On Fri, 6 May 2005, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 08:55:56PM -0700, Luke Dean wrote:
I was using 5.4-RC1 until today.
Today I attempted to update to 5.4, but I can't get into single-user mode
without a panic. I'm just about certain that this is because of the work
in progress in tha
On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 00:05 -0700, Luke Dean wrote:
> I've managed to get 5.4-RELEASE installed, but I absolutely cannot get
> into single-user mode. I've tried selecting option 4 from the boot menu
> and just running a "shutdown now" from multiuser mode.
> I think something about my configura
Danny Pansters writes:
> Now you lump me into some self defined "geek community".
I didn't say anything about you.
> Apparently I don't respect the rule of law now. Isn't that slander?
FYI, slander is verbal defamation; written defamation would be libel.
If you truly don't respect the rule of
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 02:49:23AM +0200, Alex de Kruijff wrote:
> >
> > Well, the "Mailing lists" link on http://www.FreeBSD.org/ homepage
> > points on
> > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/eresources.html#ERESOURCES-MAIL
>
> That true and this would be a fine argument i
Marc Fonvieille writes:
> All, and I said "All", mailing list subscribing forms mention their
> archives ("To see the collection of prior postings to the list, visit
> the freebsd-blahblah Archives."). It is impossible to miss it.
Then why do so many forms require that you tick a checkbox to ass
Dear Sirs,
do I need to clean RW disk before writing ?
why it says errors to me:
design# burncd -f /dev/acd0 format dwd+rw
burncd: format media type invalid: Unknown error: 0
Cheers,
Ilia Chipitsine
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://li
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 03:18:40PM +0600, Ilia Chipitsine wrote:
> Dear Sirs,
>
> do I need to clean RW disk before writing ?
>
No. You should be able to "rewrite" on a DVD+RW without any blacking
operation.
> why it says errors to me:
>
> design# burncd -f /dev/acd0 format dwd+rw
> burncd: fo
I am looking for a FAQ about dynamic devices:
In 5.3 (and 5.4..) SCSI devices nodes (/dev/pass*) are created when
discovered (at boot or when running "camcontrol rescan ... " )
How to change the permissions on the /dev/pass* ? (not manualy of
course ;-)
OK, I can wrote a shell for this but if ther
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Marc Fonvieille writes:
>> All, and I said "All", mailing list subscribing forms mention their
>> archives ("To see the collection of prior postings to the list, visit
>> the freebsd-blahblah Archives."). It is impossible to miss it.
> Then why do
Hey!
> Offlist because this sounds like a general networking thing rather than
> anything fbsd-specific.
Alright. But just incase though ...
> Name resolution of nextgentel.{com,net} looks ok from here, if those IP
> addresses are accurate. When you say your nameserver is broken, what
> exactly
Hello Alex (and Jan)!
> It could be that type slave files need to go in the subdirectory slave
> and type master files need to go in the subdirectory master.
named doesn't give me any errors.
As I previously stated, my setup has been running flawlessly for months.
> Check you /var/log/messages
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 04:44:16AM +0200, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
> Alex de Kruijff writes:
>
> > Where these persons prosecuted lately?
>
> No. The first I heard of these problems was probably a good 20 years
> ago or so, and they probably predated that. Nevertheless, it is
> standard practic
Hey!
> I personally find the old methode a lot easier to read, compared to
> the new one. If a change is wanted, why not make such a thing like
> this a kernel option?
Are you referring to the indenting?
Yeah your eyes would have to jump. A sacrifice necessary for order.
But the changes were no
> If only I was all of them. Point being, you're gonna make it, you'll
> survive. Enjoy the publicity, I'm sure you'll have the tabloids
> calling to ask who The GREAT FAFA is.
Hehe :)
I go under many names.
> I'm kinda forced to laugh about people suggesting the use of DMCA and
> other copyrig
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 11:45:35AM +0200, X3K6A2 wrote:
> > Marc Fonvieille writes:
>
> >> All, and I said "All", mailing list subscribing forms mention their
> >> archives ("To see the collection of prior postings to the list, visit
> >> the freebsd-blahblah Archives."). It is impossible to miss
> I recall hearing of an announcement to comitters list that they'd get a vote.
