on that program being
> rebuilt.
And what about libs it may have left behind and other ports picking up
faulty info? Then you build unsupported and faultly packages and complain
to the list when something doesn't work. Just follow /usr/ports/UPDATING
as advised instead of your "shortcu
rts was when I installed 9.0,
> > and I used the portmaster 'nuke all ports' method I was trying to
> > day. Since then, several dozen ports of been 'deleted' or 'renamed',
> > not just the linux_base-fc4. Seems in the case of ports which have
> > be
ng and dependencies? Portupgrade will do this if you tell it. Try it
> out and see what fun you can create.
>
Not a single program on my system depended on that program being
rebuilt. Portmaster should certainly refuse to rebuild anything that
did, of course.
__
On Mon, 14 Oct 2013, Scott Ballantyne wrote:
On Mon, 14 oct 2013, Warren Block wrote:
On Mon, 14 Oct 2013, Scott Ballantyne wrote:
What errors, exactly?
Well, for example:
portmaster -Faf
it starts to fetch a bunch of files
it finds a port which has been deleted, such as
linux-base-fc4
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 6:35 PM, Scott Ballantyne wrote:
>
>
> I understand why portmaster quits that port.
Because it has no choice.
> It does seem like a bit
> of over-kill to quit updating ALL ports because one is long
> gone. Seems like it could do the others.
>
So
On Mon, 14 oct 2013, Warren Block wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Oct 2013, Scott Ballantyne wrote:
>
> >>
> >> What errors, exactly?
> >
> > Well, for example:
> >
> > portmaster -Faf
> > it starts to fetch a bunch of files
> > it finds a port w
On Mon, 14 Oct 2013, Scott Ballantyne wrote:
I'm following the recipe at the end of man portmaster for deleting and
reinstalling all my ports, which I have done many times in the
past. This time, I am getting errors on the portmaster -Faf step
involving deleted ports, and I'm not s
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm following the recipe at the end of man portmaster for deleting and
> > reinstalling all my ports, which I have done many times in the
> > past. This time, I am getting errors on the portmaster -Faf step
> > involving deleted p
On Sun, 13 Oct 2013, Scott Ballantyne wrote:
Hi,
I'm following the recipe at the end of man portmaster for deleting and
reinstalling all my ports, which I have done many times in the
past. This time, I am getting errors on the portmaster -Faf step
involving deleted ports, and I'm no
Hi,
I'm following the recipe at the end of man portmaster for deleting and
reinstalling all my ports, which I have done many times in the
past. This time, I am getting errors on the portmaster -Faf step
involving deleted ports, and I'm not sure how to deal with this
easily. If the po
exlive-scheme-full; removed it, but then
>> run portmaster -R pixman, and portmaster -r pixman and the running of
>> it stops with message that !#/bin/sh .. argument too long and comes up
>> with texlive-?-?-_1 or similar. Have not been successful in
>> fixing th
On Thu, 3 Oct 2013, Antonio Olivares wrote:
Have tried that, but it rebuilds pixman, but then X bombs out blurting
out messages that libpixman.so is missing :(
I have tried to remove print/texlive-scheme-full; removed it, but then
run portmaster -R pixman, and portmaster -r pixman and the
On 10/03/2013 20:28, Antonio Olivares wrote:
> Have tried that, but it rebuilds pixman, but then X bombs out blurting
> out messages that libpixman.so is missing :(
>
> I have tried to remove print/texlive-scheme-full; removed it, but then
> run portmaster -R pixman, and portm
but it does not work :(
>> I get
>>
>> Could not execute shell
>> "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk", line 1192: warning "/usr/bin/awk
>> '/^#define[[:blank:]]FreeBSD_version/ {print $3}
>> > /usr/local/sbin/portmaster: rm: Argument list
"/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk", line 1192: warning "/usr/bin/awk
> '/^#define[[:blank:]]FreeBSD_version/ {print $3}
> /usr/local/sbin/portmaster: rm: Argument list too long
>
> and it justs sits there. Out of 3 machines only 1 is working because
> I overlooked the
AUTHOR: zeis...@freebsd.org
>>
>> The library version of x11/pixman has changed, and portrevision has
>> been bumped in all dependent ports. If you have external software that
>> depends on pixman, this software needs to be recompiled.
