Stefan Bethke wrote:
> ppp(4) or sppp(4)? Looking at the patch, it seems to be sppp(4), which
> is (completely?) seperate from ppp(4), AFAIK.
Umm... I guess it's sppp(4) actually. NetBSD reported the problem to us
and I didn't realize that we had more than one version of Point-To-Point
Protocol.
Hello everyone,
With the computers equipped with TPM chip popularizing, many OS begin to
support it. And Linux and Vista are some of then. I want to know whether the
FreeBSD Project has a plan to support it and some related technology.
Can anyone answer me?
Ye Zhang (A Developer of Trusted
Am 23.08.2006 um 22:18 schrieb FreeBSD Security Advisories:
III. Impact
An attacker able to send LCP packets, including the remote end of a
ppp(4)
connection, can cause the FreeBSD kernel to panic. Such an
attacker may
also be able to obtain sensitive information or gain elevated
privile
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
=
FreeBSD-SA-06:08.pppSecurity Advisory
The FreeBSD Project
Topic: B
