From: "Jim Mock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Wed, 26 Apr 2000 at 18:38:02 -0700, Chad R. Larson wrote:
> > As I recall, Jim Mock wrote:
> > > On Wed, 26 Apr 2000 at 17:42:11 -0700, Chad R. Larson wrote:
> > > > This may have already been discussed on some other list, but I'm
> > > > surprised to find
On Wed, Apr 26, 2000 at 06:38:02PM -0700, Chad R. Larson wrote:
> Yes, but in the past, you could set NO_SENDMAIL in /etc/make.conf so
> it wouldn't be built as part of the base system, and then build and
> install one from the ports. That generally got you the
> latest-n-greatest version. Or, a
On Wed, 26 Apr 2000 at 18:38:02 -0700, Chad R. Larson wrote:
> As I recall, Jim Mock wrote:
> > On Wed, 26 Apr 2000 at 17:42:11 -0700, Chad R. Larson wrote:
> > > This may have already been discussed on some other list, but I'm
> > > surprised to find sendmail has gone missing from the ports
> > >
As I recall, Jim Mock wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Apr 2000 at 17:42:11 -0700, Chad R. Larson wrote:
> > This may have already been discussed on some other list, but I'm
> > surprised to find sendmail has gone missing from the ports
> > collection.
>
> Sendmail isn't in the ports collection, it's in the b
Howdy,
So? BIND is in the ports collection and in the base system. Admittedly,
BIND was added so people could use v8 when v4 was only in the base system,
and has been maintained due to security issues with BIND. It should be the
same with sendmail. However, sendmail does build cleanly for
On Wed, 26 Apr 2000 at 17:42:11 -0700, Chad R. Larson wrote:
> This may have already been discussed on some other list, but I'm
> surprised to find sendmail has gone missing from the ports
> collection.
Sendmail isn't in the ports collection, it's in the base system.
- jim
--
- jim mock - waln
This may have already been discussed on some other list, but I'm
surprised to find sendmail has gone missing from the ports
collection.
Why is this?
-crl
--
Chad R. Larson (CRL15) 602-953-1392 Brother, can you paradigm?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROT
Jordan K. Hubbard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) napisał(a):
> I could certainly make a super-set INDEX file with some sort of CD#
> field (I'd have to extend or munge the current INDEX format) available
> on each of the CDs, sure. That's a good idea.
There is a nice way to handle this in IBM's AIX ... it
On Wed, 26 Apr 2000, Shawn Barnhart wrote:
> How long does it generally take for updates to Samba to make it into the
> stable tree?
That's up to the maintainer.
> I'm curious if RELENG_3 will have 2.0.7 anytime soon -- it fixes some Win2k
> annoyances that are present in 2.0.6.
As another res
On Wed, Apr 26, 2000 at 01:25:18PM -0500, Shawn Barnhart wrote:
> How long does it generally take for updates to Samba to make it into the
> stable tree?
>
> I'm curious if RELENG_3 will have 2.0.7 anytime soon -- it fixes some Win2k
> annoyances that are present in 2.0.6.
>
> The fixes are real
How long does it generally take for updates to Samba to make it into the
stable tree?
I'm curious if RELENG_3 will have 2.0.7 anytime soon -- it fixes some Win2k
annoyances that are present in 2.0.6.
The fixes are really to annoyances, its not totally broken. I'm more
curious how long a new por
subscribe freebsd-stable
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
On Tue, Apr 25, 2000 at 11:18:01PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> Please check your facts before responding. There was a mixup at one
> point early in the openssh import process wherein the default for the
> server was to have X11 forwarding off. Unfortunately, this mistake has
> not been corre
subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
ben schmitz
webmaster
The FreeZone Network
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
v.312.705.3817
f.312.573.3810
http://freezone.com
"To understand is to perceive patterns."
- Isaiah Berlin
begin:vcard
n:Schmitz;Ben
tel;fax:312-597-3810
tel;home:Yeah Right!!
14 matches
Mail list logo
