y have working BSD-licensed versions of diff and diff3 in the
> SoC repo.
>
That's the repository here? (not coming up for me at the moment)
https://socsvn.freebsd.org/socsvn/soc2012/jhagewood/
Those files are using the 3-clause BSD license?
Thanks,
CY
___
Clifford Yapp writes:
> The issue is of some interest because the wiki page documenting
> candidates to replace GPL software in base list the OpenBSD copies of
> the diff tools: [...]
We already have working BSD-licensed versions of diff and diff3 in the
SoC repo.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d
Looking at the original code for diff:
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/csrg/usr.bin/diff/
The licensing that applies to it seems to be simply that of the standard
BSD license:
http://www.freebsd.org/copyright/license.html
Is that correct? If so, what's the relationship between that code an
On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 16:01:03 -0500, ajtiM wrote:
> Again me
>
> Last time I try to make some T-shirts which I have on my redbubble page. It
> is
> not a big nmoney, I didn't sell anything just one card :) but I like to make
> a
> T-shirt design with Beastie on it too. Do I need a permissio
Hi,
On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 16:01:03 -0500
ajtiM wrote:
> Again me
>
> Last time I try to make some T-shirts which I have on my redbubble
> page. It is not a big nmoney, I didn't sell anything just one card :)
> but I like to make a T-shirt design with Beastie on it too. Do I need
> a permissio
Again me
Last time I try to make some T-shirts which I have on my redbubble page. It is
not a big nmoney, I didn't sell anything just one card :) but I like to make a
T-shirt design with Beastie on it too. Do I need a permission for using
Beastie or it is free or I cannot use.
Thank you.
You might have to re-write it from scratch. It's still copyrighted by
the university. I'd say write it in c++ to dispel all doubt that you
didn't copy. Then true and groff will be c++.
There's still software in the tree that uses the four clause license.
But becaus
On 01/31/12 12:55, vermaden wrote:
FreeBSD, as specified here [1] uses 2-clause BSD license,
but /usr/bin/true [2] (as empty as it is) uses something like
3-clause BSD license, is that desired?
[1] http://www.freebsd.org/copyright/freebsd-license.html
[2] http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi
FreeBSD, as specified here [1] uses 2-clause BSD license,
but /usr/bin/true [2] (as empty as it is) uses something like
3-clause BSD license, is that desired?
[1] http://www.freebsd.org/copyright/freebsd-license.html
[2] http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/~checkout~/src/usr.bin/true/true.c
> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Mon May 9 18:04:36 2011
> Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 18:04:30 -0500
> From: Dan Nelson
> To: Sean Hamilton
> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: License for console fonts
>
> In the last episode (May 09), Sean Hamilt
In the last episode (May 09), Sean Hamilton said:
> What is the license on the fonts in /usr/share/syscons/fonts, especially
> swiss-8x8? Who/what is their origin? Would it be acceptable to include
> these binaries with a GPL-licensed program?
I submitted the "swiss" fonts
Hello,
What is the license on the fonts in /usr/share/syscons/fonts,
especially swiss-8x8? Who/what is their origin? Would it be acceptable
to include these binaries with a GPL-licensed program?
Thanks in advance,
--
Sean Hamilton
___
freebsd
2011/3/3 Kouichiro Iwao :
> I'm writing a script based on the code in freebsd docs, and caring
> about the license of it. The original scripts are example 6 and 7 of
> the following page. How do I have to treat my code if I distribute it?
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/e
Thank you for your information. I will treat them under FreeBSD license.
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 07:46:40PM +, Frank Shute wrote:
> Since those scripts have been contributed to the FreeBSD project, I
> would treat them as if they had the standard FreeBSD license.
>
> If you d
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 11:53:14PM +0900, Kouichiro Iwao wrote:
>
> I'm writing a script based on the code in freebsd docs,
> and caring about the license of it. The original scripts are
> example 6 and 7 of the following page. How do I have to treat
> my code if I d
I'm writing a script based on the code in freebsd docs,
and caring about the license of it. The original scripts are
example 6 and 7 of the following page. How do I have to treat
my code if I distribute it?
