On 12.07.2016 1:44, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> On 11.07.2016 21:41, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 02:28:45PM -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
>>
>>> On 07/10/16 10:10 AM, Andrey Chernov wrote:
On 10.07.2016 16:30, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> I am surprised lack of support GOST
On 11.07.2016 21:41, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 02:28:45PM -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
>
>> On 07/10/16 10:10 AM, Andrey Chernov wrote:
>>> On 10.07.2016 16:30, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
I am surprised lack of support GOST in openssl-base.
Can be this enabled befor
On 11.07.2016 21:07, Andrei wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 20:09:35 +0300
> Andrey Chernov wrote:
>> Unfortunately, it affects normal people and organizations here,
>> including internet providers f.e. and not affects Putin or government
>> in any way. Documents workflow require digital signatures b
On 11.07.2016 23:13, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 07:48:44PM +0300, Andrey Chernov wrote:
>
>> On 11.07.2016 19:29, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:04:33AM -0500, Mark Felder wrote:
>>>
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016, at 05:29, Slawa Olhovchenko
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 07:48:44PM +0300, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> On 11.07.2016 19:29, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:04:33AM -0500, Mark Felder wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016, at 05:29, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I.e. GOST will be available in
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 03:00:39PM -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> On 07/11/16 02:41 PM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 02:28:45PM -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> >
> >> On 07/10/16 10:10 AM, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> >>> On 10.07.2016 16:30, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> I am sur
On 07/11/16 02:41 PM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 02:28:45PM -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
>
>> On 07/10/16 10:10 AM, Andrey Chernov wrote:
>>> On 10.07.2016 16:30, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
I am surprised lack of support GOST in openssl-base.
Can be this enabled befo
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 02:28:45PM -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> On 07/10/16 10:10 AM, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> > On 10.07.2016 16:30, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> >> I am surprised lack of support GOST in openssl-base.
> >> Can be this enabled before 11.0 released?
> >
> > AFAIK openssl maintainers
On 07/10/16 10:10 AM, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> On 10.07.2016 16:30, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
>> I am surprised lack of support GOST in openssl-base.
>> Can be this enabled before 11.0 released?
>
> AFAIK openssl maintainers says something like they can't support this
> code and it will become rott
On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 20:09:35 +0300
Andrey Chernov wrote:
> >> As far as I know, GOST is a standardized crypto algo in .ru, it's
> >> suggested (required?) by the government in .ru. So, if FreeBSD does
> >> not want to alienate the .ru userbase, GOST probably should be in
> >> base.
> >>
> >> I'm
On 07/11/2016 07:09 PM, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> On 11.07.2016 19:54, Andrei wrote:
>> On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 18:39:34 +0200
>> Kurt Jaeger wrote:
>>
>>> As far as I know, GOST is a standardized crypto algo in .ru, it's
>>> suggested (required?) by the government in .ru. So, if FreeBSD does
>>> not wa
On 11.07.2016 19:54, Andrei wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 18:39:34 +0200
> Kurt Jaeger wrote:
>
>> As far as I know, GOST is a standardized crypto algo in .ru, it's
>> suggested (required?) by the government in .ru. So, if FreeBSD does
>> not want to alienate the .ru userbase, GOST probably should
On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 18:39:34 +0200
Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> As far as I know, GOST is a standardized crypto algo in .ru, it's
> suggested (required?) by the government in .ru. So, if FreeBSD does
> not want to alienate the .ru userbase, GOST probably should be in
> base.
>
> I'm not sure how difficu
On 11.07.2016 19:29, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:04:33AM -0500, Mark Felder wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016, at 05:29, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
>>>
>>> I.e. GOST will be available in openssl.
>>> Under BSD-like license.
>>> Can be this engine import in base syste
Hi!
> > I.e. GOST will be available in openssl.
> > Under BSD-like license.
> > Can be this engine import in base system and enabled at time 1.1.0?
> > And can be GOST enabled now?
> I think the wrong question is being asked here. Instead we need to focus
> on decoupling openssl from base so this
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016, at 05:29, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
>
> I.e. GOST will be available in openssl.
> Under BSD-like license.
> Can be this engine import in base system and enabled at time 1.1.0?
> And can be GOST enabled now?
>
I think the wrong question is being asked here. Instead we need
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:04:33AM -0500, Mark Felder wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016, at 05:29, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> >
> > I.e. GOST will be available in openssl.
> > Under BSD-like license.
> > Can be this engine import in base system and enabled at time 1.1.0?
> > And can be GOST en
On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 06:28:04PM +0300, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> On 10.07.2016 18:13, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> > On 10.07.2016 18:12, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> >> On 10.07.2016 18:01, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 05:10:04PM +0300, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> >>>
> On 10.0
18 matches
Mail list logo