Dima Dorfman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> types:
> Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Check the -security archives for about 3 or 4 weeks ago -- someone
> > posted a big list of all of the things which the security setting in
> > sysinstall does, which will hopefully make its way into the Offici
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Check the -security archives for about 3 or 4 weeks ago -- someone
> posted a big list of all of the things which the security setting in
> sysinstall does, which will hopefully make its way into the Official
> Documentation at some point.
I've submitte
A minor error, to be sure, but still something that can be corrected.
When I call up the manpage for pkg_check(1), it calls up the pkg_sign(1)
manpage, which describes usage for both programs. The problem is under
the "NAME" section, where it says:
"pkg_sign, check_sign - handle package signatur
Hi
Is there a shell prompt based fan monitor around as I don't have an X-Server
installed?
Gordon
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Meyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Hajimu UMEMOTO" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Se
Erik Trulsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> types:
> On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 07:01:36PM +1100, Kal Torak wrote:
> > Hiyas...
> >
> > I kinda did a fdisk -BI on my main HDD by accident... It killed
> > all my partitions... I tried to get them back with sysinstall and
> > the live file system, but I cant mou
Hajimu UMEMOTO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> types:
> > On Wed, 7 Mar 2001 15:11:15 -0500
> > Chris Faulhaber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > I believe wmlmmon is lmmon in a Gnome(GTK) window.
> jedgar> Ummm, no. :) It is a windowmaker dock app...
>
> GKrellM is GTK+ based monitor that can dis
On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 03:05:44PM -0600, Jeffrey J. Mountin wrote:
> Will be curious to see using -O2 for world and kernel builds will break
> with the new flags. Matt may have given up on it, but it has been working
> (again) for months now. Keep expecting it to break, which these changes
Attention:
Please deal with this spammer on your system/network as it is impacting on
the email boxes of several users on the list to which this message was
sent. I would appreciate a reply back.
Thank You, Jonathan M. Slivko
Systems Administrator, DataSyrge Internet Services
On Wed, 7 Mar 20
On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 08:21:15PM +0100, Attila Nagy wrote:
> It seems that it happens because of UNIONFS. If I start the FTPD-jail with
> a non UNIONFS FTP spool directory everything is OK. (I've tried this with
> mounting a spare UFS partition)
Unionfs is known to be broken, and the warning i
At 02:31 PM 3/7/01 -0500, Russell D. Murphy Jr. wrote:
>Another datapoint. . .
>
>I changed make.conf on, I believe, Dec. 6:
>
># CFLAGS= -O -pipe
>CFLAGS= -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -march=pentiumpro
>
>(There's also:
>
>COPTFLAGS= -O -pipe)
>
>(I gather that -mcpu is redundant.) I r
On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 12:28:29PM +0100, Claude Buisson wrote:
> given that the optimization MUST be activated by a CPUTYPE=XXX in
> the user's /etc/make.conf, what is the use of NO_CPU_FLAGS ?
> just needing 2 lines instead of 0 in /etc/make.conf ?
Because you may want OpenSSL ASM optimizatio
> On Wed, 7 Mar 2001 15:11:15 -0500
> Chris Faulhaber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I believe wmlmmon is lmmon in a Gnome(GTK) window.
jedgar> Ummm, no. :) It is a windowmaker dock app...
GKrellM is GTK+ based monitor that can display fan and temperature.
And, there is Gnome'fy p
subscribe freebsd-stable
On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 07:26:09PM +0100, Olgerik Albers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 04:35:17PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >d On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 11:20:55AM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> > >
> > > At 04:12 PM 3/6/01 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > >Despite having my k
I think the point is that you can be no more certain that
Mr. Hartman's problems were *not* caused by setting the -march flag to
i686 than I can be absolutely certain that they were. Given no better
than 50/50 certainty, however, the warning appeared prudent given that
we're unlikely to know with
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 10:35:33PM +1300, Dan Langille wrote:
> Tomorrow I'm going to install a stable snaphot on a client's box. I've
> seen some issues lately in the list. All of which seem to have been
> resolved lately. I'm wondering if I should be going for 4.2-20010306-
> STABLE or
On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 01:34:39AM -0800, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
> From: "Hartmann, O." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: ARCH flag in new make.conf
> Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2001 09:30:33 +0100 (CET)
>
> > I'm really confused and surprised by the fact, that with the upcoming new
> > FreeBSD 4.3 in its make
Tomorrow I'm going to install a stable snaphot on a client's box. I've
seen some issues lately in the list. All of which seem to have been
resolved lately. I'm wondering if I should be going for 4.2-20010306-
STABLE or 4.2-20010303-STABLE.
Any suggestions?
--
Dan Langille
pgpkey - finger [
From: "Hartmann, O." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ARCH flag in new make.conf
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2001 09:30:33 +0100 (CET)
> I'm really confused and surprised by the fact, that with the upcoming new
> FreeBSD 4.3 in its make.conf we can choose architectural parameters for the
> CPU architecture. And
Of course, this won't help you now, but it serves as a clever warning.
Regardless of your backup procedure, it is always wise to make a backup
copy of your boot sector. In fact, as well as on another disk, I believe
you can store a copy on the disk in question itself.
Between the MBR and the fir
On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 10:23:06AM +0100, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> Is this also true for SMP systems?
SMP systems use C code like non-SMP systems; I wouldn't expect -march
to generically make a difference there (i.e. it should be no different
than non-SM
On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Is this also true for SMP systems?
:>On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 09:09:36AM +, Antony T Curtis wrote:
:>> Kris Kennaway wrote:
:>> >
:>> > On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 09:30:33AM +0100, Hartmann, O. wrote:
:>> > > Dear Sirs.
:>> > >
:>> > > I'm really confused
On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 09:09:36AM +, Antony T Curtis wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 09:30:33AM +0100, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> > > Dear Sirs.
> > >
> > > I'm really confused and surprised by the fact, that with the upcoming new
> > > FreeBSD 4.3 in its make.conf w
On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Antony T Curtis wrote:
:>Kris Kennaway wrote:
:>>
:>> On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 09:30:33AM +0100, Hartmann, O. wrote:
:>> > Dear Sirs.
:>> >
:>> > I'm really confused and surprised by the fact, that with the upcoming new
:>> > FreeBSD 4.3 in its make.conf we can choose architect
On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Dear Kris.
I asure you: the only flag was -march=i686 and -O on both kernel
and system code flags.
The phenomenon was that a local ypbind couldn't contact the local or
any remote ypserver and it disappeared exactly then when removing
the i686 option (and
Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 09:30:33AM +0100, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> > Dear Sirs.
> >
> > I'm really confused and surprised by the fact, that with the upcoming new
> > FreeBSD 4.3 in its make.conf we can choose architectural parameters for the
> > CPU architecture. And I will
On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 10:27:15AM +0200, Jacques Marneweck wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This what I'm getting where it breaks:
>
> ===> libdisk
> make: don't know how to make dkcksum.c. Stop
>
> The file dkcksum.c does not exist in the directory where libdisk.
This was fixed about 3 days ago. Please
28 matches
Mail list logo