> - though that's not on http://logo-contest.freebsd.org/announce.txt
Now we are talking :)
> > They've certainly earned it.
>
> Yes.
Uhuh! Ain't nothing wrong with that.
--
Fafa Hafiz Krantz
Research Designer
Alex de Kruijff writes:
> So? As long as your system is protected by a password nobody has a legal
> defence.
Unfortunately they do. For example, if they guess a user name and
password and it works, they can enter your system and claim that they
believed it was okay because nothing told them oth
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 11:39:16AM +0200, regisr wrote:
> I am looking for a FAQ about dynamic devices:
> In 5.3 (and 5.4..) SCSI devices nodes (/dev/pass*) are created when
> discovered (at boot or when running "camcontrol rescan ... " )
> How to change the permissions on the /dev/pass* ? (not man
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 01:36:11PM +0200, Marc Fonvieille wrote:
> On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 11:39:16AM +0200, regisr wrote:
> > I am looking for a FAQ about dynamic devices:
> > In 5.3 (and 5.4..) SCSI devices nodes (/dev/pass*) are created when
> > discovered (at boot or when running "camcontrol re
Thanks for helping.I couldn't do anything with the fixit disk.Is there
some method or tool using which I can copy all files in the ufs partiton
to some other partition using DOS,Windows,or Linux(my kernel won't
support ufs.) .Something like ltools which allows me to copy,delete
files in ext2 partit
Sorry.My linux kernel does support ufs.Anyway for working with ufs on
linux see
http://ufs-linux.sourceforge.net/
Sorry for the trouble.
On Sat, 07 May 2005 18:14:50 +0530, "Koushik Narayanan"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Thanks for helping.I couldn't do anything with the fixit disk.Is there
> some
Thank you for your replies.
I got a hint off-list that this could be ipfilter:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/79988
Looking at my first kernel trap error, I see I also had the (swi1: net)
and on -CURRENT, I can't compile kernel with IPFILTER enabled, nor does
it compile as a mo
>> You have to use devfs(8) facility (man devfs).
> Anything that exists at boot time can be configured (ownership,
> permissions and links) in /etv/devfs.conf. Stuff like USB that can be
> hotplugged should be configured in /etc/devfs.rules for ownership and
> permissions and in /etc/usbd.conf fo
I am having an odd issue with setting the correct timezone in KDE. I have set
the correct timezone from the command line and it seems to stay for a while,
but eventually is reverting to UTC time. I should be in Central Daylight
time (Americas/Chicago). If I try to set the correct timezone fro
Stevan Tiefert wrote:
if I want to do a uptime-record I have always the possiblity to shut
down daemons (when needed) and start them again, without rebooting the
system! That is very nice! I had many days and weeks running my nicely
freebsd-server. BUT every time I updated the patchlevel (in exa
Anthony Atkielski wrote:
> Marc Fonvieille writes:
>
>
>>All, and I said "All", mailing list subscribing forms mention their
>>archives ("To see the collection of prior postings to the list, visit
>>the freebsd-blahblah Archives."). It is impossible to miss it.
>
>
> Then why do so many forms
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 06:10:00AM -0500, Fafa Hafiz Krantz wrote:
> Fafa has already been threatened with his doom.
> Some members on this list, it seems, ain't got no heart.
It always strikes me as odd when people refer to them self in 3d person.
Anyhow, as many have said before me, I think tha
On May 6, 2005, at 2:35 PM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Bart Silverstrim writes:
A) You sent messages to unknown hundreds or thousands of people on the
mailing list, all of which could have a cached copy of your messages,
and now wonder about privacy?
I've explained the differences before; perhaps I n
Christopher Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Simple question: how can I tell what version of the system binaries
> I'm running? Flame-proofing follows.
>
> Searches on this mailing list and google tell me 'uname -a' is the
> ticket, but that doesn't seem to get what I want.
No, it isn't. Tha
This keeps coming up time and time again. Why don't we simply put up
a message on the subscription page that says if you subscribe you
agree that your messages will be archived for public viewing. End of
story. No more bitchy emails on this subject, no more heated debates
and much more time devo
ravi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 05/06/05 16:39, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> > ravi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> i looked at the 20040723 entry again, but there is nothing more to do
> >> (in my case) listed there. also 20040723 gives instructions for 5.x,
> >> FreeBSD-current, -stable a
On May 6, 2005, at 2:42 PM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Bart Silverstrim writes:
Yeah, cuz, we wouldn't want the archives to be referenced for people
who are looking for help on topics, after all.
