At 06:47 PM 10/14/99 +0200, Vadim Chekan wrote:
>Tom wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 14 Oct 1999, Vadim Chekan wrote:
>> > From FreeBSD-3.2 (I checked this on 4 machines)
>> > =========================================================
>> > bash-2.03$ host 212.109.34.132
>> > 132.34.109.212.IN-ADDR.ARPA is a nickname for
>> > 132.34.109.212.cscd.lviv.ua
>>
>> IN-ADDR DNS for that block is definitely screwed up, because I can't
>> even get an answer from here.
>
>What do you mean? "host 212.109.34.132" doesn't do any output for you?
"Host not found" or "Operation timed out" depending on what tool is used.
>> Also, "host" in 3.2 can find CNAMEs, so it does not follow the CNAME. I
>> think it does an ANY search.
>> In this case, the "CNAME" has been followed. Probably because "host"
>> did a PTR search instead of any ANY search.
>>
>> Whether "host" follows the CNAME or not is irrelevant. gethostbyname()
>> should still do the right thing.
Yep.
>So this is just strange behavior of 'host'?
>If I understund right this is rather bind issue, not FreeBSD so that
>I'll move to more appropriate maillist :)
Repeatable with dig and nslookup as well. Using 'host' should work, so
most likely something is wrong the configuration. Using 'dig' didn't turn
up any authoratative servers, which is a big hint.
FYI, something changed since a response is now given. Still doesn't look
right. Why it gives a "nickname for" rather than a "domain name pointer"
might be a clue.
ALWAYS do some checking externally from both your network and your upstream
provider(s).
Jeff Mountin - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems/Network Administrator
FreeBSD - the power to serve
'86 Yamaha MaxiumX (not FBSD powered)
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message