COOOL! I will definately look into this when i get home.. nice, thanks!
On 8/15/06, Joao Barros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/14/06, Ivan Levchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Gilberto, > > No, that wouldn't work, there is no sense in adding a nat rule to the > internal interface. > > I just found out why it didn't work. All this time, I was using active > ftp on my ubuntu box. when i switched to passive, it all worked like a > charm. found it on some forum archive .. forgot the link. on linux the > env setting for passive ftp doesn't work.. .i never knew that.. you > have you add -p to the ftp command or start it using pftp.. > > On 8/14/06, Gilberto Villani Brito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Try using this rule: > > nat on $int_if from any to any port 21 -> 127.0.0.1 port 8021 > > > > > > Gilberto > > > > > > 2006/8/13, Ivan Levchenko < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > Hi everybody, > > > > having some troubles with ftp-proxy on my gateway at home: the darn > > thing gets me connected to an outside ftp server, but won't let me do > > anything else with it. > > > > the gateway computer is freebsd (it is running pf with nat to share > > and secure a pppoe connection); the client computer is running kubuntu > > 6.06. > > > > any help (the right keyword to google with will be nice too!!!) will be > > great! I'm happilly using pftpx with no problems :-) http://www.freshports.org/ftp/pftpx/ -- Joao Barros
-- Best Regards, Ivan Levchenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
