RE: 802.1q vlans and STABLE

I am working with VLANs and a BayStack 450-T without stability problems, except when you configure NETGRAPH at the same time. The kernel crashes during boot-up. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Tancsa Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 04

Re: 802.1q vlans and STABLE

On 2001-Feb-22 22:13:20 -0500, Mike Tancsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >are vlans and the fxp driver ready for prime time ? I've been running a system with 6 VLANs on an fxp for about 6 months now without problems. The system has currently been up nearly 3 weeks (following a blackout) and had bee

802.1q vlans and STABLE

Hi, are vlans and the fxp driver ready for prime time ? I have a situation where I would like to deploy a simple network which looks like [network vlan #1]-[cat5500]-[network vlan #2] | | |

Re: ipfw drop syn+fin

> > Say a web client has a few connections to a web server. One of those > > connections is retriving an image (for example). When it's finished, it > > will send a FIN to the server to close that connection. However, at the > > same time, the web client wants to open a new connection to the sa

Something change with threads in recent -STABLE vs Wine?

Sorry in advance for the tragic lack of detail in this message, this is really just a first "heads-up: anyone else seeing this?" message. I'll dig for details as time and interest permit... A month or two ago, while running wine-2001.1.12 from ports, I could run Lotus Notes almost completely suc

subscribe freebsd-stable

subscribe freebsd-stable Zane Taylor.vcf

Re: Xserver won't start

On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 09:00:50PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > Don't do this; install the Xwrapper port instead -- the setuid bit was > removed from the XFree86 in favour of the Xwrapper port for a reason > (improved security). So why not make the XFree86-4 port depend on Xwrapper so confusi

Re: strange port activity

On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 04:23:19PM -0500, Brent wrote: > i just cvsup my and did make world & kernel...--mergemaster...all is > goodso just to tighten things up a bit ..i installed portsentry from the > ports collection...installed without a prob...the FreeBSD box is on a very > large intern

Re: Limits of FreeBSD

Andrew Hesford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> types: > I've been wondering about the limits of FreeBSD on an x86 system. Nobody > has been able to find a straight answer... This question comes up on -questions at irregular intervals, and answers can be found in the archives there. > First, what is the larg

Re: strange port activity

That's probably snmp iirc. On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 04:23:19PM -0500, Brent wrote: > i just cvsup my and did make world & kernel...--mergemaster...all is > goodso just to tighten things up a bit ..i installed portsentry from the > ports collection...installed without a prob...the FreeBSD bo

strange port activity

i just cvsup my and did make world & kernel...--mergemaster...all is goodso just to tighten things up a bit ..i installed portsentry from the ports collection...installed without a prob...the FreeBSD box is on a very large internel network ( its our LAN resourse machine) it runs a bunch of c

Re: cvsup confusion

I just do this every night. A 'crontab -e' as root suffices to install the entries. I've never found the need to create a custom cvsup file, the one in examples works just fine. The log level will list edits cvsup makes. 42 3 * * * /usr/local/bin/cvsup -g -L 2 -h cvsup2.freebs

Re: cvsup confusion

John Polstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> types: > I bet 99% of all users leave their crontab entries for the periodic > scripts unchanged. I expect it's higher than that if you add more precision. First, most users (more than 90%) never fool with software configuration *at all*, though that's probably lo

Re: Matrox G450 and X 4.0.2 = blank ?

> Now I've got a new Matrox Millenium G450 32Mb dual head AGP card, but > I've got also some weird problems... > > Under XF 3, using XF86_SVGA as server, my monitor is totally blank (NEC > FE750). I'm sure this is not a > unsupported-resolution/frequency/scantimes problem, since I've > configured

failed buildworld

i have been chasing this on and off for days. it is dead reproducable. do i have a broken compiler? blew away entire source tree blew away entire object tree cvsupped a complete source and ports trees *default host=cvsup7.freebsd.org *default base=/usr *default prefix=/usr *de

Matrox G450 and X 4.0.2 = blank ?

Hello! My system is 4.2-stable (built few days ago) on a Microstar MS 6321 dual celeron motherboard. The kernel has SMP support enabled. Till yesterday I was using successfully a Diamond Fire GL 1000 Pro AGP card with XFree 3.3.idontremember :) Now I've got a new Matrox Millenium G450 32Mb dual

init : can't exec getty 'usr/libexec/getty' for port

today i upgrading to 4.2-stable, every went smooth until i reboot the box and i got init : can't exec getty 'usr/libexec/getty' for port /dev/ttyv0 init : can't exec getty 'usr/libexec/getty' for port /dev/ttyv1 init : can't exec getty 'usr/libexec/getty' for port /dev/ttyv2 init : can't exec gett

Re: max RAM

On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 01:15:57AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * Lanny Baron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010222 01:14] wrote: > > Hello fellow FreeBSD'ers, > > Would anyone happen to know the maximum amount of RAM that can be seen in a > > system running FreeBSD. > > It should be 4gigs on i386, I