Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> ...
> There's nothing wrong with the xemacs21 port. You could go and fetch
> the package to prove this (if the port was broken, the package
> wouldn't build).
Granted that the xemacs example was a bad one.
But never mind, I've already been asked, off-list, to stop wasting
that persons time in this manner.
Might as well, I guess.
Roelof
PS a package only shows that that specific port could be build
with those specific options at that specific time.
PPS ok, I need to work some on my resolve <g>
--
_______________________________________________________________________
eBOAź est. 1982
http://eBOA.com/ tel. +31-58-2123014
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=Information_request fax. +31-58-2160293
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
