Hi,
Today I tried to build a new system/kernel for one of my boxes running
FreeBSD9.
make buildworld went ok, however during "make buildkernel" I got this:
-- < Cut here > --
/usr/src/sys/kern/subr_uio.c: In function &#
On Saturday April 2 2011 6:53:31 PM Tony wrote:
> Anybody care to have a look? http://pastie.org/1748851
I hate to ask, but before you started your buildworld, did you make clean?
Also, in case you did, another thing you might try is to add COMPAT_7. You
already have back to 4.
--
StevieRay
__
Hello!
Anybody care to have a look? http://pastie.org/1748851
Many thanks!
Tony
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@f
On Tue Sep 21 10, David DEMELIER wrote:
> 2010/9/21 Alexander Best :
> > On Fri Sep 17 10, David DEMELIER wrote:
> >> 2010/9/17 Alexander Best :
> >> > On Thu Sep 16 10, David DEMELIER wrote:
> >> >> Hi there,
> >> >>
> >> >
On Tue Sep 21 10, David DEMELIER wrote:
> 2010/9/21 Alexander Best :
> > On Fri Sep 17 10, David DEMELIER wrote:
> >> 2010/9/17 Alexander Best :
> >> > On Thu Sep 16 10, David DEMELIER wrote:
> >> >> Hi there,
> >> >>
> >> >
2010/9/21 Alexander Best :
> On Fri Sep 17 10, David DEMELIER wrote:
>> 2010/9/17 Alexander Best :
>> > On Thu Sep 16 10, David DEMELIER wrote:
>> >> Hi there,
>> >>
>> >> I can't understand why this part of make buildkernel is so long o
On Fri Sep 17 10, David DEMELIER wrote:
> 2010/9/17 Alexander Best :
> > On Thu Sep 16 10, David DEMELIER wrote:
> >> Hi there,
> >>
> >> I can't understand why this part of make buildkernel is so long on my
> >> amd64 machine (8.1-R)
>
2010/9/17 Alexander Best :
> On Thu Sep 16 10, David DEMELIER wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I can't understand why this part of make buildkernel is so long on my
>> amd64 machine (8.1-R)
>>
>> make -V CFILES -V SYSTEM_CFILES -V GEN_CFILES | MKDEP_CPP=&quo
On Thu Sep 16 10, David DEMELIER wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I can't understand why this part of make buildkernel is so long on my
> amd64 machine (8.1-R)
>
> make -V CFILES -V SYSTEM_CFILES -V GEN_CFILES | MKDEP_CPP="cc -E"
> CC="cc" xargs mkdep -a
Hi there,
I can't understand why this part of make buildkernel is so long on my
amd64 machine (8.1-R)
make -V CFILES -V SYSTEM_CFILES -V GEN_CFILES | MKDEP_CPP="cc -E"
CC="cc" xargs mkdep -a -f .newdep -O2 -frename-registers -pipe
-fno-strict-aliasing -std=c99 -Wall -
Is there a way to do "make buildkernel" one component at a
time? (A pointer to any relevant documentation would suffice.)
Robert Huff
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.o
--- On Sat, 10/4/08, Unga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm getting following compile error for
> /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/genassym.c :
> cc1: error: unrecognized command line option
> "-mno-align-long-strings"
> cc1: error: unrecognized command line option
> "-fformat-extensions"
> *** Error code 1
On Sat, Oct 04, 2008 at 02:17:50AM -0700, Unga wrote:
> I'm getting following compile error for /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/genassym.c :
> cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-mno-align-long-strings"
> cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-fformat-extensions"
> *** Error code 1
>
> I
Hi all
I'm getting following compile error for /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/genassym.c :
cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-mno-align-long-strings"
cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-fformat-extensions"
*** Error code 1
I'm using gcc version 4.3.1.
Does this means above options
Hello,
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, Harrison Peter CSA BIRKENHEAD wrote:
This is the message I usually see at the end of building world (ie.
following the command "make buildworld").
Are you sure you typed "make buildkernel"? Otherwise, that would explain
why you don't see
>Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 11:50:57 +0200 (CEST)
>From: Zbigniew Szalbot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: custom kernel, make buildkernel and then?
>To: Erik Norgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Con
Hello,
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, Spiros Papadopoulos wrote:
Hi,
What i simply do is:
1. Enter the /usr/src/sys/*/conf directory
2. copy GENERIC to whatever name i wish (no new dirs, no links)
3. Alter the file to my needs
4. cd /usr/src
5. make buildkernel KERNCONF='name'
6. make ins
Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, Erik Norgaard wrote:
The target directory for the build is /usr/obj, so in
/usr/obj/usr/src/sys you can see what kernels have been built.
