Re: fat32 slower than dogshit?

2001-05-11 Thread Donn Miller
Lamont Granquist wrote: > > Well, i think it is, i'm actually not too sure exactly how fast dogshit is > in the first place. But in doing a simple untar on a fat32 partition > using both 4-stable a couple days after release and a recently updated > 4-stable as of yesterday (5/10) it goes about 2

RE: What gives?

2001-05-11 Thread Otter
If you really question your ports tree, just rm -rf /usr/ports/* and cvsup again. -Otter > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David W. Chapman > Jr. > Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 6:06 PM > To: Roelof Osinga; Rasputin > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED

fat32 slower than dogshit?

2001-05-11 Thread Lamont Granquist
Well, i think it is, i'm actually not too sure exactly how fast dogshit is in the first place. But in doing a simple untar on a fat32 partition using both 4-stable a couple days after release and a recently updated 4-stable as of yesterday (5/10) it goes about 20-30 times slower than an untar on

Re: What gives?

2001-05-11 Thread David W. Chapman Jr.
The most common thing I find is leftovers, like a Makefile.inc or a work directory, do a make clean on them, I periodically do a make clean in /usr/ports. I know there is probably a more efficient way to do it, but I just let it go for a while. You could also do it before you install somethings,

Re: What gives?

2001-05-11 Thread Roelof Osinga
Rasputin wrote: > > >... > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1955761 May 10 00:30 gnome > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 636835 May 10 02:46 kde2 > > Freaky - those two both work for me. > > Sounds like your ports tree is shafted, because the ports work for others. Interesting suggestion. Never min

Re: What gives?

2001-05-11 Thread Roelof Osinga
Kris Kennaway wrote: > > ... > There's nothing wrong with the xemacs21 port. You could go and fetch > the package to prove this (if the port was broken, the package > wouldn't build). Granted that the xemacs example was a bad one. But never mind, I've already been asked, off-list, to stop was

Re: sendmail traffic analysis

2001-05-11 Thread Mark Drayton
jack ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Today Garrett Wollman wrote: > > > >I'm not sure how to monitor sendmail with SNMP, and would be > > >interested in hearing from others what tools they use to monitor > > >SMTP traffic on their FreeBSD systems. > > > > Depends on what and how you want to monitor.

Re: Sound (PCM) in 4.3

2001-05-11 Thread Curtis King
On Fri, 11 May 2001 15:45:42 +0100 (BST) George Reid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 11 May 2001, Curtis King wrote: > > > > Some error messages (boot -v dmesg, pciconf -l etc) would help. > > > > Here is some more information as my SB Live doesn't work either. > > You seem to have the "P

Re: sendmail traffic analysis

2001-05-11 Thread jack
Today Garrett Wollman wrote: > >I'm not sure how to monitor sendmail with SNMP, and would be > >interested in hearing from others what tools they use to monitor SMTP > >traffic on their FreeBSD systems. > > Depends on what and how you want to monitor. For BIND, I wrote a > little script that stu

Re: 4.3-STABLE panics while mounting CD-R

2001-05-11 Thread Thomas David Rivers
> > Is it an audio cd? I've experienced the instant panic when mistakenly > trying to mount such as a cd9660 fs. Of course it shouldn't panic, > but the workaround is not to do that. I get similar situations when mounting the 4.2-RELEASE 3rd CD for reading packages... This is with a 4.2-RE

Re: sendmail traffic analysis

2001-05-11 Thread Garrett Wollman
In article <20010511172756$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: >I'm not sure how to monitor sendmail with SNMP, and would be >interested in hearing from others what tools they use to monitor SMTP >traffic on their FreeBSD systems. Depends on what and how you want to monitor. For BIND, I wrote a littl

Re: 4.3-STABLE panics while mounting CD-R

2001-05-11 Thread Barney Wolff
Is it an audio cd? I've experienced the instant panic when mistakenly trying to mount such as a cd9660 fs. Of course it shouldn't panic, but the workaround is not to do that. Barney Wolff On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 01:24:46AM +0800, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > Hi! > > 4.3-STABLE built 26 April 2001

Re: sendmail traffic analysis

2001-05-11 Thread Steve Mickeler
On Fri, 11 May 2001, Arthur W. Neilson III wrote: > Recently I setup FreeBSD 4.3 on a HP Netserver (SMP) at my workplace > and am stoked to be using FreeBSD for a production server in a predominantly > Microsoft oriented distributed computing environment. It's a wonderful > opportunity to show h

sendmail traffic analysis

2001-05-11 Thread Arthur W. Neilson III
Recently I setup FreeBSD 4.3 on a HP Netserver (SMP) at my workplace and am stoked to be using FreeBSD for a production server in a predominantly Microsoft oriented distributed computing environment. It's a wonderful opportunity to show how well FreeBSD performs :^). This is the first time I've