Do you think that subscribers would refuse to grant permission to have
their posts archived? If so, does
On May 6, 2005, at 2:43 PM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Roland Smith writes:
On the page where you subscribe to a mailing list there is a link to
the
list archives. The existance to this link implies a public accessible
archive of the list. If you don't like that, don't subscribe.
You cannot be sure
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 04:05:09PM +0100, Chris Hodgins wrote:
> This keeps coming up time and time again. Why don't we simply put up
> a message on the subscription page that says if you subscribe you
> agree that your messages will be archived for public viewing.
Maybe it should be in the mai
On May 6, 2005, at 2:48 PM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Paul Schmehl writes:
Before you start spouting legal advice on a public list, I would
suggest
that you point to chapter and verse that *specifically* addresses
posts
made to a public forum that *explicitly* states that such posts will
be
archi
On May 6, 2005, at 2:50 PM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Al Johnsonn writes:
This advice is more ridiculous than telling him to put aerosol spray
back
into a can.
Where's the flaw in it? That's what the DMCA is for.
Betwen this and the claim about "stopping traffic in third party non-US
sites becaus
On 5/6/05, Paul Keyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm setting up a server running Freebsd 5.3 I have
> mysql running well but I can't seem to get it to start
> automatically at boot time. I can only start it as
> root with the command:
> mysqld_safe --user=mysql &
>
> (when I do th
On May 6, 2005, at 3:53 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote:
I doubt seriously your *extremely* strict interpretation of copyright
would hold up in any court of law in the US or anywhere else for that
matter. I have no doubt that you could find a judge somewhere to rule
in your favor. After all, judges make
On May 6, 2005, at 8:14 PM, Chris wrote:
Hahaha - good stuff! Yanno, last I knew (and that was some time ago)
You
had to submit writings for review to the copyright folks here in the
U.S.
Then, if they deem it so, you then had to pay a fee to have it
copyrighted. As I said - this may or may not
On May 6, 2005, at 8:17 PM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Absolutely! Copyright doesn't protect anyone from making a fool out
of themselves.
So I see. But that is not the purpose of copyright.
Proven time and time again :-)
___
freeb
On Fri, 6 May 2005, Noah wrote:
FreeBSD-4.11-p3
nagios-2.0b3
I am attmepting to reinstall nagios-2.0b3 from /usr/ports. and cant seem to
figure out how to get the configuration option window back again
before building.
'make clean' does not work
and
'rm -rf /var/db/ports/nagios/*' did not remove a
On May 7, 2005, at 7:15 AM, Alex de Kruijff wrote:
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 11:45:35AM +0200, X3K6A2 wrote:
Marc Fonvieille writes:
All, and I said "All", mailing list subscribing forms mention their
archives ("To see the collection of prior postings to the list,
visit
the freebsd-blahblah Archive
Hi:
I was thinking of getting one of these two books. I want to learn
more about how UNIX and in particular, FreeBSD work. Has anyone read
either of these books?
UNIX Internals: The New Frontiers
by Uresh Vahalia
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0131019082/ref=pd_bxgy_img_2/104-69
On 5/7/05, Jon Drews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi:
>
> I was thinking of getting one of these two books. I want to learn
> more about how UNIX and in particular, FreeBSD work. Has anyone read
> either of these books?