>> To recompile all
bumped in all dependent ports. If you have external software that
> depends on pixman, this software needs to be recompiled.
> To recompile all software dependent on pixman, run:
>
> # portmaster -r pixman
> or
> # portupgrade -rf pixman
>
> The messages are th
depends on pixman, this software needs to be recompiled.
To recompile all software dependent on pixman, run:
# portmaster -r pixman
or
# portupgrade -rf pixman
The messages are that a pkg texlive-ub* and that #!/bin/sh list
too long. I try to run
# portmaster -d -r pixman -x 'te
On 05/12/2013 12:37 AM, Leslie Jensen wrote:
>
>
> I do some work on remote machines and sometimes I have a need to execute
> additional commands after for example a portmaster -a command.
>
> Normally I use the "&&" to separate commands but this does not
I do some work on remote machines and sometimes I have a need to execute
additional commands after for example a portmaster -a command.
Normally I use the "&&" to separate commands but this does not work when
portmaster displays pkg-messages.
I cannot see in the portm
- Original Message -
> From: Jerry
> To: FreeBSD
> Cc:
> Sent: Thursday, 9 May 2013 5:15 PM
> Subject: Re: Typo in portmaster man page?
>
> On Thu, 09 May 2013 06:06:42 -0500
> Bryan Drewery articulated:
>
>> (I'm not the original author
On Thu, 09 May 2013 06:06:42 -0500
Bryan Drewery articulated:
> (I'm not the original author on portmaster). Personally the manpage
> really confuses me. There's been bigger issues to tackle first though
> so I have not touched the manpage much.
You do realize that the "
On 5/9/2013 3:25 AM, Leslie Jensen wrote:
>
> When reading the portmaster man page I just came to wonder if this isn't
> a typo?
>
>
> [--force-config|-G] [-aftv] -F
> fetch distfiles only
>
>
>
> Shouldn't the -F be to the far left?
&g
When reading the portmaster man page I just came to wonder if this isn't
a typo?
[--force-config|-G] [-aftv] -F
fetch distfiles only
Shouldn't the -F be to the far left?
Thanks
/Leslie
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org ma
I'm specifically thinking of the directories that has to be emptied or
deleted.
Thanks
/Leslie
Using portmaster to do a complete reinstallation of all your ports:
1. portmaster --list-origins > ~/instal
On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 16:34:24 -0400, Jerry wrote:
> Does portmaster have a "--noexecute" flag like portupgrade?
> Specifically, I want to run the following command and see exactly what
> would be updated / modified sans actually doing it.
>
> portmaster -o new_app
Does portmaster have a "--noexecute" flag like portupgrade?
Specifically, I want to run the following command and see exactly what
would be updated / modified sans actually doing it.
portmaster -o new_app old_app
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list repl
On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 09:53:00 -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> Aryeh Friedman writes:
>
>> How do I tell portmaster -ad to ignore certain ports because they are
>> broken such as editors/libreoffice is currently marked as (I am sure
>> this will change soon)
>
> Yo
Aryeh Friedman writes:
> How do I tell portmaster -ad to ignore certain ports because they are
> broken such as editors/libreoffice is currently marked as (I am sure this
> will change soon)
Your direct question was already answered, but note that libreoffice is
not broken overall,
How do I tell portmaster -ad to ignore certain ports because they are
broken such as editors/libreoffice is currently marked as (I am sure
this
will change soon)
-x avoid building or updating ports that match this pattern. Can be
specified more than once
2013-03-25 10:40, Aryeh Friedman skrev:
How do I tell portmaster -ad to ignore certain ports because they are
broken such as editors/libreoffice is currently marked as (I am sure this
will change soon)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On 03/25/2013 10:40, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
How do I tell portmaster -ad to ignore certain ports because they are
broken such as editors/libreoffice is currently marked as (I am sure this
will change soon)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Just use -x switch
portmaster -ad -x libreoffice
2013/3/25 Aryeh Friedman :
> How do I tell portmaster -ad to ignore certain ports because they are
> broken such as editors/libreoffice is currently marked as (I am sure this
> will ch
How do I tell portmaster -ad to ignore certain ports because they are
broken such as editors/libreoffice is currently marked as (I am sure this
will change soon)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
On 9 February 2013 05:45, Mike Clarke wrote:
>
> I started off portmaster on a massive update on Thursday evening. Everything
> started off OK and I kept responding to all the make config screens until they
> were all finished and the compilation was well underway then went to bed a
I started off portmaster on a massive update on Thursday evening. Everything
started off OK and I kept responding to all the make config screens until they
were all finished and the compilation was well underway then went to bed and
left it to get on with it.
