Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
[dd]
>
> NO_BACKUP means don't create a temporary package when deleting
> something. This is unsuitable for me as /usr/ports in my network is
> distributed via NFS ro.
I also share /usr/ports via NFS ro, but I have defined
PACKAGES=/var/tmp/packages in portmaster.rc t
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 03:49:05PM +0700, Victor Sudakov wrote:
> > Generally I like to run 'portsnap fetch update' followed by 'portmaster -ai'
> > (after reading /usr/ports/UPDATING) every week. This keeps the number of
> > huge
> > compilefests (like gettext updates :-() to a minimum.
>
> Has
Victor Sudakov wrote:
If portaudit shows that some installed packages have vulnerabilities,
what do you usually do?
Greatly depend on where am I. All my systems are staying up-to-date
whereas when I'm visiting someones system I prefer to update only
required pieces of software. Anyway if you te
Roland Smith wrote:
> >
> > If portaudit shows that some installed packages have vulnerabilities,
> > what do you usually do?
>
> It depends on the vulnerability and what the package does. I will de-install
> it if I think that the vulnerability is critical for me and there is no
> workaround.
>
Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
> >
> > If portaudit shows that some installed packages have vulnerabilities,
> > what do you usually do?
>
> Greatly depend on where am I. All my systems are staying up-to-date
> whereas when I'm visiting someones system I prefer to update only
> required pieces of sof
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 05:32:33PM +0700, Victor Sudakov wrote:
> Hello portmaster users,
>
> If portaudit shows that some installed packages have vulnerabilities,
> what do you usually do?
It depends on the vulnerability and what the package does. I will de-install
it if I think that the vulnera
On 23 January 2012 05:32, Victor Sudakov wrote:
> Hello portmaster users,
>
> If portaudit shows that some installed packages have vulnerabilities,
> what do you usually do?
>
> Do you upgrade only the vulnerable packages, or vulnerable packages
> and dependent packages (portmaster -r), or perhaps
Victor Sudakov wrote:
Hello portmaster users,
If portaudit shows that some installed packages have vulnerabilities,
what do you usually do?
Greatly depend on where am I. All my systems are staying up-to-date
whereas when I'm visiting someones system I prefer to update only
required pieces of
Hello portmaster users,
If portaudit shows that some installed packages have vulnerabilities,
what do you usually do?
Do you upgrade only the vulnerable packages, or vulnerable packages
and dependent packages (portmaster -r), or perhaps all packages
(portmaster -a)? Or do you "pkg_delete -a" all