On Tue, 12 Oct 1999, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> Current gossip and rumor may be outdated Real Soon Now. Watch this
> space for updated rumors over the next few months.
Not to co-opt the thread, but will we have a new -current snapshot
CD before the end of the year? Now that I have a sub
At 10:08 AM -0700 1999/10/14, Doug wrote:
> It is cabable of that, but managing this on the scale we're
> talking about with the FreeBSD lists is just not an easy task. This idea
> has been proposed often, and always rejected by the very people you claim
> to want to help.
I can't
"Jeffrey J. Mountin" wrote:
>
> At 06:47 PM 10/14/99 +0200, Vadim Chekan wrote:
> >Tom wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, 14 Oct 1999, Vadim Chekan wrote:
> >> > From FreeBSD-3.2 (I checked this on 4 machines)
> >> > =
> >> > bash-2.03$ host 212.109
On Tue, 12 Oct 1999, Jamie Norwood wrote:
> IIRC, Majordomo is capable of having 'post-ok' addresses, where you can
> do a sort of half-subscription where you can post from an address, but
> not get list mail there.
It is cabable of that, but managing this on the scale we're
talking abou
>From: Michael Oski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>OK, here's a few things to try, in order to break down where the failure
>is.
>
>Since X appears to be "basically" functional (you can open xterm), let's
>try to
>get completely rid of the GNOME/KDE stuff and verify X really IS ok. Go
>into
>/usr/X11R6
At 06:47 PM 10/14/99 +0200, Vadim Chekan wrote:
>Tom wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 14 Oct 1999, Vadim Chekan wrote:
>> > From FreeBSD-3.2 (I checked this on 4 machines)
>> > =
>> > bash-2.03$ host 212.109.34.132
>> > 132.34.109.212.IN-ADDR.ARPA is a