The next morning I discovered
py-bittornado-core port. I do not need it. So I have deleted it:
# pkg_info | grep bittornado
#
Clearly, it is not installed. However, when I write in this command:
# portmaster -a
Then I get this error:
===>>> The net-p2p/py-bittornado-core port has been deleted: Has
expired: D
When running portmaster -d -w -r pcre because of the upgrade from
pcre-8.31 to pcre-8.32 I encountered the following inconveniences:
Upgrade to hal-0.5.14_20 failed with the message it needs intltool >
0.40 which was installed at the time. First upgrading to intltool-0.41.1
solved t
it. So I have deleted it:
# pkg_info | grep bittornado
#
Clearly, it is not installed. However, when I write in this command:
# portmaster -a
Then I get this error:
===>>> The net-p2p/py-bittornado-core port has been deleted: Has
expired: Depends on the deprecated wx 2.4
===>
uki gmail.com> writes:
>
> But theese are different packages (different names). since ports dont have
> any equivalent of debian "provides" flag it is impossible to figure it out
> in a safe way.
I have never built a port/package, so I could be wrong here.
This paragraph seems to contain means
re were two libxul ports:
> /usr/ports/www/libxul
> /usr/ports/www/libxul19
> of which the last one was installed:
> /var/db/pkg/libxul-1.9.2.28_1/
>
> There was a port to update which died on error:
> # portmaster icedtea-web
> ...
> ===>>> The depende
Hi,
I hit a problem today during a system update.
There were two libxul ports:
/usr/ports/www/libxul
/usr/ports/www/libxul19
of which the last one was installed:
/var/db/pkg/libxul-1.9.2.28_1/
There was a port to update which died on error:
# portmaster icedtea-web
...
===>>> The depen
jb gmail.com> writes:
> ...
I have doubts about these options use, so I filed a PR#:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=172651
jb
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To u
Polytropon edvax.de> writes:
> ...
> But this?
>
> # portmaster -L --index | egrep '(ew|ort) version|total install'
> /tmp/d-87852-index/INDEX-9.bz2100% of 1619 kB 125 kBps
> 00m00s
> Terminated
>
> This is with --index and _no_ po
> > ...
>
> # ls -al /usr/ports/
> ...
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 26881412 Oct 12 07:47 INDEX-7
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 26765446 Oct 12 07:47 INDEX-8
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 26715339 Oct 12 13:28 INDEX-9
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1658547 O
6 Oct 12 07:47 INDEX-8
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 26715339 Oct 12 13:28 INDEX-9
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1658547 Oct 12 12:01 INDEX-9.bz2
...
#
# find /tmp -name "*INDEX*"
# portmaster -L --index-only | egrep '(ew|ort) version|total install'
===>>> Ne
On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 04:35:43 + (UTC)
jb wrote:
> Hi,
> what is the diff between
> --index
> and
> --index-only
>From a *very* quick look, it appears that --index-only means don't use
the the port-directory at all, so that the index file is downloaded
into /tmp, and some checks and optimizatio
Polytropon edvax.de> writes:
> ...
> > Well, yes, BUT they seem to be redundant (that's why I asked).
> >
> > # portmaster -L --index-only | egrep '(ew|ort) version|total install'
> > ===>>> New version available: smartmontools-5.43_1
nt the -PP|--packages-only option is required.
> > See
> > the ENVIRONMENT section below for additional requirements.
> >
> > This means --index-only is to be used when using portmaster for
> > binary installs without an installed ports collection.
&g
ages-only option is required.
>>> See the ENVIRONMENT section below for additional requirements.
>>>
>> ...
> And -PP|--packages-only option implies "index only" entry behavior, so there
> is redundancy here as well.
>
> Does anybody know where this --i
jb gmail.com> writes:
> ...