>
> UNIX Internals: The New Frontiers
> by Uresh Vahalia
>
> http://www.am
On 5/7/05, Chris Hodgins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you are interested in Unix and FreeBSD this is a good choice:
>
> http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/tg/stores/detail/-/books/0201702452/reviews/026-9762435-1924466
>
Thank you Chris:
The problem is I don't know what semaphores, mutex
On 5/7/05, Jon Drews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/7/05, Chris Hodgins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If you are interested in Unix and FreeBSD this is a good choice:
> >
> > http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/tg/stores/detail/-/books/0201702452/reviews/026-9762435-1924466
> >
>
> Thank you
Jon Drews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 5/7/05, Chris Hodgins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If you are interested in Unix and FreeBSD this is a good choice:
> >
[McKusick/Neville-Neil,"The Design and Implementation of the FreeBSD
Operating System", ISBN 0201702452]
> Thank you Chris:
>
>
Thank you for you help - I misunderstood the firewall_script and
firewall_type. Everything works well now. Just one annoying problem. I
continually get a mail msg regarding firewall_enabled not found:
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 7 12:44:00 2005
Date: Sat, 7 May 2005 12:44:00 -0400 (EDT)
From:
On Saturday 07 May 2005 14:16, Colin Worthy wrote:
> I am having an odd issue with setting the correct timezone in KDE. I have
> set the correct timezone from the command line and it seems to stay for a
> while, but eventually is reverting to UTC time. I should be in Central
> Daylight time (Amer
Chris writes:
> ... in order for someone to "claim" a violation of copyright, it MUST
> be registered with the copyright office (at least here in the States).
For civil procedures involving works of U.S. origin, yes. But you don't
have to register way in advance, you only have to register before
Chris Hodgins writes:
> This keeps coming up time and time again. Why don't we simply put up
> a message on the subscription page that says if you subscribe you
> agree that your messages will be archived for public viewing. End of
> story. No more bitchy emails on this subject, no more heated
Anthony Atkielski wrote:
> Chris writes:
>
>
>>... in order for someone to "claim" a violation of copyright, it MUST
>>be registered with the copyright office (at least here in the States).
>
>
> For civil procedures involving works of U.S. origin, yes. But you don't
> have to register way in a
Bart Silverstrim writes:
> Dilemma...how do I get permission to quote you to reply to you?
You can e-mail me and ask. However, backquoting of portions of a
message generally falls within the scope of fair use, IMO (IANAL).
--
Anthony
___
freebsd-qu
Anthony Atkielski wrote:
> Bart Silverstrim writes:
>
>
>>Dilemma...how do I get permission to quote you to reply to you?
>
>
> You can e-mail me and ask. However, backquoting of portions of a
> message generally falls within the scope of fair use, IMO (IANAL).
>
If thats what it comes down
Anthony Atkielski wrote:
> Bart Silverstrim writes:
>
>
>>Dilemma...how do I get permission to quote you to reply to you?
>
>
> You can e-mail me and ask. However, backquoting of portions of a
> message generally falls within the scope of fair use, IMO (IANAL).
>
Here - let's do this.
Nobod
Chris wrote:
>Nobody can reply to, reproduce, referance, show, etc. this email without
>written consent be my.
>
>
The courts, wisely, have declined to say quoting a set amount is ok or
define any other bright line test.
Since there is no "bright line" test for fair use it comes down to is i
> On 5/7/05, Jon Drews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi:
>>
>> I was thinking of getting one of these two books. I want to learn
>> more about how UNIX and in particular, FreeBSD work. Has anyone read
>> either of these books?
>>
>> UNIX Internals: The New Frontiers
>> by Uresh Vahalia
I have
regisr a écrit :
I am looking for a FAQ about dynamic devices:
In 5.3 (and 5.4..) SCSI devices nodes (/dev/pass*) are created when
discovered (at boot or when running "camcontrol rescan ... " )
How to change the permissions on the /dev/pass* ? (not manualy of
course ;-)
OK, I can wrote a shell for
Chris writes:
> If thats what it comes down to - then sending emails, lists, bloggs, etc
> are all willfull violations of copyright - Oh no - where do you
> draw the line!!!
Some are, some aren't.
--
Anthony
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mai
Anthony Atkielski wrote:
> Chris writes:
>
>
>>If thats what it comes down to - then sending emails, lists, bloggs, etc
>>are all willfull violations of copyright - Oh no - where do you
>>draw the line!!!
>
>
> Some are, some aren't.
>
This whole thing is silly (the isues at hand, meaning
I'm experimenting with groff macros and I've placed '.B some text' into a
file. I don't know what command line options to get groff to spit it out as
bold text.
I've tried groff -man -T ascii filename | more
but it just swallows the text. I've read many man pages but I'm not getting a
thread
On page http://wolfram.schneider.org/bsd/7thEdManVol2/
there is a paper about LEARN -- Computer-Aided Instruction on UNIX
Does anyone know if this program is available?
--
i386 FreeBSD 4.11-STABLE
There are 10 types of people in this world. Ones that understand binary and
then, the others.
