On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 11:00:04AM +0200, Sven Huster wrote:
[...]
> Another thing is that i want to run different local daemons depending on
> the machines (ip's or hostnames), or machine groups
> So what i thought is to add the same function as for /etc to /usr/local/etc,
> maybe which the enhan
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Nick Sayer writes:
> Nick Sayer wrote:
>
> > Amanda has begun timing out one of my slower clients. I have tracked this
> > down and it appears to be the fact that generating the estimates takes
> > much, much longer now than it used to.
> >
>
> Just to add more i
Believe me, I know. I copied that code verbatim from pkg_version.
--David Bushong
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 08:18:37PM +0200, Karsten W. Rohrbach wrote:
> David Bushong([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.04.24 21:05:17 +:
> >
> > Snag a copy from: http://www.euphorion.com/people/dbushong/pkg_upgrade
>
Mike Hoskins writes:
>
> Assuming clients on the internal network initiate all conversations, a
> stateful rule chain would fix this...
>
> ipfw allow ip from ${oip} to any keep-state out
Since the original question was discussing UDP traffic by games, does
this work with UDP messages
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote:
> That question in itself is enough to start a war just as which is better,
> Linux or FreeBSD. Each have their pros and cons.
Is there any web pages out there that lists the pros and cons of each? I
searched through Yahoo and didn't get far... M
Karsten W. Rohrbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> types:
> Mike Meyer([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.04.25 09:59:49 +:
> > If the FTP site uses some obscure mechanism like accounts, that might
> > be a problem. But I don't think that's the case here.
> every ftp site uses some obscure mechanism like accounts.
Graywane wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 07:28:39AM -0700, Nick Sayer wrote:
> > Amanda has begun timing out one of my slower clients. I have tracked this
> > down and it appears to be the fact that generating the estimates takes
> > much, much longer now than it used to.
>
> I tried using du
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 07:28:39AM -0700, Nick Sayer wrote:
> Amanda has begun timing out one of my slower clients. I have tracked this
> down and it appears to be the fact that generating the estimates takes
> much, much longer now than it used to.
I tried using dump for the first time the other
We already answered that question a few times indirectly, the answer is no.
- Original Message -
From: "Stephen H. Kapit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 1:09 AM
Subject: Seagate Cheetah Drives
> Are there any issues with using the Cheetah 15k rp
Are there any issues with using the Cheetah 15k rpm drives with freebsd in an
external raid array?
Thanks.
Stephen
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> This is better, but if you can compile a debug kernel as described in
> the handbook, it will show more information from those crashdumps and
> allow pinpointing of exactly which line of code is causing it to fail.
Very cool. I'll do that a.s.a
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 10:48:23AM -0500, Mike Meyer wrote:
> > I'm thinking through the automation of this right now. There are issues
> > with loops in the dependency graph which need to be detected and
> > resolved. Detection should not be an issue, resolution is
> > tougher. The "build twice"
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 12:53:00PM -0500, Sean Kelly wrote:
Did you update the share/mk directory using cvsup?
Kris
> This is from a world from around 6 hours ago:
>
> ===> secure/lib/libcrypto
> "/usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypto/Makefile", line 62: Malformed conditional
>(${MACHINE_CPU:Mi686})
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 09:53:44AM -0400, Jaime Kikpole wrote:
> As requested, the following are the gdb -k output from the two
> kernel panics' core files. Backtraces included. Thanks in advance for
> any advice or insights that you guys have to offer.
This is better, but if you can comp
If you are using the kernel built from make buildkernel/installkernel, the
kernel is not built with PPPoE options. That is built with GENERIC.
You have to rebuild your kernel with the options for PPPoE.
Please refer PPPoE section of handbook.
(http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO_8859-1/books/han
> On 2001.04.22 00:56 Brent wrote:
> > I have a 4.1 FBSD running NAT & IPFW acting as a gateway machine for my
> > internal network...i have the kernel to deny by default..all seems to be
> > working good...ive opened up what ports i needalthough i cant seem
> > to
> > get quake ports to ope
* Ilya Martynov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010425 13:49]:
> I'm trying to upgrade to 4.3-STABLE and I've found that my kernel
> doesn't want to build because its config has wrong option
> ATA_ENABLE_ATAPI_DMA. Have been this option removed in 4.3? I did not
> found anything related neither in /usr/src/
This option has been moved to the kernel loader. Check out the ata manpage.
This was discussed in the list a few weeks back.
Rods
-Original Message-
From: Ilya Martynov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 April 2001 13:44
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: What's happened with kernel option
Hello,
> I'm trying to upgrade to 4.3-STABLE and I've found that my kernel
> doesn't want to build because its config has wrong option
> ATA_ENABLE_ATAPI_DMA. Have been this option removed in 4.3?
Yes.
Try the hw.ata.ata_dma or hw.ata.atapi_dma sysctl instead.
---
Cat you ping the other end of the tunnel from your dual-homed machine? If
so, it is probably a routing issue.
--
---
Dipl.-Inform. Martin Ibert - phone: +49-30-20631-607, fax: -199
- ASDIS Software AG, Neue Grünstraße 25, D-10179 Berlin
Hi,
I'm trying to upgrade to 4.3-STABLE and I've found that my kernel
doesn't want to build because its config has wrong option
ATA_ENABLE_ATAPI_DMA. Have been this option removed in 4.3? I did not
found anything related neither in /usr/src/UPDATING, in release notes
or in mailist search results
I work for an ISP and Im running a 4.1 FBSD w/ 2 nic cards w/ nat and ipfw
as a gateway machine (also known as a duel home host) for my internal
network w 70 nodes...im trying to
setup a gre-tunnel between my 192.168.0.1/24 network and our parent
companies 192.168.150.1/24 in another state.
on
Yes that did fix the problem. I have seen this before
myself but totally forgot about it.
Thanks
--- Jamie Heckford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, the fact the card is detected shows it has some
> form
> of support, as drivers use a unique device ID to
> identify themselves.
>
> I don't claim
hello stable,
i just started using natd
from 4.3-RC, and undestand that this had been discussed lately, but i still
don't find conclusion. using natd in verbose, i find these:
In [UDP] [UDP]
203.106.241.176:138 -> 203.106.241.255:138 aliased
to [UDP]
203.106.241.176:138 -> 203
Hi,
Well i was upgrading one box from 4.3-RC to 4.3 and got an error in another
part. On another 4.3-stable server, i got the exact same as is shown below.
Is there a fix for this?
Thanks,
Lanny
Pod2man is in my path, and one fix (one i don't like) was to # openssl in
/etc/make.conf.
On
> NAME
> pkg_update - update an installed package
Nice utility -- any chance of a switch to make it do a build rather
than a pkg_add to install the new packages ? I;d fix that myself,
but sadly I dont do perl.
-pete.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-
Hi there,
1.
maybe it is after the release of FreeBSD-4.3 possible to think about the
remaining mount_null in /etc/rc.diskless* again.
the two solutions i see are:
- seperate mount_mfs for /tmp
- symlink /tmp to /var/tmp by default in the scripts
2.
Another thing is that i want to run differen
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 01:46:37PM -0700, Sean Chittenden wrote:
> I get that quite often and have been for a few years. Are you
> sure that an HTTP method couldn't be made available? ftp is an
> expensive protocol because it's interactive, not to mention that the
> protocol designers did
28 matches
Mail list logo