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/ldap-auth/client.html
I know freebsd do
On 8 November 2010 22:35, Roland Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 09:44:29PM +0100, C. P. Ghost wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Roland Smith wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 05:08:33PM +0100, Svein Skogen (Listmail
> account) wrote:
> > >> But it's still not capable of true
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 09:44:29PM +0100, C. P. Ghost wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Roland Smith wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 05:08:33PM +0100, Svein Skogen (Listmail account)
> > wrote:
> >> But it's still not capable of true forward-error-correction. If we are
> >> to embark up
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Svein Skogen (Listmail account)
wrote:
> And I'm ... all too familiar with redundancy strategies (and backups).
> Including their shortcomings. Speaking of which: Has there been any
> progress on properly backing up ZFS on FreeBSD yet? (including the metadata)
I u
On 08.11.2010 21:44, C. P. Ghost wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Roland Smith wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 05:08:33PM +0100, Svein Skogen (Listmail account)
>> wrote:
>>> But it's still not capable of true forward-error-correction. If we are
>>> to embark upon creating a new solutio
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Roland Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 05:08:33PM +0100, Svein Skogen (Listmail account)
> wrote:
>> But it's still not capable of true forward-error-correction. If we are
>> to embark upon creating a new solution, using something that is cheap
>> for "norma
On 08.11.2010 18:47, Arthur Chance wrote:
*snip*
>
> Presuming you're talking about ZFS, the hash isn't intended to correct
> hardware errors, it's only there to detect them. Correction comes from
> mirroring or the use of RAIDZ{1,2,3}. (I have personal experience of how
> well that works, as I ha
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 05:08:33PM +0100, Svein Skogen (Listmail account) wrote:
> >>> The GEOM_ELI class provides optional authentication/checksumming. See
> >>> geli(8),
> >>> especially the -a option.
> >> im not sure on whether that you be a viable replacement, as it has to be
> >> a fairly go
On 11/08/10 16:08, Svein Skogen (Listmail account) wrote:
On 08.11.2010 16:37, Arthur Chance wrote:
On 11/08/10 13:52, krad wrote:
On 6 November 2010 21:38, Roland Smith wrote:
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 02:30:16PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
Having said all that it really depends on whether yo
On 08.11.2010 16:37, Arthur Chance wrote:
> On 11/08/10 13:52, krad wrote:
>> On 6 November 2010 21:38, Roland Smith wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 02:30:16PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
> Having said all that it really depends on whether you need the extra
> features of zfs. Personal
On 11/08/10 13:52, krad wrote:
On 6 November 2010 21:38, Roland Smith wrote:
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 02:30:16PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
Having said all that it really depends on whether you need the extra
features of zfs. Personally I cant see how anyone with any important
data
can do wit
On 6 November 2010 21:38, Roland Smith wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 02:30:16PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
> > > Having said all that it really depends on whether you need the extra
> > > features of zfs. Personally I cant see how anyone with any important
> data
> > > can do without checksumin
> "Chip" == Chip Camden writes:
Chip> I hope it's more than wishful thinking on their part. I would trust
Chip> Oracle to keep "hands off" for precisely as long as they do not perceive
Chip> any reason to put "hands on".
Understood... clearly, the suits can do whatever they want whenever th
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010 17:45:07 -0500
Chris Brennan articulated:
> LibreOffice (Libre is Latin for free) is a functional
> name as is (personally I don't like the name, but I hated
> StarOffice's name too!) and has potential. But DF faces an uphill
> battle in re-educating the world that LibreOffice
> > their predecessors) had released and that people were using as-is.
> > That's legitimate use under license from the software's originators.
>
> How long are you planning to use it as-is, without making any changes, if
> Oracle ceases support for an open source version?
t to ensure the
> > survival of your own development projects? It seems somewhat likely,
> > somehow.
>
> Oracle couldn't sue for patent violations on software that they (or
> their predecessors) had released and that people were using as-is.
> That's legitimate use
> survival of your own development projects? It seems somewhat likely,
>> somehow.
>
>Oracle couldn't sue for patent violations on software that they (or
>their predecessors) had released and that people were using as-is.
>That's legitimate use under license from the sof
Quoth Randal L. Schwartz on Saturday, 06 November 2010:
> > "Chip" == Chip Camden writes:
>
> Chip> The one in that list that worries me the most is VirtualBox -- that's a
> Chip> truly useful solution that isn't easily replaced. But I read somewhere
> Chip> that there was a movement gaining
ly,
> somehow.
Oracle couldn't sue for patent violations on software that they (or
their predecessors) had released and that people were using as-is.
