>> This path does not exist on ftp.freebsd.org.
>
> Quite so. It's because of this:
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/news/2012-compromise.html
>
> As a consequence, large parts of the package building infrastructure are
> quarantined, pending reinstallation. Also there is a lot of work going
> into
On 02/01/2013 08:00, Zyumbilev, Peter wrote:
> In this case for a new Nas4free machine, will you recommend to base it
> on 9.0 or 9.1 ?
Either. Whichever one works best for you, and if you can't distinguish
them on performance or bug-fixes, choose 9.1.
However, don't fall into the trap of thinki
When it comes to keeping sources, most developer and most large
dislocated and non-centralized projects prefer GIT over Subversion.
FreeBSD has moved from the ancient CVS to Subversion not long ago and I
was wondering why freeBSD would have done this, since Subversion lacks
in so many aspects of a
On 01/02/2013 02:31 AM, O. Hartmann wrote:
> When it comes to keeping sources, most developer and most large
> dislocated and non-centralized projects prefer GIT over
> Subversion.
>
> FreeBSD has moved from the ancient CVS to Subversion not long ago
> and I was wondering why freeBSD would have d
On Tue, 1 Jan 2013 18:59:05 +0330, takCoder wrote:
> thank you for the details mentioned :)
>
> but now, a questions occurred to me about this ssh key.
> as i don't know enough about its process, would you please tell me whether
> this key is a shared key for all ssh clients who send a request? or
I ran into a problem with /usr/include/xlocale/_ctype.h in 9.1
Line 56 is -
#if __GNUC__ && !__GNUC_STDC_INLINE__
but within a tinderbox on a 9.0 system (yes I know that setup isn't
actually supported) using gcc as the compiler __GNUC_STDC_INLINE__ isn't
defined and generates a "!" has no rig
Git is also not BSD licensed. I believe it may require bringing Python into
base as well.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsub
"Mike." wrote:
> My FreeBSD server had been running fine, no issues. This evening I
> tried to update it to 9.1. I don't "update in place", I update by
> wiping the prior version and letting the new version have its way with
> the disk.
>
> Well, 9.1 has issues with my system (dmesg is at the
On Sat, 08 Dec 2012 13:20:43 +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> Yes, 9.1-RELEASE is delayed. Some of that is due to the effects of the
> security compromise, some is down to the release process not being
> pushed through as efficiently as it might be. It is coming. Soon.
After the announcement the
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
>Don't top-post, please.
Sorry for top-posting.. i'll try to keep an eye on it from now on :)
well, cause i got my answer, let's have a conclusion:
According to:
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
>There are a number of k
I am running FreeBSD-9
After installing xorg-minimal by
#pkg_add -r xorg-minimal
and installing fonts by
#cd /usr/port/x11-fonts/urwfonts
#make install clean
I installed Irsis.
The problem occured after I issued the #startx , an error message appeared for
a very short time.I could no
Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 02/01/2013 08:00, Zyumbilev, Peter wrote:
In this case for a new Nas4free machine, will you recommend to base it
on 9.0 or 9.1 ?
Either. Whichever one works best for you, and if you can't distinguish
them on performance or bug-fixes, choose 9.1.
However, don't fall i
Been using same script for years to fetch selected port files.
Today I get error message
Unknown collection "ports-sysutils"
Running 9.1 and this worked in 2012
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fr
On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 10:14:17 -0500, Fbsd8 wrote:
> Been using same script for years to fetch selected port files.
> Today I get error message
> Unknown collection "ports-sysutils"
>
> Running 9.1 and this worked in 2012
Maybe this is related to the removal of CVS-related services
for obtaining sr
On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 04:20:25PM +0100, Polytropon wrote:
>
> Have you tried checking out via SVN which now is the desired
> default method (even though it's not integrated in the base
> install and the "make" scripting mechanism)?
ISTM that SVN is not the default method for users; but portsnap
On Wednesday 02 January 2013 10:14:17 am Fbsd8 wrote:
> Been using same script for years to fetch selected port
> files. Today I get error message
> Unknown collection "ports-sysutils"
>
> Running 9.1 and this worked in 2012
>
It must have to do with the security incident that took
place a couple
Polytropon wrote:
On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 10:14:17 -0500, Fbsd8 wrote:
Been using same script for years to fetch selected port files.
