Hello list,
I'm running 8.3-STABLE and apparently, vmstat won't honor both -i (interrupts)
and -w (repeat display every wait delay seconds) flags at the same time.
The problem also arises with -z.
The manual doesn't mention these flags being incompatible with -w.
Anyone knows if this is inte
On Feb 17, 2013, at 3:44 PM, Jeff Tipton wrote:
> On 02/17/2013 13:13, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>> On 16 Feb 2013, at 16:56, Jeff Tipton wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I upgraded 9.0 -> 9.1 on my netbook and only then found out that there are
>>> no packages for 9.1-RELEASE. On my desktops, I keep
On Feb 19, 2013, at 11:20 PM, "b...@todoo.biz" wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> I am about to start deploying a large system (about 18 To which can grow up
> to 36 To) based on a big Intel platform with lot's of fancy features to have
> turbo boosted platform (ZIL on SSD + system on dongle if I go for
On Feb 20, 2013, at 10:28 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> I have a laptop with FreeBSD -current,
> with ip address assigned via DHCP.
> The laptop has neither a static ip address,
> nor a domain.
>
> I can ping the laptop fine, but cannot
> ssh into it. The sshd is running, /etc/ssh/ssd_config
On Feb 20, 2013, at 10:45 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> From: Fleuriot Damien
> To: me...@bristol.ac.uk
> Subject: Re: cannot ssh into a box with DHCP assigned IP address
> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:31:22 +0100
> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.or
Ok I think you've got a DNS resolution problem here, so when you try to
establish the connection, SSHD tries to resolve your client's hostname.
It fails and times out, however your ssh login gracetime is already over.
You have several options here:
1/ increase the login grace time in sshd_confi
On Feb 20, 2013, at 2:55 PM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> From feenb...@nber.org Wed Feb 20 13:39:28 2013
>
> > From: Fleuriot Damien
> > To: me...@bristol.ac.uk
> > Subject: Re: cannot ssh into a box with DHCP assigned IP addr
On Feb 21, 2013, at 3:34 PM, Bernt Hansson wrote:
> Hello list!
>
> It's me again.
>
> I was happily upgrading my jail make build* and so on.
>
> Make installworld failed with som chflag set on libc.so.7
> so i left jail and went to the host and tought I fixit from there.
>
> I did remove th
On Feb 21, 2013, at 6:22 PM, Bernt Hansson wrote:
> 2013-02-21 18:01, Teske, Devin skrev:
>> Is it the base machine that won't boot? I got this ...
>
> That is correct. So no cd burning no nothing...Well it want to drop in to a
> single shell bla bla bla press enter for /bin/sh
>
>
> libexec
;
> Perhaps someone can host a file on a machine that can be reached via
> /rescue/rcp for you.
> --
> Devin
>
>
>
> From: Bernt Hansson [b...@bananmonarki.se]
> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 9:22 AM
> To: Teske, Devin
> C
On Mar 27, 2013, at 4:54 PM, Joe wrote:
> I have been moving this file forward since about release 5.0.
> Today is tried the do a man sudoers and got no page found.
> The su man page does not reference it.
>
> Has the file been removed?
> Does it maybe belong to some port?
> Any ideas?
>
> Tha
Hello list,
I'm facing this unusual demand at work where we need to time out idle SSH
connections for security purposes.
I've checked the following options from sshd_config but none seems to fit my
needs :
TCPKeepAlive
ClientAliveCountMax
ClientAliveInterval
Basically, I'm trying to defeat
social
> problem--there's always a work-around--and this is a social problem. If
> there is a
> company security policy stating that ssh sessions are not to be left idling >
> 5 min, then
> make sure everyone is aware of this policy and start handing out pink slips
> to
where the were when they were
> last on.
>
> Regards,
> Mikel King
> BSD News
>
>
> From: Fleuriot Damien [mailto:m...@my.gd]
> To: FreeBSD questions [mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]
> Sent: Fri, 03 May 2013 10:28:31 -0400
> Subject: sshd - time out idle
On May 3, 2013, at 5:16 PM, Arthur Chance wrote:
> On 05/03/13 15:28, Fleuriot Damien wrote:
>> Hello list,
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm facing this unusual demand at work where we need to time out idle SSH
>> connections for security purposes.
>>
>
On Jun 26, 2013, at 1:55 PM, Alex Liptsin wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I work with FreeBSD 9.1 RELEASE.
