Re: deleting an alias from interface cause the static route to be deleted

2012-02-23 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:55:58PM +0200, Коньков Евгений wrote: К> >> vlan74: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 К> >>        options=3 К> >>        ether f4:6d:04:7c:7b:d3 К> >>        inet6 fe80::f66d:4ff:fe7c:7bd3%vlan74 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xd К> >>        inet 10.1.26.1 netmask 0xfe00 broadca

Re[2]: deleting an alias from interface cause the static route to be deleted

2012-02-21 Thread Коньков Евгений
Здравствуйте, Ivan. Вы писали 21 февраля 2012 г., 0:45:33: II> 2012/2/20 Коньков Евгений : >> >> vlan74: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 >>        options=3 >>        ether f4:6d:04:7c:7b:d3 >>        inet6 fe80::f66d:4ff:fe7c:7bd3%vlan74 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xd >>        inet 10.1.26.1 netmask 0xf

Re[2]: deleting an alias from interface cause the static route to be deleted

2012-02-21 Thread Коньков Евгений
Здравствуйте, Matthew. Вы писали 21 февраля 2012 г., 14:10:37: MS> On 20/02/2012 20:06, Коньков Евгений wrote: >> >> vlan74: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 >> options=3 >> ether f4:6d:04:7c:7b:d3 >> inet6 fe80::f66d:4ff:fe7c:7bd3%vlan74 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xd >> i

Re: deleting an alias from interface cause the static route to be deleted

2012-02-21 Thread Adam Vande More
2012/2/20 Коньков Евгений > > vlan74: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu > 1500 >options=3 >ether f4:6d:04:7c:7b:d3 >inet6 fe80::f66d:4ff:fe7c:7bd3%vlan74 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xd >inet 10.1.26.1 netmask 0xfe00 broadcast 10.1.27.255 >inet 10.1.26.3 netmask 0xf

Re: deleting an alias from interface cause the static route to be deleted

2012-02-21 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 20/02/2012 20:06, Коньков Евгений wrote: > > vlan74: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 > options=3 > ether f4:6d:04:7c:7b:d3 > inet6 fe80::f66d:4ff:fe7c:7bd3%vlan74 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xd > inet 10.1.26.1 netmask 0xfe00 broadcast 10.1.27.255 > inet 10.1.

Re: deleting an alias from interface cause the static route to be deleted

2012-02-21 Thread Damien Fleuriot
On 2/21/12 9:34 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > On 21/02/2012 08:14, Damien Fleuriot wrote: >> I don't know if it's a bug or intended, but I do know you should use >> /32 aliases for additional IPs, not your original netmask. > > Actually, it's optional nowadays. Either way works. > Well idk,

Re: deleting an alias from interface cause the static route to be deleted

2012-02-21 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 21/02/2012 08:14, Damien Fleuriot wrote: > I don't know if it's a bug or intended, but I do know you should use > /32 aliases for additional IPs, not your original netmask. Actually, it's optional nowadays. Either way works. Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phi

Re: deleting an alias from interface cause the static route to be deleted

2012-02-21 Thread Damien Fleuriot
On 20 Feb 2012, at 21:06, Коньков Евгений wrote: > > vlan74: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 >options=3 >ether f4:6d:04:7c:7b:d3 >inet6 fe80::f66d:4ff:fe7c:7bd3%vlan74 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xd >inet 10.1.26.1 netmask 0xfe00 broadcast 10.1.27.255 >inet 1

deleting an alias from interface cause the static route to be deleted

2012-02-20 Thread Коньков Евгений
vlan74: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=3 ether f4:6d:04:7c:7b:d3 inet6 fe80::f66d:4ff:fe7c:7bd3%vlan74 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xd inet 10.1.26.1 netmask 0xfe00 broadcast 10.1.27.255 inet 10.1.26.3 netmask 0xfe00 broadcast 10.1.27.255 nd6