick wrote:
>
> For day to day use (programming, netscape, email, etc) will wc on show any
> performance improvement?
It's hard to tell. You might try switching it on for a week and see
if YOU notice any difference. If it doesn't seem to do anything for
you, then just turn it back off
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 10:12:41AM -0700, John Merryweather Cooper wrote:
| On 2001.07.24 10:09 j mckitrick wrote:
| >
| > For day to day use (programming, netscape, email, etc) will wc on show
| > any
| > performance improvement?
| >
| > jcm
| > --
| > o-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
On Sun, 22 Jul 2001 03:56:26 +0200 (SAST)
The Psychotic Viper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
TV> Sure it takes time to to backup user data, reinstall of multiple machines
TV> but it may save a lot of time when you have to keep rebuilding your
TV> machine because your visitor keeps getting back in. A
On Mon, 23 Jul 2001 09:52:49 +0200 (CEST)
"A. L. Meyers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
AM> A comparison:
AM> Debian GNU/Linux has 3 trees: 1. stable 2. testing 3. unstable
RELENG_4_3, RELENG_4, 'Top of Tree' (in CVS terms)
security, stable, current(in release name ter
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Gunnar Flygt writes:
> I have a machine running 4.3-RELEASE cvsuped via the RELENG_4_3 branch.
> What's the best way to see to that I have the new telnetd on the
> machine? I saw that the cvsup gave me a lot of changes to the telnetd
> files, but also to two other f
For day to day use (programming, netscape, email, etc) will wc on show any
performance improvement?
jcm
--
o-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-o
| Jonathon McKitrick ~ |
| "I prefer the term 'Artificial Person' myself." |
o-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
> What ridiculous, unsubstantiated flame-bait.
Call it lack of coffee and a bad hangover.
After reading your post, the issue becomes clearer. To be honest, I
immediately assumed an argumentative stance because the (most
recent) thread was started with
From: Mike Hoskins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Regarding hw.ata.wc="1"..
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 08:53:02 -0700 (PDT)
> Unfortuneately then, the reason I chose FreeBSD (server-tuned OS) so
> many years ago is no longer valid. Of course, I knew this would
What ridiculous, unsubstantiate
> From: Morten Vinding Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 10:27:30 +0100
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Just remove the "disable", recompile and your kernel will have APM support.
>
> Btw. is there another way of enabling a disabled device, than boot using
> boot -c and enable
On Tue 2001-07-24 (12:14), Mixtim wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 08:12:58AM -0700, Mike Hoskins wrote:
> > Hmm. I hope the response to recent performance tests was /not/ to make a
> > potentially unsafe option 'default'.
>
> Its only unsafe if you lose power. I think that anyone running a
> "s
Don't resurrect this thread - it already ran long enough the first
time and had plenty of argument advanced on both sides. Go read the
mailing list archives if you feel a deepseated personal need to go
through the decision process in agonizing detail because that's what
we did already.
- Jordan
On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Shawn Workman wrote:
> > Its only unsafe if you lose power. I think that anyone running a
> > "server" without a UPS deserves to lose data.
First, there's an infinite number of variables that can lead to power
loss. Think about it.
> Especially the ones without recent back
26 matches
Mail list logo