> I had configured VLANs on my server, but I can't find a way to configure VLAN
> priority.
> How can I do it?
>
> Thanks.
???
vlan priority as in… ?
_
Define "high performance" , what are your expectations in terms of concurrent
connections, requests/second and all ?
Allow me to shed some measure of light here, we're running 16x web servers with
nginx doing *permanent* (as in, for all requests) URL rewriting and serving 500
req/s each.
The
On Nov 23, 2012, at 3:46 PM, David Demelier wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to disable the network traffic for specific IPs, for the
> moment I just add to my pf.conf a rule that will block everything for a
> specified table like this :
>
> table
>
> [...] others rules [...]
>
> block from
I don't get what you're trying to show here.
What commands you've run indicate that:
1/ you have an up to date ports tree
2/ one of the installed ports needs to be updated
So what ?
Just run # portmaster libreoffice
I think you might be confused, "new version available" means that you have
On Nov 27, 2012, at 4:27 PM, Greg Larkin wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 11/27/12 4:36 AM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>> On 26 November 2012 21:15, jb wrote:
>>> Tim Daneliuk tundraware.com> writes:
>>>
... One wonders if using svn to keep the ports tree up-t
On Nov 27, 2012, at 6:34 PM, Doug Sampson wrote:
> [...]
>
>> Rules from pf.conf
>>
>>
>> # macros
>> ext_if="xl0"
>> int_if="bge0"
>>
>> tcp_services="{ 22, 993, 5910:5917 }"
>> tcp_priv_services="{ 389, 443 }"
>> proxy_services = "{ 21, 80 }"
>>
On Nov 28, 2012, at 6:36 PM, mike miskulin wrote:
> About to build a replacement system for an older i386 setup. A few
> years ago I had tried the amd64 port on it and found it was frustrating
> as things that just worked on i386 did not on amd64. IIRC ports were
> large annoyance too.
>
> N
On Nov 29, 2012, at 5:19 PM, Gary Aitken wrote:
> Any reasons why one should not clear /var/tmp via periodic.conf?
> ___
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send a
On Nov 29, 2012, at 6:43 PM, dweimer wrote:
> I was trying to setup a test of CARP on two virtual machines running in
> VirtualBox 4.2.4r81684 I am not sure if I have something wrong with my CARP
> configuration or if VirtualBox just doesn't work right with it. I can only
> ping the CARP int
On Nov 30, 2012, at 12:02 PM, Laszlo Danielisz
wrote:
> Hi Everybody,
>
> Recently I've discover the following issues: I can't display my firewalls
> rules, and the firewall is enabled.
> Take a look what is happening:
>
> ktulu# pfctl -s rules
> No ALTQ support in kernel
> ALTQ related
On Dec 4, 2012, at 11:28 AM, "ksg" wrote:
> Do you know if FreeBSD will install with a Intel Core 2 CPU 6400 @ 2.13 GHz
>
> Carlos Griffith
Yes it will.
You'll want the amd64 version, likely.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://
On Dec 4, 2012, at 8:17 PM, dweimer wrote:
> On 2012-12-01 03:14, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>> On 30 November 2012 20:44, dweimer wrote:
>>> On 2012-11-29 14:07, dweimer wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 2012-11-29 12:53, Fleuriot Damien wrote:
>>>&g
On Dec 6, 2012, at 12:47 AM, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> On 12/05/2012 05:42 PM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 6 Dec 2012, at 00:19, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
>>
>>> sudo chown root:wheel my_naughty_script
>>> sudo chmod 700 my_naughty script
>>> sudo ./my_naughty_script
>>>
>>>
On Dec 6, 2012, at 1:35 AM, Kurt Buff wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
>> On 12/05/2012 05:44 PM, Kurt Buff wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Tim Daneliuk
>>> wrote:
I am working with an institution that today provides limited privilege
On Dec 6, 2012, at 9:20 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> --On December 6, 2012 1:19:00 PM -0600 Tim Daneliuk
> wrote:
>>
>> I understand this. Even the organization in question understands
>> this. They are not trying to *prevent* any kind of access. All
>> they're trying to do *log* it. Why? T
On Dec 7, 2012, at 3:09 PM, Brian Blencoe wrote:
> Hello
>
> I am a student, doing a presentation project on FreeBSD. I have been surfing
> your web site, getting some reading done. If you have any good ideas that I
> could include into my presentation, please email me.