Today I get error message
Unknown collection "ports-sysutils"
Running 9.1 and this worked in 2012
Maybe this is related to the removal of CVS-related services
for
On 1/2/2013 at 2:38 PM Fabian Keil wrote:
|"Mike." wrote:
|
|> My FreeBSD server had been running fine, no issues. This evening I
|> tried to update it to 9.1. I don't "update in place", I update by
|> wiping the prior version and letting the new version have its way
with
|> the disk.
|>
|> W
Joe Altman wrote:
On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 04:20:25PM +0100, Polytropon wrote:
Have you tried checking out via SVN which now is the desired
default method (even though it's not integrated in the base
install and the "make" scripting mechanism)?
ISTM that SVN is not the default method for users;
On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 10:34:54 -0500, Fbsd8 wrote:
> Polytropon wrote:
> > On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 10:14:17 -0500, Fbsd8 wrote:
> >> Been using same script for years to fetch selected port files.
> >> Today I get error message
> >> Unknown collection "ports-sysutils"
> >>
> >> Running 9.1 and this worked
Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
On Wednesday 02 January 2013 10:14:17 am Fbsd8 wrote:
Been using same script for years to fetch selected port
files. Today I get error message
Unknown collection "ports-sysutils"
Running 9.1 and this worked in 2012
It must have to do with the security incident that too
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 448, Issue 3, Message: 24
- please pardon the loss of threading -
On Wed, 2 Jan 2013 02:47:41 -0500 (EST) d...@safeport.com wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Jan 2013, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>
> > On 02/01/2013 05:20, doug wrote:
> >> Is this command being phased out? pkg_ad
Polytropon wrote:
On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 10:34:54 -0500, Fbsd8 wrote:
Polytropon wrote:
On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 10:14:17 -0500, Fbsd8 wrote:
Been using same script for years to fetch selected port files.
Today I get error message
Unknown collection "ports-sysutils"
Running 9.1 and this worked in 201
On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 11:08:24 -0500, Fbsd8 wrote:
> Polytropon wrote:
> > On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 10:34:54 -0500, Fbsd8 wrote:
> >> Polytropon wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 10:14:17 -0500, Fbsd8 wrote:
> Been using same script for years to fetch selected port files.
> Today I get error mess
Hello.
I want to write a script, where I as a normal user, can back up my files
with rsync to another machine (pc01), which shares a directory via NFS.
I have an entry in the local machines /etc/fstab
pc01:/backup /mnt/backupnfs rw,noauto 0 0
The command:
mount /mnt/back
Mike. wrote:
[snip]
>
> Thanks for the reply. The disk in question has never been used for
> RAID, so if there is RAID metadata on the disk, I do not know how it
> got there. The disk is (I believe --- it's been a while since I have
> been inside that box) on a Promise SATA RAID controller, but
2013-01-02 17:29, Leslie Jensen skrev:
Hello.
I want to write a script, where I as a normal user, can back up my files
with rsync to another machine (pc01), which shares a directory via NFS.
I have an entry in the local machines /etc/fstab
pc01:/backup /mnt/backupnfs rw,noauto
Michael Powell wrote:
Mike. wrote:
[snip]
Thanks for the reply. The disk in question has never been used for
RAID, so if there is RAID metadata on the disk, I do not know how it
got there. The disk is (I believe --- it's been a while since I have
been inside that box) on a Promise SATA RAID c
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Leslie Jensen wrote:
>
> I was on a wired connection first and the on wifi so I had two different
> IP-addresses!
>
> New question:
> Instead of having the following in my /etc/exports
>
> /backup machine01 machine02
>
> Can I put my internal network as 192.168.0/24
On Wed, 2 Jan 2013 11:08:24 -0500
fb...@a1poweruser.com wrote:
> This 9.1 release was released prematurely. It has more problems
> them 5.0 had which had a re-release 2 weeks later to fix problems.
This is FUD. Stop being afraid of change.
Users use portsnap
Power users use svn
There's no use t
Hi
This can be considered a follow up to the message "How to keep
freebsd-update from trashing custom kernel?" sent to this list by Brett
Glass on August 13th 2012 (see [1]). Unfortunately there is no solution
to the problem in that thread (or I cannot see it).
I am running currently running 9.0-
On Wed, 2 Jan 2013 17:47:15 +0100
Leslie Jensen wrote:
> I was on a wired connection first and the on wifi so I had two different
> IP-addresses!
