i got it working with this configuration when i have the ftp client on
the linux box use passive ftp mode.
I haven't got into looking at pftpx yet, but its already working for
now, just have to make sure that i am using a client that works in
passive mode, not active.
On 8/15/06, Jeremy C. Reed
COOOL!
I will definately look into this when i get home..
nice, thanks!
On 8/15/06, Joao Barros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/14/06, Ivan Levchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Gilberto,
>
> No, that wouldn't work, there is no sense in adding a nat rule to the
> internal interface.
>
>
On 8/14/06, Ivan Levchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Gilberto,
No, that wouldn't work, there is no sense in adding a nat rule to the
internal interface.
I just found out why it didn't work. All this time, I was using active
ftp on my ubuntu box. when i switched to passive, it all worked
Hello Gilberto,
No, that wouldn't work, there is no sense in adding a nat rule to the
internal interface.
I just found out why it didn't work. All this time, I was using active
ftp on my ubuntu box. when i switched to passive, it all worked like a
charm. found it on some forum archive .. forgot
Hi everybody,
having some troubles with ftp-proxy on my gateway at home: the darn
thing gets me connected to an outside ftp server, but won't let me do
anything else with it.
the gateway computer is freebsd (it is running pf with nat to share
and secure a pppoe connection); the client computer i