>
> Thank You
>
> B
mybsd dam ~
$ uname -r
8.2-STABLE
On Dec 21, 2012, at 2:36 PM, Fbsd8 wrote:
> When issuing the uname -r command what are the different values possible to
> expect?
>
> So far I have this list.
>
> Where X.X = major release . Sub release numbers
> Where y = number 1 through 9
>
> X.X-BETAy
On Jan 7, 2013, at 2:15 PM, Xavier wrote:
> Hi to all,
>
> I try compile lang/gcc port but it stopped with required 'file to patch':
>
> root@casa:/usr/ports/lang/gcc # make
> Making GCC 4.6.3 for i386-portbld-freebsd9.1 [c,c++,objc,fortran,java]
> ===> Found saved configuration for gcc-4.6.3
On Jan 9, 2013, at 2:26 PM, Antonio Olivares wrote:
>>> Give this a try
>>>
>>> setenv UNAME_r "9.0-RELEASE"
>>> freebsd-update fetch update
>>> freebsd-update upgrade -r 9.1-RELEASE
>>
>> Thank you very much! It seems to be working:
>>
>> $ su -
>> Password:
>> %seten UNAME_r "9.0-RELEASE"
On Jan 9, 2013, at 3:56 PM, Warren Block wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jan 2013, Antonio Olivares wrote:
>
>> Dear folks,
>>
>> I am happily running FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE on one of my machines, but I
>> want to move to FreeBSD-RELEASE and use
>> # freebsd-update upgrade -r 9.1-RELEASE
>> but it does not fin
On Jan 9, 2013, at 3:41 PM, Andrei Brezan wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I'm using:
> FreeBSD myhost.mydomain.com 9.0-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE-p3 #0: Tue Jun
> 12 02:52:29 UTC 2012
> r...@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
>
> I want/need to use svn for my ports
On Jan 10, 2013, at 12:38 PM, Mario Lobo wrote:
> Hi;
>
> I have 8-STABLE and I just did,
>
> csup -L 2 src-supfile
>
> with
>
> *default host=cvsup.FreeBSD.org
> *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_8
>
> and it finished with:
>
> Edit src/usr.sbin/zzz/zzz.sh
> Add delta 1.2.32.2 2012.11.17.1
On Jan 10, 2013, at 10:21 PM, Fbsd8 wrote:
> Gökşin Akdeniz wrote:
>> Thu, 10 Jan 2013 14:04:59 -0500 tarihinde
>> Fbsd8 yazmış:
>>> What is the default path for the packages to be stored in?
>>> Is it /usr/packages?
>>>
>> It is "/usr/ports/packages/All".
>>> If that is indeed the default loc
Hello list,
I'm running 8.3-stable r245223 from a mere 2 days ago and am in the process of
building a custom release for our internal use as preconfigured firewalls.
"make release" works pretty fine except for a few quirks here and there.
First of all, I have set EXTLOCALDIR so that the rele
This was brought up a few weeks/months ago and I seem to recall that setting
the interface in *promiscuous* mode (monitoring) in the Host configuration
(read, in your hypervisor) was mandatory.
See if that helps.
On Feb 6, 2013, at 3:03 PM, CeDeROM wrote:
> Hello :-)
>
> I cannot get Bridge
# sysctl -d security.jail.socket_unixiproute_only
security.jail.socket_unixiproute_only: Processes in jail are limited to
creating UNIX/IP/route sockets only
On Feb 6, 2013, at 4:02 PM, Fbsd8 wrote:
> Where do I find the descriptions of what these jail MIBs do?
>
>
> security.jail.param.all
Running 8.3 here and the answer is no.
On Feb 6, 2013, at 5:39 PM, Fbsd8 wrote:
> Is there a way to set these MIBs
> on a per jail bases?
>
> allow.mount.nullfs
> allow.raw_sockets
> cpuset.id
> securelevel
> ___
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org maili
On Feb 6, 2013, at 5:57 PM, Fbsd8 wrote:
> Fleuriot Damien wrote:
>> Running 8.3 here and the answer is no.
>> On Feb 6, 2013, at 5:39 PM, Fbsd8 wrote:
>>> Is there a way to set these MIBs
>>> on a per jail bases?
>>>
>>> allow.mount.nullfs
43 matches
Mail list logo