FYI a cool trick is to bridge your ethernet and wifi so you can keep your IP
and roam between wired and wireless :)
On 02/01/2013 14:42, Fbsd8 wrote:
> what is the status of
> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-current/Latest/
> which is on the ftp servers?
The latest packages there are what was compiled before the security
incident. It hasn't been updated since.
Cheers,
M
Mark Felder wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jan 2013 11:08:24 -0500
fb...@a1poweruser.com wrote:
This 9.1 release was released prematurely. It has more problems
them 5.0 had which had a re-release 2 weeks later to fix problems.
This is FUD. Stop being afraid of change.
Users use portsnap
Power users use sv
When issuing the portsnap command will it automatically
read the /etc/portsnap.conf file or is the -f option mandatory?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any ma
On 01/02/13 10:08, Fbsd8 wrote:
Still behind the 8 ball.
No, I'm sorry but that's you.
The new "pkg" is not part of the base in 9.1
and there is no ftp packages for 9.1 and the
disc1.iso media I installed from has no packages.
I don't know what crap you're talking, but if you would have in
Well,
I understand your concern. I've been using the freebsd-update method
since several years now and mostly remotely. I've never encounter a
problem. I haven't recompiled everything many times as I didn't really
found a tangible advantage in this method but I've never thought about
this. I believ
Good afternoon and happy new year to everybody.
I'm just curious about auth.conf.
According to the detailed release notes
(http://www.freebsd.org/releases/9.1R/relnotes-detailed.html):
"auth.conf(5) has been removed because it was deprecated years
ago.[r238481]"
but according to the man pages on
--On January 2, 2013 6:45:50 PM +0100 andreas scherrer
wrote:
Hi
This can be considered a follow up to the message "How to keep
freebsd-update from trashing custom kernel?" sent to this list by Brett
Glass on August 13th 2012 (see [1]). Unfortunately there is no solution
to the problem in tha
For some reason my email hasn't apparently been delivered so I'm re-sending it.
"From: ASV
To: Jose Garcia Juanino
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:Re: Newbie question about freebsd-update: single user mode is
not needed anymore?
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 17:19:19 +0100
Hi Jose,
with the freebsd-update method you don't need to pass through the "make
installworld" as it's a binary patch/upgrade system.
Using "freebsd-update upgrade -r 9.1-RELEASE" for example allows you to
get your system patched directly without recompiling the kernel and the
userland but getting
On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 12:27:41 -0500, Fbsd8 wrote:
> When issuing the portsnap command will it automatically read the
> /etc/portsnap.conf file or is the -f option mandatory?
It will use /etc/portsnap.conf by default. No need for -f unless you need
to use a different config file.
By the way, in a
The confusion comes from the fact that the original behavior of
freebsd-update was NOT to update the kernel binaries if a custom kernel was
detected.
FYI my /etc/freebsd-update.conf has
# Components of the base system which should be kept updated.
#Components src world kernel
Components src world
on 2.1.13 19:15 Paul Schmehl said the following:
> --On January 2, 2013 6:45:50 PM +0100 andreas scherrer
>> And from experience this is what it will do: replace /boot/kernel/kernel
>> which is my custom kernel with a GENERIC kernel.
>>
>> As it seems that freebsd-update works by comparing a hash
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 11:18 AM, andreas scherrer wrote:
This is no longer true, though it was true at the time that was written...
-
> However, freebsd-update will detect and update the GENERIC kernel in
> /boot/GENERIC (if it exists), even if it is not the current (running)
> kernel of the
--On January 2, 2013 8:18:38 PM +0100 andreas scherrer
wrote:
on 2.1.13 19:15 Paul Schmehl said the following:
--On January 2, 2013 6:45:50 PM +0100 andreas scherrer
And from experience this is what it will do: replace /boot/kernel/kernel
which is my custom kernel with a GENERIC kernel.
As
--On January 2, 2013 1:46:25 PM -0600 Paul Schmehl
wrote:
--On January 2, 2013 8:18:38 PM +0100 andreas scherrer
wrote:
on 2.1.13 19:15 Paul Schmehl said the following:
--On January 2, 2013 6:45:50 PM +0100 andreas scherrer
And from experience this is what it will do: replace
/boot/kerne
On 02/01/2013 20:55, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> I wasn't thinking when I wrote this. Freebsd-update pulls *binary*
> copies of files, so you're not ever going to get the src files to
> rebuild your kernel from freebsd-update. You need to pull those in
> using svn.
