Today Jeffrey J. Mountin wrote:
> At 10:21 AM 11/17/99 -0800, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> >Will be December 15th. The traditional code slush will go into effect
> >on the 1st. November would be an excellent month for merging your
> >changes, after which I'll be exercising my usual perogative of
On Wed, Nov 17, 1999 at 01:00:51PM +, Josef Karthauser wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 1999 at 09:36:53PM +1100, Andrew Reilly wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 16, 1999 at 09:52:23PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> >
> > I've been watching things happening in the netgraph directory in
> > the CVS mailing list
At 11:30 PM 11/17/99 +0200, John Hay wrote:
>> At 10:21 AM 11/17/99 -0800, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
>> >Will be December 15th. The traditional code slush will go into effect
>>
>> What happened to every 4 months?
>
>I think Jordan is just scared his build machine won't survive the Y2K
>rollover,
Just out of curiosity, how many hours a day do the FreeBSD volunteers on
average spend working on the next STABLE, RELEASE, and CURRENT
incarnations of this wonderful OS?
On Wed, 17 Nov 1999, John Hay wrote:
>> At 10:21 AM 11/17/99 -0800, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
>> >Will be December 15th. The
On Wed, Nov 17, 1999 at 05:09:12PM +, Ben Smithurst wrote:
> Jamie Norwood wrote:
>
> > Should I be worried about this error?
> > ---
> > 8:21am Wed Nov 17 1999 on ttyp5
>diarmadhi:/home/mistwolf> su -
> > Password:
> > panic: kernel trap (igno
> At 10:21 AM 11/17/99 -0800, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> >Will be December 15th. The traditional code slush will go into effect
> >on the 1st. November would be an excellent month for merging your
> >changes, after which I'll be exercising my usual perogative of
> >inspecting all potential chang
At 10:21 AM 11/17/99 -0800, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
>Will be December 15th. The traditional code slush will go into effect
>on the 1st. November would be an excellent month for merging your
>changes, after which I'll be exercising my usual perogative of
>inspecting all potential changes with a
Hi Vadim!
On 17 Nov 99 at 20:51, "Vadim" (Vadim Belman) wrote:
Vadim> with old utilities which don't use uid_t but relay on unsigned
Opps, excuse me for for mistype: I meant 'rely'.
--
/Voland Vadim Belman
E-mail: [EMAIL
On 17 Nov 1999, Vadim Belman wrote:
> Recently I answered a question concerning maximum valid UID
> value. I had created a new user with UID 100 using pw
> utility. Everything went smoothly, but pwd_mkdb warned about
> creation of UID bigger than 65535. I found this p
Recently I answered a question concerning maximum valid UID
value. I had created a new user with UID 100 using pw
utility. Everything went smoothly, but pwd_mkdb warned about
creation of UID bigger than 65535. I found this piece of code in
/usr/src/usr.s
10 matches
Mail list logo