Re: buildworld fails on lptcontrol

On Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 12:44:29 +1000, Clary Harridge wrote: > A recent make world > > FreeBSD 4.0-STABLE (HOST_NAME) #0: Mon Jul 17 10:01:43 EST 2000 > > with files supped 13 Jul 2000 > > fails with > > ===> usr.sbin/lptcontrol > rm -f .depend > mkdep -f .depend -a-I/usr/obj/usr/local/sr

Re: Kernel build numbers and kernel-building methods

William Denton wrote: > > After all the recent chat following that heads-up about how to build a > world, I gave it a shot and rebuilt my system, gave the buildkernel and > installkernel a KERNEL=MYCROFT setting, and adjusted /boot/loader.conf so > it'd load /MYCROFT. All went well, but I notice

Re: 4.0-RELEASE to 4.0-STABLE upgrade

On Sun, 16 Jul 2000, Timothy L. Robertson wrote: >Hi All, > >I just finished upgrading as the subject line says, and I've noticed two >anomalies. > >1) On boot I get the message: >module_register: module netgraph already exists! >linker_file_sysinit "netgraph.ko" failed to register! 17 >I use my

No Subject

unsubscribe freebsd-stable Andrew "Dru" Fitz-Glenville Brown MGMT/STS May 2001 ( Yeah right!) North Hall 218 RPI Residence 110 8th street Troy N.Y. 12180 518-276-7230 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Dance... even if it's only in your own living room when nobody's watchin

Kernel build numbers and kernel-building methods

After all the recent chat following that heads-up about how to build a world, I gave it a shot and rebuilt my system, gave the buildkernel and installkernel a KERNEL=MYCROFT setting, and adjusted /boot/loader.conf so it'd load /MYCROFT. All went well, but I noticed that the kernel build number re

4.0-RELEASE to 4.0-STABLE upgrade

Hi All, I just finished upgrading as the subject line says, and I've noticed two anomalies. 1) On boot I get the message: module_register: module netgraph already exists! linker_file_sysinit "netgraph.ko" failed to register! 17 I use my box as a router to distribute a DSL PPPoE feed to some wind

RE: Upgrading 3.5-STABLE to 4.0-STABLE

At 9:40 PM -0400 7/16/00, Phil Rosenthal wrote: >Is it possible to ignore the "reboot in single mode" part? > >It is not possible to get this system into single mode, because >it has to be up, always. >it can have a maximum downtime of maybe 45 seconds, which is >too long to go into single mode an

buildworld problems (4.0-RELEASE to 4.0-STABLE)

G'day, I've got a copy of 4.0 RELEASE (from the CD) that I've been trying unsuccessfully to update to 4.0-STABLE for the last few weeks. I've been watching this list, and taking note of what I've seen, and my procedure is this : I CVSup the latest source from cvsup3.au.FreeBSD.org (I'm in Aust

buildworld fails on lptcontrol

A recent make world FreeBSD 4.0-STABLE (HOST_NAME) #0: Mon Jul 17 10:01:43 EST 2000 with files supped 13 Jul 2000 fails with ===> usr.sbin/lptcontrol rm -f .depend mkdep -f .depend -a-I/usr/obj/usr/local/src/i386/usr/include /usr/local/src/usr.sbin/lptcontrol/lptcontrol.c /usr/local/src/

Re: Latest RELENG_4.

We (Internet America) have a BUNCH of 4.0-Stable systems in productuion. It's MUCH more stable than 3.x in heavy network environments. Larrym > > Hello, > > What is the latest FreeBSD-STABLE release, and is it stable enough for a > productional system? > > Thanks, > Noor Dawod > > > > To

RE: Upgrading 3.5-STABLE to 4.0-STABLE

Is it possible to ignore the "reboot in signle mode" part? It is not possible to get this system into single mode, because it has to be up, always. it can have a maximum downtime of maybe 45 seconds, which is too long to go into single mode and compile stuff. I know it is obviously more dangerou

Re: Parallel kernel make Was Re: kernel.debug (was Re: HEADS UP! Always use the 'make buildkernel' target to make your kernels)

Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, 16 Jul 2000, Joachim [iso-8859-1] Strömbergson wrote: > > > Just for kicks I tried doing a 'make -j4 buildkernel' with KERNEL=SNP40 > > in /etc/make.conf and /boot/loader.conf. It works, that is the make > > finished without crashing. I dunno i

Re: is the ensoniq 1371 sound chip supported?

Add device pcm to your kernel. (38) sean@pulse: ~ $ cat /dev/sndstat FreeBSD Audio Driver (newpcm) Jun 29 2000 01:10:19 Installed devices: pcm0: at io 0x1080 irq 5 (1p/1r channels duplex) I've got the same card, and it works perfectly. On Sat, 15 Jul 2000, Andreas Ntaflos wrote: > i hav

HEADS UP! Please test new KAME

I meant to send this out yesterday, but forgot. I have merged the KAME code from -current, which brings 4.1 up to the most recent sources from the KAME project (http://www.kame.net). What does this give us? I'm glad you asked :-) * Signficantly improved IPSEC functionality. In particular, IPSEC s