And it seems none have? For I get this when I do ls I can see only boot
directory and no kernels. Is
Hello,
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, Erik Norgaard wrote:
The target directory for the build is /usr/obj, so in /usr/obj/usr/src/sys
you can see what kernels have been built.
And it seems none have? For I get this when I do ls I can see only boot
directory and no kernels. Is it possible that the buil
Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
I have in the past used supfile with ports-all option and couldn't build
a custom kernel. Yesterday it dawned on me that I need sources for that,
not ports. So I ran cvsup with src-all option. Now, I followed these steps:
# cd /usr/src/sys/i386/conf
# mkdir /root/kerne
Hi there again,
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Running 'cd /usr/src/sys/i386/conf && ls -l' yields...?
total 56
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel372 Oct 28 2005 DEFAULTS
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 10337 May 1 02:15 GENERIC
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1741 Jan 14 2005 GENERIC.hints
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>
>>> Easier just to go ln -s /root/kernel/LISTS /usr/src/sys/[arch]/conf/ .
>>>
>>> -Garrett
>> Err... omit that last period in the ln command. I just realized tha
Sorry, forgot to include the list
On 11/10/06, Spiros Papadopoulos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
What i simply do is:
1. Enter the /usr/src/sys/*/conf directory
2. copy GENERIC to whatever name i wish (no new dirs, no links)
3. Alter the file to my needs
4. cd /usr/src
5. make build
Hello again,
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Easier just to go ln -s /root/kernel/LISTS /usr/src/sys/[arch]/conf/ .
-Garrett
Err... omit that last period in the ln command. I just realized that could be
misleading.
Thank you Garrett - I did
ln -s /root/kernel/LISTS /usr/src/sys/i
Garrett Cooper wrote:
Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, Erik Norgaard wrote:
Yes, you can install the kernel. Applications don't live in
kernelspace. If your kernel fails to boot you can boot the old
kernel by in the loader menu go to a promt, unload the kernel and
load ke
edure 2 for building the kernel the new way.
# cd /usr/src
# make buildkernel KERNCONF=LISTS
It all went well without any complaint (I was really puzzled - when it
comes to IT, I usually see half-empty glasses...) but now I wonder. My
next step is supposed to be make installkernel KERNCONF=LISTS
Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, Erik Norgaard wrote:
Yes, you can install the kernel. Applications don't live in
kernelspace. If your kernel fails to boot you can boot the old kernel
by in the loader menu go to a promt, unload the kernel and load
kernel.old.
Now here co
Hello,
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, Erik Norgaard wrote:
Yes, you can install the kernel. Applications don't live in kernelspace. If
your kernel fails to boot you can boot the old kernel by in the loader menu
go to a promt, unload the kernel and load kernel.old.
Now here comes the funny part. When I
edure 2 for building the kernel the new way.
# cd /usr/src
# make buildkernel KERNCONF=LISTS
It all went well without any complaint (I was really puzzled - when it
comes to IT, I usually see half-empty glasses...) but now I wonder. My
next step is supposed to be make installkernel KERNCONF=LISTS
ernel the new way.
# cd /usr/src
# make buildkernel KERNCONF=LISTS
It all went well without any complaint (I was really puzzled - when it
comes to IT, I usually see half-empty glasses...) but now I wonder. My
next step is supposed to be make installkernel KERNCONF=LISTS
Is it OK to do it
Right John,
I follow your instructions and it's OK.
Thank you very much!!
>You have the umass device enabled which, as it says, requires scbus
>and da. Either remark the umass line or unremark the scbus and da
>lines in the SCSI peripherals section.
>
>Also, as you have the IN
On 6/21/06, Jordi Pavon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 2006-06-21 13:23, Jordi Pavon wrote:
> >
> > Hi, this is my first time I customize my kernel.
> >
> > I'm working with Freebsd 6.0, I made a make buildkernel
> >
"Jordi Pavon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The configuration File is attached, sorry for the Hotmail editor.
You have the umass device enabled which, as it says, requires scbus
and da. Either remark the umass line or unremark the scbus and da
lines in the SCSI peripherals section.
Also, as yo
>On 2006-06-21 13:23, Jordi Pavon wrote:
> >
> > Hi, this is my first time I customize my kernel.