That's legitimate use under license from the software's originators.
Nor could they sue successfully over some completely novel
im
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 07:09:57PM -0400, Chris Brennan wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Chip Camden
> wrote:
> >
> > The one in that list that worries me the most is VirtualBox -- that's a
> > truly useful solution that isn't easily replaced. But I read somewhere
> > that there was a mov
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 05:00:53PM -0700, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> App Deb wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 6:44 AM, Steven Susbauer wrote:
> > > Sun was able to successfully sue Microsoft for similar reasons
> > > in 1997 (incomplete implementation of the Java standard).
> > If I remember
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 8:00 PM, wrote:
> App Deb wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 6:44 AM, Steven Susbauer
> wrote:
> > > Sun was able to successfully sue Microsoft for similar reasons
> > > in 1997 (incomplete implementation of the Java standard).
> > If I remember correctly, the Microsoft Ja
> "Chad" == Chad Perrin writes:
Chad> I have not really spent any quality time with ZFS, so I'm a little
Chad> sketchy on the details. Is there anything the checksumming capabilities
Chad> of ZFS do that cannot be duplicated with an external tool -- perhaps
Chad> something like a filesystem
> "Chip" == Chip Camden writes:
Chip> The one in that list that worries me the most is VirtualBox -- that's a
Chip> truly useful solution that isn't easily replaced. But I read somewhere
Chip> that there was a movement gaining steam to break off from Oracle.
When I interviewed the VirtualBo
App Deb wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 6:44 AM, Steven Susbauer wrote:
> > Sun was able to successfully sue Microsoft for similar reasons
> > in 1997 (incomplete implementation of the Java standard).
> If I remember correctly, the Microsoft Java VM was abandoned
> because of this and everyone ha
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Chip Camden wrote:
>
> The one in that list that worries me the most is VirtualBox -- that's a
> truly useful solution that isn't easily replaced. But I read somewhere
> that there was a movement gaining steam to break off from Oracle.
>
>
I agree, vBox is vital ..
Quoth Chad Perrin on Saturday, 06 November 2010:
> On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 06:56:11PM +, krad wrote:
> >
> > this thread shouldnt be limited to just zfs really, dtrace is also affected
> > by all the same licensing issues
>
> While we're at it, OpenOffice.org, MySQL, Solaris, Java, and Virtua
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 01:20:39PM -0400, Chris Brennan wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Svein Skogen (Listmail account) <
> > svein-listm...@stillbilde.net> wrote:
> >
> > > > Chad, what are these attachments to your e-mail? My cli
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 02:30:16PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
> > Having said all that it really depends on whether you need the extra
> > features of zfs. Personally I cant see how anyone with any important data
> > can do without checksuming.
>
> I guess that depends on what you're doing with the
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 01:20:39PM -0400, Chris Brennan wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Svein Skogen (Listmail account) <
> svein-listm...@stillbilde.net> wrote:
>
> > > Chad, what are these attachments to your e-mail? My client keeps
> > flagging
> > > your mail as questionable and I'm
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 06:56:11PM +, krad wrote:
>
> this thread shouldnt be limited to just zfs really, dtrace is also affected
> by all the same licensing issues
While we're at it, OpenOffice.org, MySQL, Solaris, Java, and VirtualBox are
also entangled with Oracle. There may be others tha
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 06:52:19PM +, krad wrote:
>
> the main problem is geom and ufs isnt a like for like replacement yet. Good
> as though geom is it just not as easy as zfs from an adminsistration point
> of view in my opinion. It may potentinally get a block checksum class but it
> will b
On 06.11.2010 19:52, krad wrote:
> On 5 November 2010 19:11, Alejandro Imass wrote:
>
>> Hey folks,
>>
>> A while back I started the thread "Troubles on SATA drives ZFS". I
>> decided to bring the zpool down check each disk and re-construct the
>> pool. Nevertheless, I was revising one of the ZFS
On 5 November 2010 22:19, Alejandro Imass wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 08:25:05PM +0100, Svein Skogen (Listmail account)
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Well ... CDDL was (iirc) based on the Mozilla Public License.
