* David Banning ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > You might also consider switching to something like lighttpd, which
> > uses a single process that's generally about 1/3 the size of an
> > equivilent httpd process.
>
> I like these ideas. Thanks. What is the downside, if any, to using
> lighttpd? Is it difficult to configure?
No, it's very easy to get working, especially with FastCGI; it's just
not quite as flexible as Apache in many respects. This isn't always (or
even usually) a bad thing, but it depends what your needs are.
--
Thomas 'Freaky' Hurst
http://hur.st/
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