> >
> > I'm working with Freebsd 6.0, I made a make buildkernel
> > KERNELCONF=ALBABRAIN, and I get this error:
> > "
On 2006-06-21 13:23, Jordi Pavon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi, this is my first time I customize my kernel.
>
> I'm working with Freebsd 6.0, I made a make buildkernel
> KERNELCONF=ALBABRAIN, and I get this error:
> "...
> cc -c -O -pipe -mc
Hi, this is my first time I customize my kernel.
I'm working with Freebsd 6.0, I made a make buildkernel
KERNELCONF=ALBABRAIN, and I get this error:
"...
cc -c -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -Wall -Wredundant-decls
-Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 06:41:41PM -0500, Luke Bartley wrote:
> I'm attempting to build a custom kernel, but when it comes time to build, it
> fails with this error:
>
> /usr/src/sys/dev/re/if_re.c:151:23: miibus_if.h: No such file or directory
>
> /usr/src/sys/pci/if_rl.c:125:23: miibus_if.h:
I'm attempting to build a custom kernel, but when it comes time to build, it
fails with this error:
/usr/src/sys/dev/re/if_re.c:151:23: miibus_if.h: No such file or directory
/usr/src/sys/pci/if_rl.c:125:23: miibus_if.h: No such file or directory
mkdep: compile failed
*** Error code 1
It may
Laurence Sanford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm upgrading a 5.4 machine to 6. I can buildworld successfully, but
> attempting to make buildkernel fails:
>
> HEADERS -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq -I@/../include -I/usr/include
> -I/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/Colossus
> /usr
I'm upgrading a 5.4 machine to 6. I can buildworld successfully, but
attempting to make buildkernel fails:
HEADERS -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq -I@/../include -I/usr/include
-I/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/Colossus /usr/src/sys/modules/ti/../../pci/if_ti.c
/usr/src/sys/modules/ti/../../pci/if_ti.c:25
On Tuesday 06 December 2005 12:27 am, Jose Borquez wrote:
> I am attempting to compile my custom kernel. I have just recently
> updated my source to interim build RELENG_5_4 I keep getting these
> errors when compiling the kernel. Could anybody please help and give
> me some clues as to what the
I am attempting to compile my custom kernel. I have just recently
updated my source to interim build RELENG_5_4 I keep getting these
errors when compiling the kernel. Could anybody please help and give me
some clues as to what the problem is here? I am also currently running
the IPF firewal
"Kiffin Gish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I get the following errors when trying to build a customized kernel:
You removed something required by something else.
In this case, I think the latter was:
device umass # Disks/Mass storage - Requires scbus and da
_
I get the following errors when trying to build a customized kernel:
-start-
[...]
touch hack.c
cc -shared -nostdlib hack.c -o hack.So
rm -f hack.c
MAKE=make sh /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh MYKERNEL
cc -c -O -pipe -march=athlon-xp -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs
-Wstrict-prototyp
make buildworld + make buildkernel
On 2005-09-13 10:32, "Middaugh, Bob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I was in the process of doing make buildworld, make buildkernel, etc...
> Make buildworld complete, but before I could do make buildkernel,
> etc... my machine shutdown - powe
On 2005-09-13 10:32, "Middaugh, Bob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was in the process of doing make buildworld, make buildkernel, etc...
> Make buildworld complete, but before I could do make buildkernel, etc... my
> machine shutdown - power outtage. My question i
Hi all,
I was in the process of doing make buildworld, make buildkernel, etc...
Make buildworld complete, but before I could do make buildkernel, etc... my
machine shutdown - power outtage. My question is, do I have to redo make
buildworld before I do make buildkernel or can I just turn my
usr/src/sys/sys/_null.h. Stop
*** Error code 2
Stop in /usr/src.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src.
Any thoughts?
On DecemberMonday 27 2004 17:06, you wrote:
> -- Forwarded Message --
>
> Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: make buildkernel
> Date: Monday 27 December
t;PFIL_HOOKS" redefined
[...]
> In an effort to update ( before I emailed youthe first time) I ran
> cvsup -g
> -L 2 www-supfile. Which worked I then ran make buildworld. Which worked just
> fine. I then toyed to run make buildkernel on my custom kernel which failed
> repeate
n I minimized it
it went away & full sizing the screen again wouldn't bring it back?)