> > --index-only
> > do not try to use /usr/ports. For updating ports when no
> > /usr/ports
> > directory is present the -PP|--packages-only option is required.
> > See the ENVIRONMENT section below for additional requirem
date
> ...
> --index-only
> do not try to use /usr/ports. For updating ports when no /usr/ports
> directory is present the -PP|--packages-only option is required. See
> the ENVIRONMENT section below for additional requirements.
>
> This means -
On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 04:35:43 + (UTC), jb wrote:
> Hi,
> what is the diff between
> --index
> and
> --index-only
According to "man portmaster" there are some options that
control the behaviour regarding the use of INDEX:
--no-index-fetch
ski
Hi,
what is the diff between
--index
and
--index-only
jb
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Mon, 8 Oct 2012 16:18:20 + (UTC), jb wrote:
> Hi,
> what to do with that backup package (-b option) after installation of new port
> failed ?
Install it with pkg_add? :-)
--
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
_
Hi,
what to do with that backup package (-b option) after installation of new port
failed ?
jb
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions
s precise I can be without the exact terminology!).
>
>> An installation failed due to pkg(ng) was missing libarchive.so via
>> portmaster or via core dumping install(1). By installing on one box, my
>> home box, port security/cyrus-sasl2 manually, luckily install(1) and
>
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 09:44:40AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> >> An installation failed due to pkg(ng) was missing libarchive.so via
> >
> > There is pkg-static for recovering in this type of situation.
>
> Oh ... I'm new to pkg(ng).
>
No worries. It is a nice thing to know about, since afte
y, r239295 Wed August 15 17:04:51 CEST 2012
>> amd64, I had to recompile all requirements of port Apache22, since after
>> the port update it core dumped.
>>
>> On FreeBSD 9.1-PRE, with pkg(ng), things went well. Recompilation and
>> installation of all "portmaste
; SIGNAL 11. Booting into multiuser mode is impossible, login core dumps
> SIGNAL 11, many other daemons, too. The only way is to boot into single
> user mode.
I'm not drawing a correlation between this and unrelated coredumping processes.
> An installation failed due to pkg(ng) was m
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 11:33 AM, O. Hartmann
wrote:
> I ran into a very delicate and nasty situation.
Please don't cross-post / double-post.
Thanks,
-Garrett
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/f
FreeBSD 9.1-PRE, with pkg(ng), things went well. Recompilation and
installation of all "portmaster -f apache-2.2" requirements went perfect.
On both FreeBSD 10-CURRENT boxes it ended up in a mess, all of a
sudden(!), while reinstalling port security/cyrus-sasl2, things started
to fail in
On 8/16/2012 10:33 AM, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> I tried to find rescue images and a rescue DVD of a snap shot server,
> but there is no way to crawl through the informations on the web pages
> towards a snapshot. All folders end up in 2011 and highly outdated
> (www.freebsd.org, I didn't look at mirro
d to recompile all requirements of port Apache22, since after
> the port update it core dumped.
>
> On FreeBSD 9.1-PRE, with pkg(ng), things went well. Recompilation and
> installation of all "portmaster -f apache-2.2" requirements went perfect.
>
> On both FreeBSD 10
FreeBSD 9.1-PRE, with pkg(ng), things went well. Recompilation and
installation of all "portmaster -f apache-2.2" requirements went perfect.
On both FreeBSD 10-CURRENT boxes it ended up in a mess, all of a
sudden(!), while reinstalling port security/cyrus-sasl2, things started
to
On 03/07/2012 13:06, Bas Smeelen wrote:
> On 07/03/2012 12:29 PM, Jakub Lach wrote:
>> What option do I need to specify with -y to automatically answer those?
> -d
Add this to ${LOCALBASE}/etc/portmaster.rc
ALWAYS_SCRUB_DISTFILES=dopt
if that's something you're going to be doing all the time.
Now I see that I even used -d in my own portupdating
wrapper, but forgot about it and it's meaning, embarrassing.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/portmaster-embarrassingly-simple-question-y-option-tp5723878p5723918.html
Sent from the freebsd-ques
Excellent, I knew I was missing something simple.
Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/portmaster-embarrassingly-simple-question-y-option-tp5723878p5723916.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com
; >
> > ===>>> Delete unzip60.tar.gz? y/n [n]
> >
> > What option do I need to specify with -y to automatically answer those?
> >
> > I've tried --clean-distfiles, --clean-packages but it's not it.
> >
> > It usually happens when doing por
on of archivers/unzip (unzip-6.0_1) succeeded
===>>> Delete unzip60.tar.gz? y/n [n]
What option do I need to specify with -y to automatically answer those?
Hi
-d
I've tried --clean-distfiles, --clean-packages but it's not it.
It usually happens when doing portmaster --packages-bui
e?
>
> I've tried --clean-distfiles, --clean-packages but it's not it.
>
> It usually happens when doing portmaster --packages-build
> --delete-build-only
> build.
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/portmas
;>> Delete unzip60.tar.gz? y/n [n]
What option do I need to specify with -y to automatically answer those?
I've tried --clean-distfiles, --clean-packages but it's not it.
It usually happens when doing portmaster --packages-build
--delete-build-only
build.
--
View this mess
re sanitized for your protection
Index: portmaster
=======
--- portmaster (revision 236697)
+++ portmaster (working copy)
@@ -2208,6 +2208,8 @@
}
term_printf () {
+ case "$1" in *\>\>*) echo -e "\n\t${P
at was already there.
Let me know what you think,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Index: portmaster
===
--- portmaster (revision 236697)
+++ portmaster (working copy)
@@ -2208,6 +2208,8 @@
}
term_
On Wed, 6 Jun 2012, Leslie Jensen wrote:
Can the reason for me not getting the title to change be that I very often
use screen when updating ports?
Sure, the escape codes are interpreted by screen, not Terminal. There
may be a way to pass them through. tmux has some options for that, but
I
2012-06-04 16:10, Leslie Jensen skrev:
2012-06-04 15:54, Warren Block skrev:
% printf "\033];Funny Title\007"
Works!
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send
2012-06-04 15:54, Warren Block skrev:
% printf "\033];Funny Title\007"
Works!
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...
n and
maybe it's because of that I cannot see any title?
Nope. Should work just fine for you, I've done thousands of portmaster
upgrades over ssh.
I've set that dynamic title should go before initial title. I've also tried
the setting that it should replace initial title. None
n and
maybe it's because of that I cannot see any title?
Nope. Should work just fine for you, I've done thousands of portmaster
upgrades over ssh.
Let me know how it goes,
Doug
I've set that dynamic title should go before initial title. I've also
tried the setting that it sho
ot see any title?
Nope. Should work just fine for you, I've done thousands of portmaster
upgrades over ssh.
Let me know how it goes,
Doug
I've set that dynamic title should go before initial title. I've also
tried the setting that it should replace initial title. None of the
work just fine for you, I've done thousands of portmaster
upgrades over ssh.
Let me know how it goes,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listi
2012-06-03 18:18, Warren Block skrev:
On Sun, 3 Jun 2012, Warren Block wrote:
On Sun, 3 Jun 2012, Leslie Jensen wrote:
2012-06-02 19:18, Doug Barton skrev:
On 6/2/2012 8:09 AM, Leslie Jensen wrote:
I'm thinking about some kind of information on the build progress
Portmaster al
On Sun, 3 Jun 2012, Warren Block wrote:
On Sun, 3 Jun 2012, Leslie Jensen wrote:
2012-06-02 19:18, Doug Barton skrev:
On 6/2/2012 8:09 AM, Leslie Jensen wrote:
I'm thinking about some kind of information on the build progress
Portmaster already has that if you're building in
On Sun, 3 Jun 2012, Leslie Jensen wrote:
2012-06-02 19:18, Doug Barton skrev:
On 6/2/2012 8:09 AM, Leslie Jensen wrote:
I'm thinking about some kind of information on the build progress
Portmaster already has that if you're building in a terminal window,
look in the titlebar. I
2012-06-02 19:18, Doug Barton skrev:
On 6/2/2012 8:09 AM, Leslie Jensen wrote:
I'm thinking about some kind of information on the build progress
Portmaster already has that if you're building in a terminal window,
look in the titlebar. I can take a look at printing that in line
On 6/2/2012 8:09 AM, Leslie Jensen wrote:
> I'm thinking about some kind of information on the build progress
Portmaster already has that if you're building in a terminal window,
look in the titlebar. I can take a look at printing that in line if
you're not in a terminal window
I'm thinking about some kind of information on the build progress when
one does larger updates like the newly recommendation in
/usr/ports/UPDATING
portmaster -r png-
I myself have three machines with different capacity when it comes to
building ports.
