Stefan Bethke wrote:
> ppp(4) or sppp(4)?  Looking at the patch, it seems to be sppp(4), which
> is (completely?) seperate from ppp(4), AFAIK.

Umm... I guess it's sppp(4) actually.  NetBSD reported the problem to us
and I didn't realize that we had more than one version of Point-To-Point
Protocol.  I'll send out a revised advisory once I'm sure I have all the
details right.

Colin Percival
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to