In an effort to update ( before I emailed youthe first time) I ran
cvsup -g
-L 2 www-supfile. Which worked I then ran make buildworld. Which worked just
fine. I then toyed to run make build
On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 05:46:04PM -0600, shawley wrote:
> If you have the time or inclination I have a failed buildkernel
> stewart at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> thanks.
> From buildkernel print out
> In file included from /usr/src/sys/modules/ipfilter/../../contrib/ipfilter/
> netinet/ip_fil.c:10
If you have the time or inclination I have a failed buildkernel
stewart at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks.
From buildkernel print out
In file included from /usr/src/sys/modules/ipfilter/../../contrib/ipfilter/
netinet/ip_fil.c:109:
/usr/src/sys/modules/ipfilter/../../contrib/ipfilter/netinet/ip_
On 2004-12-22 04:07, Zachary Huang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> in the usr/src/UPDATING file with FreeBSD 4.2:
>
> we have:
>
>To update from 4.0-RELEASE or later to the most current
> 4.x-STABLE
> --
> make buildworld
>
in the usr/src/UPDATING file with FreeBSD 4.2:
we have:
To update from 4.0-RELEASE or later to the most current
4.x-STABLE
--
make buildworld
make buildkernel KERNEL=YOUR_KERNEL_HERE
make installkernel KERNEL=YOUR_KERNEL_HERE
reboot
Mike wrote:
Greetings:
This is my first foray into 5.2.1. I installed and ran cvsup (standard
and for ports). I went to build the kernel and and "make buildkernel"
died. Here is the error message. Any comments or hints would be helpful.
# make buildkernel KERNEL=TRITON
/usr/src/s
To update your system, you should use the following procedure:
# make buildworld
# make buildkernel KERNCONF=TRITON
# make installkernel KERNCONF=TRITON
# reboot
You should boot in single user mode (using boot -s from loader prompt for
example). Then run:
# mergemaster -p
# make installworld
From: Mike
>
> This is my first foray into 5.2.1. I installed and ran cvsup
(standard
> and for ports). I went to build the kernel and and "make buildkernel"
> died. Here is the error message. Any comments or hints would be
helpful.
>
> # make buildkernel KERNEL=TR
At 5:15 PM -0700 8/10/04, Mike wrote:
Greetings:
This is my first foray into 5.2.1. I installed and ran cvsup
(standard and for ports). I went to build the kernel and and
"make buildkernel" died. Here is the error message. Any
comments or hints would be helpful.
Did you just install
Greetings:
This is my first foray into 5.2.1. I installed and ran cvsup (standard
and for ports). I went to build the kernel and and "make buildkernel"
died. Here is the error message. Any comments or hints would be helpful.
# make buildkernel KERNEL=TRITON
/usr/src/sys/m
> Im updating a backup server running FBSD 4.9, of ours by doing the whole
> make buildworld make buildkernel procedure..This machine was originally a
> 4.8 server that i did a succesful make buildworld upon the last release..
>
> anywho i updated src with cvsup and then did the f
Im updating a backup server running FBSD 4.9, of ours by doing the whole
make buildworld make buildkernel procedure..This machine was originally a
4.8 server that i did a succesful make buildworld upon the last release..
anywho i updated src with cvsup and then did the following
cp -Rp /etc
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 05:53:19PM -0700, Richard Marriner wrote:
> Dear List,
>
>I have googled this but no luck there. I am getting a stop error while
> building the kernel. We are upgrading from FreeBSD-10Beta to 10-stable.
> The system was built on another machine and nfs mounting into t
Dear List,
I have googled this but no luck there. I am getting a stop error while
building the kernel. We are upgrading from FreeBSD-10Beta to 10-stable.
The system was built on another machine and nfs mounting into the current
machine (both /usr/src and /usr/obj). At first I thought it migh
C_DEBUG #debug for IP security
>
> su-2.05b# make buildkernel KERNCONF=ESHARA
> ...
> ...
> /usr/src/sys/crypto/blowfish/bf_ecb.c:79: undefined reference to
> `BF_encrypt'
I'd like to hear back how performance is, to know if assembly code is
worthwhile.
---
On Feb 24, 2004, at 7:16 PM, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
*default host=cvsup12.freebsd.org
*default prefix=/usr
*default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5_2_1_RELEASE
*default delete use-rel-suffix
*default compress
src-all
for shits and giggles I ran cvsup against cvsup.freebsd.org:
su-2.05b# cvsup -Z -g -L 2 /u
On Feb 24, 2004, at 7:12 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 07:08:58PM -0500, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
Anyone have any ideas?
