Re: Staying *really stable* in FreeBSD

2001-06-27 Thread Jordan Hubbard
This looks really good! Ship that baby! :) - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

Re: Staying *really stable* in FreeBSD

2001-06-27 Thread Gerhard Sittig
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 13:13 -0600, Mike Porter wrote: > On Wednesday 27 June 2001 09:44, Bill Moran wrote: > > > > Is there a reason why you took this off the list? > > my mistake (or my mailer's depending on how you look at it). > If the majordomo config file for the list included the line > "

Whence Stallion support for -Stable?

2001-06-27 Thread Gregory Bond
[Cc'd to stable and bugs. Please reply to bugs only] The driver for Stallion multiport cards in 4-Stable is quite old. It doesn't support many of the newer cards, in particular the EasyIO-PCI card, nor any card manufactured since about 1998, which have a newer and unsupported UART chip. The dr

Re: make buildkernel and conventional kernel build fail

2001-06-27 Thread Dima Dorfman
Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is anyone else experiencing this problem? On two separate machines now, > cvsup'd to -STABLE, I get the following error when trying to compile. > Doesn't matter if it's GENERIC, or my customer kernel... i get the same > thing either way: Have you done a bui

make buildkernel and conventional kernel build fail

2001-06-27 Thread Paul
Is anyone else experiencing this problem? On two separate machines now, cvsup'd to -STABLE, I get the following error when trying to compile. Doesn't matter if it's GENERIC, or my customer kernel... i get the same thing either way: cc -c -pipe -march=pentiumpro -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnest

Undesirable behaviour of burncd erase

2001-06-27 Thread Andrew Reilly
Hi all, but particularly Soren, I run FreeBSD 4.3-STABLE #5: Sat Jun 16 11:45:32 EST 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GURNEY on a CPU: Pentium III/Pentium III Xeon/Celeron (499.15-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x672 Stepping = 2 Features=0x387f9ff real mem

RE: Staying *really stable* in FreeBSD

2001-06-27 Thread Bill Moran
On Wednesday, June 27, 2001 5:30 PM, Juha Saarinen [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Bill Moran wrote: > > > In a company, alpha testing is done by the developers or other > > employees of the company, > > Once Upon A Time this was true, but no longer. Viz. Microsoft's > "Te

RE: Staying *really stable* in FreeBSD

2001-06-27 Thread Bill Moran
On Wednesday, June 27, 2001 3:14 PM, Mike Porter [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > On Wednesday 27 June 2001 09:44, Bill Moran wrote: > > Is there a reason why you took this off the list? > > > my mistake (or my mailer's depending on how you look at it). If the > majordomo config file for the li

RE: Staying *really stable* in FreeBSD

2001-06-27 Thread Juha Saarinen
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Bill Moran wrote: > In a company, alpha testing is done by the developers or other > employees of the company, Once Upon A Time this was true, but no longer. Viz. Microsoft's "Technology Preview" editions of various pieces of software. Due to lengthening development cycles,

Re: Staying *really stable* in FreeBSD

2001-06-27 Thread Juha Saarinen
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Nik Clayton wrote: > I've rewritten section 19.2.2.1 and 19.2.2.2 at > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/current-stable.html > > Do people think this gets the point across any better? Yep! It's now abundantly clear. -- Regards, Juha PGP fing

Re: Staying *really stable* in FreeBSD

2001-06-27 Thread Mike Porter
On Wednesday 27 June 2001 09:44, Bill Moran wrote: > Is there a reason why you took this off the list? > my mistake (or my mailer's depending on how you look at it). If the majordomo config file for the list included the line "reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]" then all replies would by defualt go ba

Re: Staying *really stable* in FreeBSD

2001-06-27 Thread Nik Clayton
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 09:41:18AM -0500, Christopher Schulte wrote: > > At 11:44 PM 6/26/2001 +0100, Nik Clayton wrote: > >I've rewritten section 19.2.2.1 and 19.2.2.2 at > > > > > >http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/current-stable.html > > > >Do people think this gets th

Re: Staying *really stable* in FreeBSD

2001-06-27 Thread Nik Clayton
On Sun, Jun 24, 2001 at 02:34:03AM -0700, Jordan Hubbard wrote: > From: "Juha Saarinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Staying *really stable* in FreeBSD > Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 12:00:59 +1200 > > > "19.2.2.2. Who needs FreeBSD-STABLE? > > If you are a commercial user or someone who puts max

RE: Staying *really stable* in FreeBSD

2001-06-27 Thread Bill Moran
Is there a reason why you took this off the list? On Wednesday, June 27, 2001 10:52 AM, Mike Porter [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > On Wednesday 27 June 2001 07:11, you wrote: > > On Tuesday, June 26, 2001 5:07 PM, Chad R. Larson [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > wrote: > > > If anyone is taking vot