__
On 2005-05-07 16:03, Steven Friedrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm experimenting with groff macros and I've placed '.B some text'
> into a file. I don't know what command line options to get groff to
> spit it out as bold text.
>
> I've tried groff -man -T ascii filename | more
>
> but it just
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Chris
> Sent: Saturday, May 07, 2005 11:46 AM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Mailinglist privacy: MY NAME ALL OVER GOOGLE!
>
>
> Anthony Atkielski wrote:
> > Chris writes:
> >
> >
> >>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Fafa Hafiz
> Krantz
> Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 3:40 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Mailinglist privacy: MY NAME ALL OVER GOOGLE!
>
>
>
> Hello.
>
> I hav
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Fafa Hafiz
>>Krantz
>>Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 3:40 AM
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: Mailinglist privacy: MY NAME ALL OVER GOOGLE!
>>
Chris, I'm surprised at you! Why did you pass up the opportunity to
forge
Fafa's name as the sender, to illustrate the point to the
clueless better. ;-)
Oh dear, I guess I'm gonna get sued for identity theft!! ;-)
Ted, forging Fafa.
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PRO
On 5/8/05, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Anthony Atkielski wrote:
>
OK, this is arguably Anthony's best-ever troll, and ranks pretty highly when
compared to past list trolling.
Could someone give the man an award for his achievements and then let's kill
this useless mega-thread.
On Sat 7 May 05 10:39, Anthony Atkielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> For those of us with ethics and conscience, registration is
> irrelevant. We do not refrain from infringement out of fear of
> prosecution, we refrain because infringement is wrong.
Where is the infringement here?
Have you sp
Joshua Tinnin writes:
> Where is the infringement here?
Reproducing a copyrighted work without permission.
> Have you spoken to an actual lawyer about this issue? I have. Guess what
> he said?
I prefer not to guess. Invite him here.
In any case, lawyers don't decide what is or isn't infringem
On Sat 7 May 05 15:01, Anthony Atkielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Joshua Tinnin writes:
> > Where is the infringement here?
>
> Reproducing a copyrighted work without permission.
Then so is every single tech help list with public archives. Or every
single email list with public archives. I'm
Joshua Tinnin wrote:
> On Sat 7 May 05 15:01, Anthony Atkielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>>Joshua Tinnin writes:
... Snip
> I hate to bring up the old cliche ... but, seriously, Anthony, most of
> what you do here is spread:
>
> Fear
> Uncertainty
> Doubt
Oh no!!!
Fear?
Uncertainty?
D
On Saturday 07 May 2005 17:30, Jon Drews wrote:
> On 5/7/05, Chris Hodgins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If you are interested in Unix and FreeBSD this is a good choice:
> >
> > http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/tg/stores/detail/-/books/0201702452/r
> >eviews/026-9762435-1924466
>
> Thank you C
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 06:10:45PM +0100, RW wrote:
> On Saturday 07 May 2005 14:16, Colin Worthy wrote:
> > I am having an odd issue with setting the correct timezone in KDE. I have
> > set the correct timezone from the command line and it seems to stay for a
> > while, but eventually is revertin
Joshua Tinnin writes:
> Then so is every single tech help list with public archives.
Yes. The fact that certain infringing actions may take place with great
frequency does not make them any less infringing.
> Some of them have been in existence before the web. I can't figure out
> why you keep
On Sat 7 May 05 15:35, Anthony Atkielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Joshua Tinnin writes:
> > I hate to bring up the old cliche ... but, seriously, Anthony, most
> > of what you do here is spread:
> >
> > Fear
> > Uncertainty
> > Doubt
>
> Much of the prudence that lawful behavior demands is ba
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 04:05:09PM +0100, Chris Hodgins wrote:
> This keeps coming up time and time again. Why don't we simply put up
> a message on the subscription page that says if you subscribe you
> agree that your messages will be archived for public viewing. End of
> story. No more bitchy
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 01:32:37PM +0200, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
> Alex de Kruijff writes:
>
> > So? As long as your system is protected by a password nobody has a legal
> > defence.