On 5 November 2010 19:11, Alejandro Imass wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> A while back I started the thread "Troubles on SATA drives ZFS". I
> decided to bring the zpool down check each disk and re-construct the
> pool. Nevertheless, I was revising one of the ZFS error message links
> and Oracle made me
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Svein Skogen (Listmail account) <
svein-listm...@stillbilde.net> wrote:
> > Chad, what are these attachments to your e-mail? My client keeps
> flagging
> > your mail as questionable and I'm sandboxing it to make sure it's nothing
> > bad :D
>
> I suppose they are
On 06.11.2010 17:44, Chris Brennan wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 11:25:13PM -0500, Steven Susbauer wrote:
>>> On 11/5/10 4:34 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
Will Oracle start using patent suits to try to stop people
who aren't paying
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 11:25:13PM -0500, Steven Susbauer wrote:
> > On 11/5/10 4:34 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> > >Will Oracle start using patent suits to try to stop people
> > >who aren't paying for ZFS or who are using it on platforms other
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 11:25:13PM -0500, Steven Susbauer wrote:
> On 11/5/10 4:34 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> >Will Oracle start using patent suits to try to stop people
> >who aren't paying for ZFS or who are using it on platforms other than
> >Solaris from using it?
> >
> >Whether you think concern
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 09:16:05AM +0200, App Deb wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 6:44 AM, Steven Susbauer wrote:
>
> > Android uses the Java language, but this is not what that suit is about.
> > Oracle claims the Dalvik VM infringes on their patents. If Android was using
> > the Java VM there w
Once
> >open source gets good enough, competing with it would be insane. [...]
> >We don't have to fight open source, we have to exploit open source.
> >
> >Source: Financial Times interview, 18-Apr-2006
> >http://us.ft.com/ftgateway/superpage.ft?news_id=fto041820
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 12:44 AM, Steven Susbauer wrote:
> On 11/5/10 5:19 PM, Alejandro Imass wrote:
>>
[...]
> It sounds like he's probably a big fan of the BSD license. I do not see how
> this is a bad thing, other than he uses potentially inflammatory words like
> "
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 6:44 AM, Steven Susbauer wrote:
> Android uses the Java language, but this is not what that suit is about.
> Oracle claims the Dalvik VM infringes on their patents. If Android was using
> the Java VM there would be no lawsuit. Sun was able to successfully sue
> Microsoft fo
On 11/5/10 4:34 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
Will Oracle start using patent suits to try to stop people
who aren't paying for ZFS or who are using it on platforms other than
Solaris from using it?
Whether you think concerns like these will prove reasonable in the long
run, they make a lot more sense t
loit open source.
Source: Financial Times interview, 18-Apr-2006
http://us.ft.com/ftgateway/superpage.ft?news_id=fto041820061306424713
It sounds like he's probably a big fan of the BSD license. I do not see
how this is a bad thing, other than he uses potentially inflammatory
words like "explo
there is under the CDDL. Should
Oracle change the license for subsequent releases of ZFS in a way
unacceptable to us, FreeBSD's ZFS will either stagnate and rot, or
it will get developed independently in FreeBSD (and perhaps in IllumOS?)
along a different path, a.k.a. a fork.
This leaves us the
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 08:25:05PM +0100, Svein Skogen (Listmail account)
> wrote:
>>
>> Well ... CDDL was (iirc) based on the Mozilla Public License. Are you
>> similarly worried about Thunderbird or Firefox?
>
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 08:25:05PM +0100, Svein Skogen (Listmail account) wrote:
>
> Well ... CDDL was (iirc) based on the Mozilla Public License. Are you
> similarly worried about Thunderbird or Firefox?
I think Alejandro's more worried about what will happen with future
version
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 03:11:47PM -0400, Alejandro Imass wrote:
>
> A while back I started the thread "Troubles on SATA drives ZFS". I
> decided to bring the zpool down check each disk and re-construct the
> pool. Nevertheless, I was revising one of the ZFS error message links
> and Oracle made m
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 8:14 PM, Alejandro Imass wrote:
> Maybe I should go back to UFS, CCD, GEOM, etc. instead of continuing
> to support f***ing Oracle. ZFS was honestly very easy and seemed very
> reliable and fast, but I would like the opinion and position of people
> here on ZFS before I cont
and seemed very
> reliable and fast, but I would like the opinion and position of people
> here on ZFS before I continue using it.
Well ... CDDL was (iirc) based on the Mozilla Public License. Are you
similarly worried about Thunderbird or Firefox?
