On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 10:12:41AM -0700, John Merryweather Cooper wrote:
| On 2001.07.24 10:09 j mckitrick wrote:
| >
| > For day to day use (programming, netscape, email, etc) will wc on show
| > any
| > performance improvement?
| >
| > jcm
| > --
| > o-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-o
| > | ~~~~~~~~~~~~ Jonathon McKitrick ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| > | "I prefer the term 'Artificial Person' myself." |
| > o-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-o
| >
| >
| > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
| >
|
| Try it . . . the answer is yes . . . and like everything else
| in life (especially entities that are "built for speed"), it's
| a calculated risk.
I figure I have a battery pack anyway for the laptop, but I wondered if such
a light load would benefit from write-caching anyway, with softupdates
running as well.
jcm
--
o-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-o
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~ Jonathon McKitrick ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| "I prefer the term 'Artificial Person' myself." |
o-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-o
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