Post your cvsupfile..you may have an incomplete source tree.
*default host=cvsup12.freebsd.org
*default prefix=/usr
*default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5_2_1_RELEASE
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 07:08:58PM -0500, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
> Anyone have any ideas?
Post your cvsupfile..you may have an incomplete source tree.
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Anyone have any ideas?
optionsIPSEC #IP security
optionsIPSEC_ESP #IP security (crypto; define w/
IPSEC)
optionsIPSEC_DEBUG #debug for IP security
su-2.05b# make buildkernel KERNCONF=ESHARA
...
...
sh /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh ESHARA
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 10:30:52PM +0200, Zh Zhechev wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a problem with DTK computer(i386). When i try to build a custom kernel an
> error happen:
>
> aic7xxx.c:2525:1682: warning: null character(s) ignored
You seem to have a corrupted source tree. This is most likely c
Hi all,
I have a problem with DTK computer(i386). When i try to build a custom kernel an error
happen:
aic7xxx.c:2525:1682: warning: null character(s) ignored
/usr/src/sys/dev/aic7xxx/aic7xxx.c:2525:1817: warning: null character(s) ignored
/usr/src/sys/dev/aic7xxx/aic7xxx.c:2525:1924: warning: n
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 10:17:25AM +0200, Je Zhechev wrote:
> Hi, that is my kernel and it's fail when:
> cd /usr/src
> make buildkernel KERNCONF=PETCOM
These are almost always caused by omitting something mandatory from
your kernel config, or failing to follow the upgrade direct
On Thursday 18 December 2003 12:17 am, Je Zhechev wrote:
> Hi, that is my kernel and it's fail when:
> cd /usr/src
> make buildkernel KERNCONF=PETCOM
>
> #To statically compile in device wiring instead of /boot/device.hints
> #hints"GENERIC.hints"
Hi, that is my kernel and it's fail when:
cd /usr/src
make buildkernel KERNCONF=PETCOM
The kernel:
#
# Petcom
#
# For more information on this file, please read the handbook section on
# Kernel Configuration Files:
#
#http://www.FreeBSD.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelc
D J Hawkey Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Something's been bugging me about 'make buildkernel ...' (or pro'lly more
> precisely, the docs): How do I re-make the kernel without first cleaning
> /usr/obj/...?
[snip]
> Anyway, is it as simple as:
>
ded message -
Looking further into the make files, it would appear as though all I
would really have to do is 'rm /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/.../vers.*', and do
the 'make buildkernel KERNCONF=...' just as usual.
This sounds vaguely familiar... From the "old" way... So
-DNOCLEAN do not clean at all
> >
> > Anyway, is it as simple as:
> > make buildkernel -DNOCLEAN KERNCONF=...
>
> So long as you aren't changing the kernel configuration, then you can
> probably use the 'old' build mechanism:
[SNIP]
> However
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 09:32:26AM -0500, D J Hawkey Jr wrote:
> Hi All.
>
> Something's been bugging me about 'make buildkernel ...' (or pro'lly more
> precisely, the docs): How do I re-make the kernel without first cleaning
> /usr/obj/...?
>
> After
Hi All.
Something's been bugging me about 'make buildkernel ...' (or pro'lly more
precisely, the docs): How do I re-make the kernel without first cleaning
/usr/obj/...?
After applying patches, I bump $BRANCH in /sys/conf/newvers.sh, and would
like the running kernel to
"Dante Pastrana" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Why does config fail when I add
>
> "devicelpt0at isa? port? tty irq 7 vector lpintr"
>
> which I took from the FreeBSD handbook anyway?
That line doesn't appear in the current handbook. You don't mention
what version of FreeBSD you're ru
Why does config fail when I add
"devicelpt0at isa? port? tty irq 7 vector lpintr"
which I took from the FreeBSD handbook anyway?
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send
a make clean, I cvsup the latest
> > sources and then go 'make buildworld' and 'make installworld'. This doesn't
> > give any problems, but then the 'make buildkernel' fails miserably:
>
> Make sure you have exactly one of the next two lines in
d' and 'make installworld'. This doesn't
> give any problems, but then the 'make buildkernel' fails miserably:
Make sure you have exactly one of the next two lines in your
kernel configuration file. (I'd recommend the first.)
options SCHED_4BSD
options SCH
Hi,
I've been trying to upgrade my desktop pc, which ran 5.0-R without any
problems for months, to 5.1-R. After a make clean, I cvsup the latest
sources and then go 'make buildworld' and 'make installworld'. This doesn't
give any problems, but then the 'make bui
On 31-Mar-2003 Erik Trulsson wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 04:21:57PM -0800, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>> Hi again. Is there a way to get 'make buildkernel' in /usr/src to not
>> rebuild things that it already compiled? I'm playing around on a
>> not-very-fast l
On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 04:21:57PM -0800, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> Hi again. Is there a way to get 'make buildkernel' in /usr/src to not
> rebuild things that it already compiled? I'm playing around on a
> not-very-fast laptop, and the rebuilds take forever.