//Svein
--
+-
Hey folks,
A while back I started the thread "Troubles on SATA drives ZFS". I
decided to bring the zpool down check each disk and re-construct the
pool. Nevertheless, I was revising one of the ZFS error message links
and Oracle made me create a developer id to access the info. This
really pissed m
Hey folks,
A while back I started the thread "Troubles on SATA drives ZFS". I
decided to bring the zpool down check each disk and re-construct the
pool. Nevertheless, I was revising one of the ZFS error message links
and Oracle made me create a developer id to access the info. This
really pissed m
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:43 PM, tristan wrote:
> the 8.0-RELEASE-i386-dvd1.iso.gz is under some compilation copyright. what
> does this mean, and can i freely edit the iso, rename it, and sell it?
> can i get a copy of the license for the 8.0-RELEASE-i386-dvd1.iso.gz? i want
>
t what did you not understand about the previous answer you just got?
Most of FreeBSD is under a BSD license, which means "do nearly anything you
want with it". Some *parts* of a standard FreeBSD distro are under more
restrictive licenses, and you need to either comply with those lic
the 8.0-RELEASE-i386-dvd1.iso.gz is under some compilation copyright. what
does this mean, and can i freely edit the iso, rename it, and sell it? can i
get a copy of the license for the 8.0-RELEASE-i386-dvd1.iso.gz? i want to do
what Apple did with FreeBSD - edit, rename, and sell, can i do
On Feb 15, 2010, at 10:38 AM, tristan wrote:
> is the FreeBSD-8.0-amd.iso itself under the bsd license?
Mostly; there's a compilation copyright associated with the FreeBSD ISO images,
but some of the components of FreeBSD are under the GPL (notably the GCC
compiler toolchain), and possi
is the FreeBSD-8.0-amd.iso itself under the bsd license?
i mean the free bsd operating system, not the software
i plan to modify then redistribute it, under a new name. it will remain under
the same license, with the same copyright docs, but the help or other docs will
be gone, my own put in
(redirecting to freebsd-emulation@, please trim freebsd-questions@)
Rich Winkel writes:
> I'm trying to run mathlm for mathematica version 7 under linux_base-fc-4_13 on
> freebsd 7.1-release-p7.
>
> It demonizes and appears to be happy until I try to run mathematica,
> then it crashes with signa
I'm trying to run mathlm for mathematica version 7 under linux_base-fc-4_13 on
freebsd 7.1-release-p7.
It demonizes and appears to be happy until I try to run mathematica,
then it crashes with signal 11. Even running monitorlm causes it
to crash. Maxing out the loglevel doesn't produce any more
Bob Johnson wrote:
On 7/21/08, Chad Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That wouldn't solve the problem of the US dollar being a fiat currency.
Basically, under a fiat currency, trying to financially plan for the
future is a matter of gambling the economy won't blow up in your face in
the interim
On 7/21/08, Chad Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That wouldn't solve the problem of the US dollar being a fiat currency.
> Basically, under a fiat currency, trying to financially plan for the
> future is a matter of gambling the economy won't blow up in your face in
> the interim -- which is a
L PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> What price at the license of FreeBSD 7?
>>
>> it's important for me. I must know.
>>
>
> It is available for the low low price of $0 or the equivalent in your local
> currency. Yes really :)
>
> Kris
>
> _
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 11:02:01AM -0400, Jerry McAllister wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 08:40:20AM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 02:55:22PM +0700, OutBackDingo wrote:
> > >
> > > > How many Zimbabwe dollars, I wonder? This seems to give the finest
> > > > measureme
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 08:40:20AM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 02:55:22PM +0700, OutBackDingo wrote:
> >
> > > How many Zimbabwe dollars, I wonder? This seems to give the finest
> > > measurement for approximations to zero...
> >
> > I think this is a bit uncalled for,
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 7:37 PM, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
>> Your comments are useless and stigmatizes people who suffers (Zimbabwe).
>
> Stigmatizes people in Zimbabwe? Huh? If anything it draws sympathy for them
Two or so years ago, I used to tell a fellow
On Jul 20, 2008, at 1:24 AM, Gaye Abdoulaye Walsimou wrote:
Mike Jeays a écrit :
On July 19, 2008 04:21:03 pm Gonzalo Nemmi wrote:
On Saturday 19 July 2008 15:40:53 Kris Kennaway wrote:
... or the equivalent in your
local currency. Yes really :)
Kris
ROFL to death !
