> On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 11:36:32 +0100,
> Alex Zbyslaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
>>> Sandy
>>> Rutherford
>>> Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2005 10:52 PM
>>>
>>>
>>> In order to boost read performance, a RAID card should interleave
>>> reading from a RAID-1 volu
On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 16:13 +0200, Julien Gabel wrote:
> >> Cvsup'd system last weekend but was unable to complete portupgrade due
> >> to following error:
> >> ELF binary type "3" not known
> >> execution of expat-1.95.5_2 script failed, exit status 255
> >> ELF binary type "3" not kno
Hi all,
In relation to my previous post(s) (I no longer know the subject line),
my freebsd mail server died again, this time while I was doinga portsdb
-uU ... it got halfway through and crapped out.
Any ideas would help as we're kind of in the middle of a mail transfer,
Regards,
Matt
_
Hi all,
I was going through a few servers tonight and came across this in
/var/log/messages. This particular server functions mainly as our
primary webserver. Its running FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE. I decided to take
a closer look to see what was generating these entries by loading up
trafshow.
> Jun 21 21:50:55 mx1 /kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 230
> to 200 packets per second
> Jun 21 21:51:23 mx1 /kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 222
> to 200 packets per second
> Jun 21 21:53:02 mx1 /kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 230
> to 200 packets p
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 01:05:32 -0700
"Ted Mittelstaedt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> >-Original Message-
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Fafa Hafiz
> >Krantz
> >Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 12:56 PM
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject
In the last episode (Jun 21), Troy G. said:
> I was going through a few servers tonight and came across this in
> /var/log/messages. This particular server functions mainly as our
> primary webserver. Its running FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE. I decided to
> take a closer look to see what was generating t
Hi,
I must missunderstand how to use regex(3).
>From what I read in the man page, pmatch[i].rm_so is the begining of
the i-th match in the regular expression and pmatch[i].rm-so is the
end.
So if I try to match the regex "a(.)c" on the string "abc" I should
have: pamtch[1].rm_so=1 and pmatch[1].
Hi,
Vulpes Velox wrote:
Ignorant useless users should be supported by commercial ventures,
not community ones. They will just drag the community down with their
weight if they don't help out.
This would be the real tough one.
There should also be a way to write some kind of descripton for th
Thanks Stuart for reminding me of my alternative install options.
I'll try installing over serial tomorrow. I've never had to install
off anything but a CD, so it will be a good learning experience for me
anyway. Now to just dig out that old 486 and track down a Null modem
cable. . . .
Daniel,
Yesterday I ruined my partition table on one of my machines.
Luckely this machine was almost an exact copy of another that still is
running fine.
So, I can follow the procedure of copying one disk to another (following
the handbook). But this requires a fysical removal / action on the
machines and
> I must missunderstand how to use regex(3).
To add a bit, running the same program on Linux gives the expected results:
regexpr=a(.)c
number of substrings=1
return from regexec=0
nmatch=0
p0.so=0 p0.eo=0
p1.so=0 p1.eo=0
p2.so=0 p2.eo=0
p3.so=0 p3.eo=0
return from regexec=0
nmatch=1
p0.so=0 p0.eo
101 - 112 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