>
> Unfortunately they do. For example, if they guess a user name and
> password and it works, they can enter y
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 11:16:02AM -0400, Bart Silverstrim wrote:
>
> On May 6, 2005, at 2:43 PM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
>
> >Roland Smith writes:
> >
> >>On the page where you subscribe to a mailing list there is a link to
> >>the
> >>list archives. The existance to this link implies a public
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 05:56:16AM -0500, Fafa Hafiz Krantz wrote:
>
> Hello Alex (and Jan)!
>
> > It could be that type slave files need to go in the subdirectory slave
> > and type master files need to go in the subdirectory master.
>
> named doesn't give me any errors.
> As I previously state
Hi all,
I can't seem to get a buildworld to complete without errors. I
_just_ went from 4.11 to 5.4 using sources. The buildworld then also had
errors. The errors are below, as well as a locate for the missing
libraries. If you go into the directory for
/usr/local/libexec/mail.local and do m
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 10:38:04AM +0200, Marc Fonvieille wrote:
> On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 02:49:23AM +0200, Alex de Kruijff wrote:
> > >
> > > Well, the "Mailing lists" link on http://www.FreeBSD.org/ homepage
> > > points on
> > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/eresour
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 08:05:34PM -0400, Brian Wolman wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>I can't seem to get a buildworld to complete without errors. I
> _just_ went from 4.11 to 5.4 using sources. The buildworld then also had
> errors. The errors are below, as well as a locate for the missing
> librarie
On May 7, 2005, at 1:53 PM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Bart Silverstrim writes:
Dilemma...how do I get permission to quote you to reply to you?
You can e-mail me and ask. However, backquoting of portions of a
message generally falls within the scope of fair use, IMO (IANAL).
Nope, because that assum
On Sat, 07 May 2005 06:05:56 -0500
"Fafa Hafiz Krantz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hey!
>
> > I personally find the old methode a lot easier to read, compared
> > to the new one. If a change is wanted, why not make such a thing
> > like this a kernel option?
>
> Are you referring to the inde
On May 7, 2005, at 6:18 PM, Chris wrote:
Oh no!!!
Fear?
Uncertainty?
Doubt?
I guess OpenSource isnt the way to go. I guess FreeBSD isnt right for
me.
Oh no - Look at all this termoil...
I guess I should just buy the Microsoft product so I won't violate
anything. Surely becasue if I pay for it - e
Bart Silverstrim wrote:
>
> On May 7, 2005, at 6:18 PM, Chris wrote:
>
>> Oh no!!!
>>
>> Fear?
>> Uncertainty?
>> Doubt?
>>
>> I guess OpenSource isnt the way to go. I guess FreeBSD isnt right for me.
>>
>> Oh no - Look at all this termoil...
>>
>> I guess I should just buy the Microsoft product
On May 7, 2005, at 6:35 PM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Joshua Tinnin writes:
Then so is every single tech help list with public archives.
Yes. The fact that certain infringing actions may take place with
great
frequency does not make them any less infringing.
Fine. Take them each to court. See ho
On May 7, 2005, at 10:44 PM, Chris wrote:
Aaaarrggghhg
Isn't anyhing sacred anymore?!
Oh how I long for the Dos-dayz.
Whoa is mee
...licensed too. Sorry. You don't own it.
:-p
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/m
Twas said by " Bart Silverstrim" and my ignorance encourages me to join
the dialogue and say hey guys can this one be droppd -- my mail box is
getting overstuffed with this and it is now way off topic
Thanks
D
David Southwell Ham call sign M0TAU
Remove nospamme_ from reply
I've installed a WinTV PVR 150MCE card in my Dell 4550, which has been running
FreeBSD 5.3 for many months, and would like to try it with fxtv or
gnomemeeting.
Since I'm using a custom kernel which was built without bktr support, I've
added
the following to loader.conf (from a read of the bktr
I really must say that Fafa is a useless troll.
He requests his name not be on any mailing lists, yet acknowledges
that it infact isn't even his/her name, and continues to mail the
lists.
Topposting hurray.
On 5/7/05, Fafa Hafiz Krantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I recall hearing of an ann
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Alex
> de Kruijff
> Sent: Saturday, May 07, 2005 4:08 PM
> To: Chris Hodgins
> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Mailinglist privacy: MY NAME ALL OVER GOOGLE!
>
>
> On Sat, May 07, 2005 at
93 matches
Mail list logo