Sorry .. couldn't h
On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 08:40:20 -0600
Chad Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The US Dollar hasn't really been worth anything since 1975 at the
> latest. People just haven't figured that out yet.
In that case, would you be so kind as to forward all of those worthless
US Dollars to me. I will be mor
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 09:49:30AM -0400, Jerry McAllister wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 10:18:13PM +0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > What price at the license of FreeBSD 7?
> >
> > it's important for me. I must know.
>
> Regardless of how far Off To
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 02:55:22PM +0700, OutBackDingo wrote:
>
> > How many Zimbabwe dollars, I wonder? This seems to give the finest
> > measurement for approximations to zero...
>
> I think this is a bit uncalled for, it might have been in a candid
> manner, but there are alot of locations i
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 10:18:13PM +0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What price at the license of FreeBSD 7?
>
> it's important for me. I must know.
Regardless of how far Off Topic some seem to want to go,
the reply by Kris is correct. FreeBSD is free. The only
cost is medi
Let's see, ... that would be approximately $149*10^12 Zimbabwe.
10^3 - one thousand
10^6 - one million
10^9 - one billion
10^12 - one trillion
10^100 - one mugabe
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
ROFL, right, whatever..!!!
On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 04:40 -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> full of fallacies, false assumptions and one or two non
> sequiturs.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-qu
OutBackDingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > How many Zimbabwe dollars, I wonder? This seems to give the finest
> > measurement for approximations to zero...
>
> I think this is a bit uncalled for, it might have been in a candid
> manner, but there are alot of locations in the world using FreeBS
> How many Zimbabwe dollars, I wonder? This seems to give the finest
> measurement for approximations to zero...
I think this is a bit uncalled for, it might have been in a candid
manner, but there are alot of locations in the world using FreeBSD
quite effectively where most people live on less
Mike Jeays a écrit :
On July 19, 2008 04:21:03 pm Gonzalo Nemmi wrote:
On Saturday 19 July 2008 15:40:53 Kris Kennaway wrote:
... or the equivalent in your
local currency. Yes really :)
Kris
ROFL to death !
Sorry .. couldn't help it ...
You made me spit my pepsi all over my de
On July 19, 2008 04:21:03 pm Gonzalo Nemmi wrote:
> On Saturday 19 July 2008 15:40:53 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > ... or the equivalent in your
> > local currency. Yes really :)
> >
> > Kris
>
> ROFL to death !
> Sorry .. couldn't help it ...
> You made me spit my pepsi all over my desktop !
> Thanks
On Sat, 19 Jul 2008, Kris Kennaway wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What price at the license of FreeBSD 7?
it's important for me. I must know.
It is available for the low low price of $0 or the equivalent in your local
currency. Yes really :)
Let's see, ... that would be app
On Saturday 19 July 2008 15:40:53 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> ... or the equivalent in your
> local currency. Yes really :)
>
> Kris
ROFL to death !
Sorry .. couldn't help it ...
You made me spit my pepsi all over my desktop !
Thanks!!
--
Blessings
Gonzalo Nemmi
__
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What price at the license of FreeBSD 7?
it's important for me. I must know.
It is available for the low low price of $0 or the equivalent in your
local currency. Yes really :)
Kris
___
freebsd-questions@freebs
What price at the license of FreeBSD 7?
it's important for me. I must know.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
SD: i would be
>>> like install freebsd in corporation on workstation (don't
>>> servers). Its free ? Or FreeBSD free for individual using ?
>> Yes
>
> Funny but this answer may not be helpful :) "Yes" meaning "free for
> corporate environment&
On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 11:09:07PM +0300, Free BSD wrote:
> Hello, i have a question about licensing FreeBSD: i would be like
> install freebsd in corporation on workstation (don't servers). Its
> free ? Or FreeBSD free for individual using ?
http://www.freebsd.org/copyright/freebsd-license.html d
Hello,
2008/1/21, Aryeh M. Friedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Free BSD wrote:
> > Hello, i have a question about licensing FreeBSD: i would be like
> > install freebsd in corporation on workstation (don't servers). Its
> > free ? Or FreeBSD free for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Free BSD wrote:
> Hello, i have a question about licensing FreeBSD: i would be like
> install freebsd in corporation on workstation (don't servers). Its
> free ? Or FreeBSD free for individual using ?
Yes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v
1 - 100 of 236 matches
Mail list logo
