Hi,
I tried to install Freebsd 4.3 Release on IBM Netfinity 5000 with ServeRaid
4L. And it doesn't even detect the drives. Is there anyway to install
Freebsd this server with RAID 5. Are there drivers for servRaid? I know it's
not listed in HARDWARE.TXT
Please help me.
Regards
dimuthu
_
Mike Porter writes:
> [Lots of rambling ideas ...]
First of all Mike, quite an interesting post. Unfortuantely, either the
author of the book didn't understand or didn't explain the CMM well
enough for you to be able to use it.
I have worked as a Software Quality Engineer (really doing Quality,
Hello,
I synced the ports tree yesturday, but am having problems with 3 ports:
1) Mozilla
2) Minicom
3) Netscape Navigator
Here we go:
1) Mozilla:
Building deps for nsCSSFrameConstructor.cpp
c++ -o nsCSSFrameConstructor.o -c -DOSTYPE=\"FreeBSD4\"
-DOSARCH=\"FreeBSD\" -DOJI -D_IMPL_NS_HTML -D
:% vmstat -m -M /var/qmail/crash/vmcore.6
:Memory Totals: In UseFreeRequests
:17408K137K 7909365
:% vmstat -z -M /var/qmail/crash/vmcore.6
:
:ZONEusedtotal mem-use
:PIPE55 4088/63K
:SWAPMETA0 0 0/0K
I thought that dfr was supposed to be taking care of this...maybe not anymore.
On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 11:06:20AM +0100, Rasputin wrote, and it was proclaimed:
> * Glenn Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010614 20:27]:
> > On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 02:36:00PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > S
I'd like to know if there is a time window where -STABLE is most likely
to not be getting updated. This should allow us to avoid grabbing and
building source that by chance has some changes only partially checked
in and then getting strange behaviour or build errors.
I heard mention on this l
I also was getting these errors, along with some odd behaviour in the ports
tree. I ended up simply blasting out my src and cvs files and pulling
everything down from scratch. Certainly a case of useing a broadswoard for a
letter opener, but it worked.
If you're getting these errors, be aware tha
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Scott Lambert wrote:
> It should have been cleared up by now with a nightly cvsup. Mine boxes just
> had the two instances where they downloaded all the libpam stuff. After that,
> it was business as usual.
>
> So, are you saying you get to download those files each time yo
I think it's become clear in this discussion that some people
reguard -stable as the secure, regularly updated moving release canidate.
Other people view -stable as a just stable enough branch for developers to
coordinate building new functionality.
If the 2nd view is the official one, then a new
On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 08:59:03AM +1200, Juha Saarinen wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Scott Lambert wrote:
>
> > But how many CVSups on each machine.
>
> I run a daily cvsup cron job (well, it's nightly, really). I get the error
> messages if I do 'make update' in /usr/src as well.
>
>
> > The
JK> All of your problems can be traced back to old hardware or inexperience
with the latest thinking in BSD land. Because you have not upgraded
your 2.x system, you are essentially stuck. Either get newer hardware
to work with or go through the upgrade based on your subscription disks.
While th
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Scott Lambert wrote:
> But how many CVSups on each machine.
I run a daily cvsup cron job (well, it's nightly, really). I get the error
messages if I do 'make update' in /usr/src as well.
> There was a commit of libpam stuff that
> didn't work. Some time later the commit w
On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 08:36:18AM +1200, Juha Saarinen wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, John Polstra wrote:
>
> > No fix is needed. The message is telling you that CVSup has noticed
> > a problem and is fixing it itself. CVSup _will_not_ give you a bad
> > update unless your underlying hardware (
JW> I react rather badly to some of your comments concerning the usability
of
JW> FreeBSD. Our goal *should* be a simple and turnkey system, or at the
least,
SH> That would be a RELEASE. They are usually pretty good at being just that
IMHO.
No, usability follows from design and functionality. T
14 matches
Mail list logo