'make -DN
Hi again. Is there a way to get 'make buildkernel' in /usr/src to not
rebuild things that it already compiled? I'm playing around on a
not-very-fast laptop, and the rebuilds take forever.
--Paul Hoffman
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ma
tml
> to the letter to do this. My make buildworld went just fine,
> although I can't seem to get past this make buildkernel compile
> problem. I CVSup'd on February 1st 2003 at around 6:00pm. It keeps
> failing on umass.c, the below is the offending output of the build:
cv
27;m attempting to upgrade all the source on. I'm
>following the directions found at:
>http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html to the
>letter to do this. My make buildworld went just fine, although I can't seem to get
>past this make buildk
n't seem to get
past this make buildkernel compile problem. I CVSup'd on February 1st 2003 at around
6:00pm. It keeps failing on umass.c, the below is the offending output of the build:
===> umass
cc -O -pipe -D_KERNEL -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-proto
wrote:
> >> (11.14.2002 @ 0019 PST): E.S. said, in 4.8K: <<
> >
> > I've considered it, but isn't -STABLE a bit less stable than -RELEASE,
> > since the source in it is newer?
> >
> >> end of "Re: make buildkernel says device atapicam
>
> >> (11.14.2002 @ 0019 PST): E.S. said, in 4.8K: <<
> > I've considered it, but isn't -STABLE a bit less stable than -RELEASE,
> > since the source in it is newer?
>
> - -RELEASE is just a snapshot of -STABLE at a specific point in time. In
> general, -STABLE is supposed to remain stable enou
E.S. wrote:
I've considered it, but isn't -STABLE a bit less stable than -RELEASE, since
the source in it is newer?
There are two views. Stable has new code but it also has bug fixes
that never make it to one of the _x varieties. I go for the bug fixes.
I just don't want to get stuck runnin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>> (11.14.2002 @ 0019 PST): E.S. said, in 4.8K: <<
> I've considered it, but isn't -STABLE a bit less stable than -RELEASE, since
> the source in it is newer?
>> end of "Re: make buildkernel says d
e? It would have everything and the atapicam.
>
> Kent
>
> > -ES
> >
> > On Thursday 14 November 2002 01:15 am, Kent Stewart wrote:
> >>E.S. wrote:
> >>>I figured out my make buildworld problem I mentioned earlier (I'd
> >>>uncomme
world builds OK, I'm having kernel build problems.
I'm building 4.7-RELEASE (cvsup'ing to RELENG_4_7), and here's all the
output for "make buildkernel KERNCONF=KERNELCONF4":
--
Ker
w that
> > world builds OK, I'm having kernel build problems.
> >
> > I'm building 4.7-RELEASE (cvsup'ing to RELENG_4_7), and here's all the
> > output for "make buildkernel KERNCONF=KERNELCONF4":
> >
> > --
e doing part of this. The web page says
the atapicam device has been in 4.7-stable source since 1-nov-2002. It
sounds like you have basically applied the patch twice. All I did was
add "device atapicam" after my atapicd like so
device atapicd # ATAPI CDROM driv
I figured out my make buildworld problem I mentioned earlier (I'd uncommented
NO_OPENSSL=true in my make.conf - big mistake!), and now that world builds
OK, I'm having kernel build problems.
I'm building 4.7-RELEASE (cvsup'ing to RELENG_4_7), and here's all the outp
On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 07:11:41AM +0700, - wrote:
> ===> VLAN
> mkdir -p /usr/obj/usr/src/sys
> cd /usr/src/sys/i386/conf;
>
>PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/sbin:/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/bin:/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/games:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin
> config -d /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/VLAN /
hi guys..
i want to plan to upgrade my FreeBSD
from 4.6-STABLE to 5-Current.
i use tag=. ( at stable-supfile )
but,.. while i make buildkernel my kernel after i buildworld, i got and
error message below :
--
>>> Kernel
100 matches
Mail list logo