How about a knobb one could c
On 28 May 2012 14:12, Silvio Siefke wrote:
> Hello,
>
> is there a chance that portmaster can be only fetch all Source which need
> update?
> I mean make fetch-recursiv has helped in the ports collection, when i think
> right,
> but can portmaster that with all pack
On Mon, 28 May 2012 23:12:31 +0200, Silvio Siefke wrote:
> Hello,
>
> is there a chance that portmaster can be only fetch all Source which need
> update?
> I mean make fetch-recursiv has helped in the ports collection, when i think
> right,
> but can portmaster that with a
Hello,
is there a chance that portmaster can be only fetch all Source which need
update?
I mean make fetch-recursiv has helped in the ports collection, when i think
right,
but can portmaster that with all packages they need update?
Thanks for help.
Regards
Silvio
--On May 8, 2012 10:51:16 PM +0100 Mike Clarke
wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 May 2012, John Webster wrote:
>
>> Would this work for you? From the manpage:
>>
>> For those who wish to be sure that specific ports are always
>> compiled instead of being installed from packages the
>> PT_NO_INSTA
On Tuesday 08 May 2012, John Webster wrote:
> Would this work for you? From the manpage:
>
> For those who wish to be sure that specific ports are always
> compiled instead of being installed from packages the
> PT_NO_INSTALL_PACKAGE vari- able can be defined in the make(1)
> environment, pe
--On May 8, 2012 9:33:59 PM +0100 Mike Clarke
wrote:
>
> I'm happy to use the -P option to let portmaster use packages for most
> of my ports but there's a few that must be compiled from the port
> instead because I need to configure non default options, e.g. to enable
I'm happy to use the -P option to let portmaster use packages for most
of my ports but there's a few that must be compiled from the port
instead because I need to configure non default options, e.g. to enable
GIMP plugin support in graphics/xsane
Is there any way of forcing por
On 02.05.2012 14:59, Warren Block wrote:
On Wed, 2 May 2012, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
On Wed, 2 May 2012 10:03:44 -0400
Robert Huff wrote:
Jorge Luis =?iso-8859-1?Q?Gonz=E1lez?= writes:
When I run:
portmaster -a --no-confirm
I get the error
Installing updates: chflags...///lib
On Wed, 2 May 2012, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
On Wed, 2 May 2012 10:03:44 -0400
Robert Huff wrote:
Jorge Luis =?iso-8859-1?Q?Gonz=E1lez?= writes:
When I run:
portmaster -a --no-confirm
I get the error
Installing updates: chflags...///lib/libc.so.7: Operation not
permitted
Changing
On Wed, 2 May 2012 10:03:44 -0400
Robert Huff wrote:
>
> Jorge Luis =?iso-8859-1?Q?Gonz=E1lez?= writes:
>
> > When I run:
> >
> > portmaster -a --no-confirm
> >
> > I get the error
> >
> > Installing updates: chflags...///lib/li
Jorge Luis =?iso-8859-1?Q?Gonz=E1lez?= writes:
> When I run:
>
> portmaster -a --no-confirm
>
> I get the error
>
> Installing updates: chflags...///lib/libc.so.7: Operation not permitted
>
> Changing chflags (presumably schg, but I tried the others) do
When I run:
portmaster -a --no-confirm
I get the error
Installing updates: chflags...///lib/libc.so.7: Operation not permitted
Changing chflags (presumably schg, but I tried the others) doesn't
appear to make any difference.
I'm not running any servers in jails.
Any idea
Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
[dd]
>
> NO_BACKUP means don't create a temporary package when deleting
> something. This is unsuitable for me as /usr/ports in my network is
> distributed via NFS ro.
I also share /usr/ports via NFS ro, but I have defined
PACKAGES=/var/tmp/packages in portmaster.rc t
1 - 100 of 328 matches
Mail list logo