Not so. Take a look at /etc/freebsd
Walter Hurry wrote:
On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 12:27:41 -0500, Fbsd8 wrote:
When issuing the portsnap command will it automatically read the
/etc/portsnap.conf file or is the -f option mandatory?
It will use /etc/portsnap.conf by default. No need for -f unless you need
to use a different config fil
I've used STABLE for years, but with csup going away, I don't want to
deal with adding extra packages, and keeping them unbroken, just to stay
up date. Running freebsd-update doesn't work for people running STABLE,
and I'm not sure freebsd-update will work properly anyway if I compile
world fo
On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 00:43:36 +0100, Fbsd8 wrote:
Walter Hurry wrote:
On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 12:27:41 -0500, Fbsd8 wrote:
When issuing the portsnap command will it automatically read the
/etc/portsnap.conf file or is the -f option mandatory?
It will use /etc/portsnap.conf by default. No need fo
I have a system that boots 9.0+patches (claims to be 9.1-PRERELEASE but
that's a stretch in this case) off an ssd on sata0 - I needed some mfi
patches.
Now that mfi is working, I have a raid1 pair on the mfi controller, and
I've unpacked 9.1-RELEASE onto it using bsdinstall.
Now, the crappy
Michael Ross wrote:
On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 00:43:36 +0100, Fbsd8 wrote:
Walter Hurry wrote:
On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 12:27:41 -0500, Fbsd8 wrote:
When issuing the portsnap command will it automatically read the
/etc/portsnap.conf file or is the -f option mandatory?
It will use /etc/portsnap.conf b
On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 20:06:47 -0500, Fbsd8 wrote:
> Thanks that was it.
> Sometimes your to close to the trees to see the forest.
But you wouldn't have needed any REFUSE lines if you had followed my
suggestion and just extracted the ports you wanted.
_
Walter Hurry wrote:
On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 20:06:47 -0500, Fbsd8 wrote:
Thanks that was it.
Sometimes your to close to the trees to see the forest.
But you wouldn't have needed any REFUSE lines if you had followed my
suggestion and just extracted the ports you wanted.
After doing portsnap
guys,
it was bill joy and friends who clued me in on how-to use the
vi that he was writing in the late 70's. I've been stuck on that
editor--or VIIM in recent years. Bill's original editor became
COPYRIGHT of UNIX {TM}, and of course you just didnt me
I've been trying to get baresip to work on my FreeBSD 9.x laptop and
haven't had much success. I register successfully to callcentric.com and
it appears that I can connect and there is a stream of data coming
through based on the status display:
[0:00:08] audio=0/0 (bit/s) []
How
Solar Window
Solar Collecter Windows (Interior Mounted) - University Tested and Solar
Rejector Windows all in one
A 4' X 4' In'Flector window insulator can produce as much heat as a 600 watt
electrical heater per sunlight hour and reflect up to 72% of the room heat back
into the room! Du
On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 12:27:41 -0500, Fbsd8 wrote:
> When issuing the portsnap command will it automatically
> read the /etc/portsnap.conf file or is the -f option mandatory?
Judging from "man portsnap", the file will be read automatically
at start unless you specify a -f file.
-f conffile R
On Wed, 2 Jan 2013 18:24:14 + (UTC), Walter Hurry wrote:
> By the way, in answer to your question in another thread, you don't have
> to extract the whole tree if you don't want to. Use 'portsnap fetch' the
> first time around, and then portsnap extract the port you want. See 'man
> portsnap
On Wed, 2 Jan 2013 18:53:05 -0800, Gary Kline wrote:
> one reason ive stuck with vim-as-vi was of the colors that vim
> defaults to. I'v fought the dark/crap/puke brown /
> color that seems to be the default on my linux desktop. it's hard
> to see my block cursor when I
El día Thursday, January 03, 2013 a las 08:03:42AM +0200, Ross escribió:
> Hello.
>
> Can you please recommend a webcam and microphone that will work in
> skype under FreeBSD?
Hello,
See http://wiki.freebsd.org/WebcamCompat
matthias
--
Sent from my FreeBSD netbook
Matthias Apitz
Hi,
El día Wednesday, January 02, 2013 a las 08:19:11PM -0800, Joseph Olatt
escribió:
>
> I've been trying to get baresip to work on my FreeBSD 9.x laptop and
> haven't had much success. I register successfully to callcentric.com and
> it appears that I can connect and there is a stream of dat
63 matches
Mail list logo
