* David Banning ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I seem to have a lot of memory being eaten by httpd (part output of top);
> Any ideas to have httpd timeout sooner to preserve memory?
MaxRequestsPerChild is there to cope with leaks, it won't help if Apache
is using a lot of memory to start with thou
* David Banning ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > You might also consider switching to something like lighttpd, which
> > uses a single process that's generally about 1/3 the size of an
> > equivilent httpd process.
>
> I like these ideas. Thanks. What is the downside, if any, to using
> lighttpd? Is
* Ken Ebling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> The database server is running FreeBSD 4.11 (had all sorts of
> problems with MySQL after upgrading to 5.x) with mysql-server
> (4.0.24_1, installed from ports, compiled with LinuxThreads)
I'm running MySQL 4.1 on a 5.3-RELEASE dual Opteron (i386), wi
* Peter Schuller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> after spending time and money on several Promise and Sillicon Image
> based cards that don't work properly, I am still in desperate need of a
> stable SATA controller.
Promise are supposed to be one of the better makes when it comes to
documentation a
* Greg 'groggy' Lehey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> There have been issues with growfs in the past; last time I looked
> it hadn't been updated to handle UFS 2. If you don't need the UFS 2
> functionality, you might be better off using UFS 1 if you intend to
> grow the file system.
growfs gained
* michael luch ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I think that the buffer cache on my system is not growing sufficiently
> and wonder if I can I tune it.
>
> Here's a snippet from the output of top on my system:
>
> Mem: 646M Active, 2905M Inact, 174M Wired, 121M Cache, 112M Buf, 5460K Free
> Swap: 512M
* Vizion ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> This system has been built in a mini ATX case and has a Proxim Harmony
> 802.11a Model 8150 PCI card on (I am on a boat - then intention is to
> be able to disconnect it from the ships network, lug it to a position
> in range of a wireless network and do a por
* Chris ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> This annoys me as well, I expect portaudit to alert me when an update
> is available to fix an exploit, but wget has no update so what is the
> point of the warning, there also seems to be no way to shut it up.
portaudit_fixed is only for OS bugs (i.e. associa
* Tony Shadwick ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I'd like to see it done, but I know just enough sh scripting to be
> dangerous. ;)
>
> If it were perl I'd be all over it. Any takers? :)
Well, the relevent bit is actually written in awk :)
The attached patch seems to do the trick. Note portaudi
